this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
918 points (98.8% liked)

World News

50069 readers
2154 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

If the ultra rich say your idea will ruin the economy - congratulations, you've got a great idea.

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 276 points 1 week ago (7 children)

He isn’t the economy. The workers are.

[–] 0li0li@lemmy.world 86 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yep. Bad for the economy, good for the people.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

Yacht sales will plummet by 5% though!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (4 children)

But he's a Job Creator or some shit

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 214 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bernard Arnault is worth 157.3 billion USD. $1 billion dollars is 0.6% of their wealth. That's fucking couch change. These fucking ghouls are so worried about their precious wealth they are willing to doom all of us.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 65 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Plus, he looks like the end of a Q-tip.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 88 points 1 week ago

Epstein's bud says it's a bad idea. France has technology to solve this problem.

[–] Babalugats@feddit.uk 82 points 1 week ago

"Making crime illegal would be detrimental for hospitals, electronics stores and insurance companies among others" says Europe's biggest criminal.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 76 points 1 week ago (2 children)

✅️ France running up huge deficits because it can't tax the wealthy

✅️ Wealthy obstruct any attempt to make them pay there fair share

✅️ prime minister after prime minister go down trying to fix the financial crisis

☑️ frustrated ~~king~~ president calls the estates general

...

☑️ this guys head in a basket

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 65 points 1 week ago (2 children)

His source is he made it up.

[–] Karjalan@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Actually it has some factual basis. He's wealthy, it would be bad for him, he thinks he's the economy. He just has a big, selfish, ego.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Binturong@lemmy.ca 64 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Firstly, that's just naked projection. Secondly... GOOD.

Sincerely, we need to treat people who can't or won't conceptualize 'enough' as hoarders with mental illness. He can never use his immense opulence or spend all of what he has, and he can't be happy with it either. He should be separated from it, given a stipend that will meet all his needs and desires from it while he GOES TO REHAB, and the rest should be reinjected into the economy for social gain, and used to pay for the public programs and systems that made society work to begin with. Mostly because if it never worked he would never have had this opportunity to destroy it for his own pride.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 61 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Every fucking time.

Goddamned, insatiably greedy motherfucker billionaires.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

Confirmed by this quote in the article. Certified motherfucker.

Arnault, who lives in Paris, sparked a French national debate over tax in 2012 when he sought Belgian citizenship. However, in April 2013, he withdrew his application as “a gesture of my attachment to France and my faith in its future”, according to Bloomberg.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They killed kings and queens with unbelievable wealth in France centuries ago and the country is still here. It proved that a nation can survive without a handful of people with massive wealth.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The point you're trying to make is true, but your example doesn't support it. By the time of the French Revolution, rich private citizens were already wealthier than the aristocracy, and those guys got even richer during the revolution after having bought former church or emigre land for pennies on the dollar. The French Revolution was a disaster on the wealth redistribution/"eat the rich" front.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The time for talking about taxing the rich is over. Bring out the guillotines already.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Who asked the grass about mowing?

[–] Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago

It's worse, it's like asking the parasite about it having to somewhat share what it has stolen from the host.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 1 week ago

"Rich guy says that forcing the rich to pay for their fair share of the costs of having a Society where they can make lots of money, would actually be bad for those currently having to make up for the rich not paying their fair share"

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 35 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Apart from this guy obviously being biased and a super villain: Nobody who held this opinion was ever able to even give me a rough idea of an explanation how it should supposedly damage the economy. The excessively rich don't spend most of their wealth (which would induce growth through demand), they sit on it and watch it grow. Taxing it takes not a single cent out of the economy.

In this case we're looking at proposed 2%. The fortunes of the excessively rich grow by 10% and more in a year. So with this tax they would still get richer and richer. Attach another zero to that number, then we'd be getting somewhere.

[–] geissi@feddit.org 19 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Nobody who held this opinion was ever able to even give me a rough idea of an explanation how it should supposedly damage the economy.

Because if you tax the rich, they move away! And that's clearly bad because...
They take their wealth with them! Just think of all the jewellery that will hang of people's necks in other countries and all the overpriced art that was never publicly displayed, now not visible elsewhere.
And of course they'll take all the housing and factories and the land they're built on, stuff it all in their pockets and fly away with it.

Just think of all the jobs. Not the jobs, companies are already offshoring now, of course.
And ignore that companies make such decisions based on productivity, available infrastructure and supply chain networks.
No, they'll move to less profitable countries because clearly not paying taxes is more important to rich people than making more money.

And of course, we can't tax people when they move away, so we shouldn't tax them to avoid this.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 32 points 1 week ago

I don't actually care about the economy. Improve my material conditions please

[–] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 week ago

Hey y'know what other famously French thing will be deadly for rich people if they're not taxed?

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Not taxing the wealthy is deadlier

And where they gonna go? Sure, a bunch might fuck off to Costa Rica or some other accommodative place, but those countries only have so much capacity to support the wealthy without the locals eventually demanding their cut. These people act like they’re gonna go to some tax free utopia out there beyond the ice caps like John Galt.

Here in the United States, you think assholes like Lutnick are gonna leave New York?

Please.

Fuck ‘em. Take the money.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Tax is bad, says rich guy who doesn't want to pay tax, and just arrived on his private jet, to enjoy some relaxation on his yacht, while half a dozen servants take care of everything for him, including wiping his ass.

Because billionaires getting their ass wiped, is good for the economy, average people living decent lives is not. Don't believe the evidence, believe the billionaires!

Next on:
Schools are bad for education, says 8 year old who doesn't want to go to school, but wants to play all day.

2% wealth tax on fortunes worth more than €100m has been proposed by Gabriel Zucman, an economics professor who has become a household name in France.

This in my opinion is a very moderate suggestion. I would like 1% from €5m-100m too. If you have €5m you already have more than you need.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 26 points 1 week ago

I dunno, man, does that sound like a threat to anybody else? Bro's talking about tanking France if him and his lil' buddies have to build roads and fund hospitals. :( :( :(

[–] Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You see a lot of this coming from the rich and their lap dogs. But its never not been bullshit. Pick any country you want in the world. Force Amazon, for example, to pay its full share in taxes. The muppets will say "But then Amazon will leave, taking all those jobs with them!". So... they would leave a space in the market, right? So someone else would come along and replace them. You can apply this to any industry that tries to scare people with "but X would leave". Who cares? Theres always going to be someone looking to make money. And being able to make a fuck load of amazon money would be quite awesome. And thats even with paying fucking taxes.

And as for individuals threatening to leave X country, fuck um. We dont need them sucking up all the money anyway.

There needs to be an overhaul in our various societies. Its 2025, and the idea of billionaires in a world where children still starve to death is disgusting. No one needs billions. Hell, no one needs millions. The world, if we could all agree, should limit personal wealth to 100m. Thats it. Once you start earning, through any means, that puts your wealth, in any form, above that number, you pay a 100% tax rate. Or, you can just fucking retire, and let the next generation earn their fair share.

The poor are the majority. And the rich and powerful dont fear us nearly enough...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grte@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is the most disgusting kind of discrimination! The kind against me!

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Objection! It's devastating to my bank account"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What? Do these people need a reminder about what happens in France when the filthy wealthy become absolutely detached from the oppressed?

Here in Mexico, these assholes kept telling everyone, for 30 years, that raising minimum wages would cause hyperinflation. Six years after ignoring them and raising minimum wages, suddenly, 13.5 M Mexicans got out of poverty, and inflation is okay. Ignore these hacks!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] atk007@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

Wealth tax or Guillotine?

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Plenty of his money comes from France. He won't leave, if he does, others want that exploitable population he'd leave behind.

Fuck your hollow threats

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your honor I object!!

Why?

Because its devastating to my case!!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

The greedy weasel should pay his taxes and the French people do not fuck around when they know they are about to get screwed.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 20 points 1 week ago

Do it, France. The wealthy are leeches.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Isn't he the asshole who said he would help pay for that famous church that burned down a while ago and never gave them a red cent?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fermion@mander.xyz 18 points 1 week ago

The existence of an article specifically about his opinions on a theoretical tax shows just how disproportionate the power of being wealthy is. When is the last time any of you were consulted on a tax policy that would affect you?

[–] Fickle_Ferret@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Cats are a bane upon society." Says dog to newspaper.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Fuck off rich asshole. Tired of them acting like they know better.

Tax wealth not work.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Does being Europe's richest man imply that he would be the person who would pay the most wealth tax?

If so, the headline isn't going hard enough.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 15 points 1 week ago

you guys already don't have musk, trump, bezos, ellison, zuckerberg, trump! All of them choose not to live there due to your repressive laws! Do you want to lose arnault as well! If he leaves he may never become prime minister or president. Do you really want that?

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago

169bn?

Dudes upset about getting taxed at 0.5%

load more comments
view more: next ›