And after you move here you will still lose protection, because that's exactly what "America First" entails
this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
129 points (98.5% liked)
World News
50069 readers
2665 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
They should just play it like FoxCon did in WI. Many loud words and big promises. Got what they wanted and never actually did much of anything. Capitalist chefs kiss. Not like Donnie is going to care for 10 seconds after the speech is made.
I would absolutely not trust us to provide any protection, even IF they fold to the demand. The smart play here is to call the bluff. Because it is a bluff.
I feel bad for Taiwanese politicians. They can't afford to provoke a major tantrum from Trump. They still need to purchase American arms, even if the US can't be counted on to help in an invasion. Some performative flattery and groveling might be in order. If it was me, I'd swallow my pride and cite the impossibility of moving entire chip production chains instead.
Likely they'll just quote numbers of moving facilities to the U.S. for server production, which will be a restatement of numbers that were already given in past years that Trump can claim are from him. There are facilities that were built in Tennessee/Kentucky/Alabama that I know of for companies like Quanta who make the AI server racks for Meta, Google, and such. So they are already up and running and will show numbers that will show possibly hundreds of millions a day in sales. (Each new server rack is around 2-4 million, and that's just one line I know of)
They need to be talking to Saab Aero and EADS and Dassault and Rheinmetall and Hyundai Military and so on
Or do that and cite the decades of work and investment it takes to build that industry.
Seriously. Remove protection and the US will lose access to all the production when the mainland invades.
They already did in Wisconsin. Kind of that was just tsmc but....
I don't know. That may be why all the generals were recalled. Someone smarter negotiating Taiwan.
Huh? Given who’s running the show these days? Not likely.
Not them. The billionaires they take orders from
Why would Donnie protect Taiwan if he already has 50% of the chip production on-shore? Having 50% likely means having a completely Taiwan-independent supply chain. I feel like the only thing Donnie would achieve by pressing this issue is Taiwan's people shifting towards negotiations with PRC.
If the Taiwanese feel there's no deterrent against invasion on their side, then they'd feel there's little to stop China from taking them over over when they decide to. Then the question becomes how would that takeover look like. Violent, non-violent, autonomy, no autonomy, and so on. Getting a good deal becomes leas likely as time goes by and China catches up on the high tech front. So they'd prolly go for it sooner rather than later. Donnie can't help himself from helping his sworn enemies can he.
Remove the only reason we agreed to protect you or we won't protect you... FFS America would you please remove this party of morons from power already?
Sorry, we can't. Eggs or some shit.
TSMC and Taiwan have all the leverage. If China invaded Taiwan, the US would be fucked and semiconductor supply cripple the states, and all the stuff Trump is investing personal money in (crypto, AI, etc)
If the US wants a robust semiconductor industry, they should break Intel’s chip design and fab into two separate companies, and lean into more chip-act type investments.
Makes sense that they would be safer not moving production to the US. The US is clearly only a fair weather friend now. If the the regime has what they want at home then why care about others.
Stay with me here for a minute... Consider that instead, they could be granted Federal subsidies to expand their production of chips within mainland USA, instead of moving it from Taiwan to the U.S. This is, of course, assuming a sensible Presidential administration with non-insane, asinine policies which would encourage foreign investment and guaranteed the safety of said foreign labour advisors to train American operators and technicians from ICE (South Koreans apparently very unimpressed with their arrest and deportation despite valid work permits).
And once production is moved lose it anyway.
Sure, let them rub a magic lamp and a genie will create a factory in USA with 50% production capacity.
Clown ass country.
Not many Americans are smart enough to work at a chip foundry.