this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2025
297 points (98.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

44074 readers
1187 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The entire US economy is currently being propped up by growth in the AI/tech sector. And I am convinced that LLMs are fundamentally incapable of delivering on the promises being made by the AI CEOs. That means there is a massive bubble that will eventually burst, probably taking the whole US economy with it.

Let’s say, for sake of argument, that I am a typical American. I work a job for a wage, but I’m mostly living paycheck to paycheck. I have maybe a little savings, and a retirement account with a little bit in it, but certainly not enough that I can retire anytime in the near future.

To what extent is it possible for someone like me, who doesn’t buy into the AI hype, to insulate themselves from the negative impact of the eventual collapse?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's also funny how Lemmy is buying up this narrative.

The entire US economy is currently being propped up by growth in the AI/tech sector.

What's happening is that Dementia Don is curb-stomping the US economy. AI investments, mainly in data centers, are the only thing that still seems promising. When you are on a trek and someone leads you through Death Valley, while pouring out all the water, you shouldn't blame the last horse that still keeps going.

Putting the blame in the right place would certainly help, with a view toward the mid-terms.

Financially: Diversify. Make sure that you are not completely dependent on what happens in the US. But mind that Europe comes with its own imponderable risks (ie Putin). Same with China. Maybe some old leader dies and the new crew runs everything into the ground; they go to war with Taiwan, that sort of thing.

[–] StripedMonkey@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't know that the OP or anyone else necessarily disagrees with you here. It's one of the reasons that I believe we're fucked when the bubble pops. Every other sector is shrinking otherwise, which is only making the mania more extreme.

Trump has fucked the economy, but I don't expect the next administration to be able to pull off a miracle and fix the mess we've created within the next 10 years. Foreign relations and our status as the reserve currency are shot to hell. The US is going to have to answer for our behavior.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago

Those last two sentences are very alarming for anyone paying attention. The dollar bond market is currently collapsing, and we were THE defacto world power because of our soft power. Farmers around me are currently paying the price at China is buying up all the cheap land they can, and although I call them my friends,I can't help but feel a certain schadenfreude as I told them trump was evil 8 years ago and the only comeback they have is "but other countries were scared of us then!". Like their entire lives are nothing but a zero sum game, and now they can't sell their soybeans. I may be a terrible person, but at least I can read the tea leaves.

[–] amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

invest into real world assets instead of stocks. think of the infrastructure you'll need once everything stops working. food pantries, solar panels, ham radio, water purification, community self-defense, etc. basically solarpunk

[–] relianceschool@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is all great stuff to have on hand, but not relevant for OP's question. They're wondering how to prepare for the equivalent of the dotcom burst or the 2008 recession, not a grid-down scenario.

[–] amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

why I mention prepping and mutual aid strategies is because you can't pay for daily living expenses if there are no jobs and food becomes unaffordable. in 2008 millions of people became homeless so we need to learn from them how they survived

[–] relianceschool@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I don't see the AI bubble burst affecting people to the same degree; I think it'll wipe out a lot of investment portfolios, but non tech-sector jobs should be safe. I think it's useful to have some essentials on hand, but I wouldn't go on a buying spree if that means draining my savings; I'd rather have the flexibility of money. If it comes down to survival and you don't have savings, you could preemptively apply for lines of credit, use those to cover living expenses, and declare bankruptcy once they're wrung out. Not financial advice, but it's an effective stopgap.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I would like to point out it's only recent gdp growth being propped up by ai. It's not like our entire economy relies on ai.

[–] Infinite@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The seven primary companies that are trading around the same tens of billions of "investment" and "credits" are worth 34% of the S&P 500.

Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Nvidia, Meta, Tesla.

All of them are betting HARD, because CEO types think they can be first to market with the singularity and win. (That may be oversimplifying a bit, but every one of these companies is run by Nazi collaborators. Make stupid calls, win shitty reputation.)

[–] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

While true, those companies all have solid revenue streams that aren't directly related to AI. If a bubble pops they'll all suffer, but all of them were profitable before the AI boom and can survive without it. It's very different from the dot bubble because that was driven by speculation and many companies weren't making any profit back then.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Divest and buy labubu dolls.

There is a good reason why Warren Buffet is holding so much cash right now, he will be bargain shopping soon.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Still don't get this take.

Buying low only works if you can sell high.

At the rate we are going. Yer gonna have King Ratfuck fighting King Shit over a an empire of dirt.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago

You don't think halliburton made bank off of Iraq? I'm talking outside of the government contracts. A failing economy is good business if you're flush.

[–] Seefoo@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

This is how Berkshire has invested over the years. They try to time it, and buy the recession basically. When you're investing long term, you can either hold and ignore or sell early, losing a bit and buy again after the drop

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 90 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

And I am convinced that LLMs are fundamentally incapable of delivering on the promises being made by the AI CEOs.

As a, uh, atypical American, and someone into the ML scene and previously employed in an LLM dev job… I agree.

I don’t think ML is going away, as what’s been made so far are niche tools in the same way a hammer is, but the level of hype and conning is literally criminal.

If you can shift stocks around, take them out of indexes and put the cash in crash-resilient stocks like Berkshire Hathaway (which somewhat famously/infamously saves cash to buy dips during crashes), or Walmart. I’m thinking on such a “Noah’s Ark” basket for myself.

I’m not knowledgeable enough to comment on bonds, gold, or whatever else your savings may be in. But don’t believe a word anyone says to you about crypto.

Start saving a bit extra too, if possible, as the crash may not come for some time. And you want to avoid selling invested savings when the markets at its lowest.


On the tech side, you can get more into self hosting to not be so dependent on Big Tech. You're on the perfect site to learn that.

If you ask me, that even includes dabbling in open-weights ML stuff, as that might suddenly become a more marketable skill once all the OpenAI hype implodes, and companies sipping the Koolaid turn more practical/frugal.


Other than that… I dunno. Depends on your work and lifestyle, I suppose. I think this will be a bumpy ride no matter what we do.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 19 points 3 days ago (3 children)

What did you do in 2020, when everything shut for COVID?

What did you do in 2008, when the arse fell out of the housing market?

What did you do in 2000, when the dotcom bubble popped?

Chances are the answer was "just shuffle on as normal, carry on living paycheck to paycheck, possibly get a new job if you work for somebody badly affected". Odds are your pension pot will recover by the time you need it.

What do rich people do? They gamble. Watch The Big Short. You could try that, but chances are you'll lose money. "The markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent", as the old saying goes.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

“The markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent”, as the old saying goes.

Some made big money in 2008.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago

A lot more lost it.

Buy low when everything crashes and wait for it to recover in 3-5 yrs.

[–] CCMan1701A@startrek.website 9 points 3 days ago (12 children)

I haven't seen a job with a pension in the last 18 years being in the workforce.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 65 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 23 points 4 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 45 points 4 days ago

I am not an expert per-say on AI, but I have survived economic collapses. Kinda.

Here's what you can expect.

It will happen a lot faster and more sudden than you expect. It will be a few days of "uncertainty" and you will see reports on the market and spending and fear through investors, and then BAM everything goes deep red for a few days and then you suddenly get sent home from work.

Your job, no matter how skilled or stable or unrelated to finance or the stock market you may think it is- is NOT safe. In fact, service industry jobs are often the first to go, because when the market tanks and investors start pulling out money, one of the first, strongest effects we feel is that people with money immediately stop spending. If you install windows and doors, if you cut grass, if you clean or cook, expect people will suddenly start doing that themselves more and more. You may get laid off suddenly depending on how much reserve your company has.

There will be an immediate and overwhelming strain on state and city services. Unemployment offices, food banks, employment centers, and expect the media to create a LOT of hype around it to a destructive degree, there will be the same kinds of supermarket raiding like we saw with covid for no real good reason other than people feeling afraid.


What you should do now to prepare:

Have backup income plans. Even if modest, have some hustles ready to deploy. Get certified or see what you need to get certified ahead of time to do Uber and/or Lyft, people are going to be using ride sharing more because they won't be able to afford to drive or make car payments. Think about other services people are going to need if they don't have jobs - handyman work on the cheap, dog and pet care, unlicensed work you know you can do safely, etc. If you or your family can do art and crafts, set up an etsy market now before you're strained, open it up to international customers.

SAVE MONEY, have cash savings as well as bank savings, have gold too if you can swing it. Expect any accounts that are tied to investments to be frozen or even wiped out, such as 401k's and the like.

Whatever you can do to reduce debts and spending - pay down or pay off credit cards or cars if you can. Get your finances in order as much as you can, so figure out exactly what you're spending and what your margins are.

Stockpile canned goods and basic survival supplies ahead of time like it's the goddamn apocalypse. Seriously, have at least a month of dry goods and preserved food, you have some time (maybe) so start collecting canned food, sacks of dried beans and rice, toilet paper and soap, other supplies you buy regularly. This will give you a safety net if it gets bad, it's one less [major] thing to worry about as you shift around your expenses and priorities.

Get information ahead of time about where your local DES/unemployment offices are, and what's required to apply. Find out ALL the programs you can apply for, from, nutrition assistance to grants to stipends or tax credits for whatever your family situation is. You won't get through on the website, it will be crashed with traffic, so be ready to go stand in line with your paperwork. You will get some number of months of benefits if you qualify (requirements vary by state) and most likely after some political contention, congress will pass emergency funding for extensions and stimulus checks. But it won't last forever.

Go visit your nearest food bank now. Bring them some food and socks, get to know who runs things so that when it's your time to stand in line, they know you already and have good associations.

We don't really know how bad it could get. So get a gun. There may be civil unrest at some point. Our world is about two missed meals away from anarchy, or at the very least crime will increase and homes will get broken into, and police will likely be understaffed and overworked. You will be on your own.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 12 points 3 days ago

Buy other stocks, not American ones. They will also be affected but not as much.

If you are living paycheck to paycheck, you cant do anything.

[–] cAUzapNEAGLb@lemmy.world 37 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Hard assets make a lot of sense when paper assets do not.

Real estate and precious metals are the traditional hard assets. The stock market can implode, but a home will remain a home, an acre will remain an acre, an ounce will remain an ounce.

There are difficulties and risks and efforts required with hard assets, theres a reason why soft assets developed, but when things go wrong people trust what they can hold and walk on - and thus seek real estate and precious metals as they are certain and tangible.

With a little more trust in the system, there are softer assets available such as bonds, specifically treasury bonds, and there are etfs that attempt to exclude the ai bubble such as XMAG, or the sp500 but equally distributed instead of by market cap which increases diversity like RSP to reduce the fallout of the ai bubble pop

Theres a million ways to navigate a bubble, do the research and find confidence in your plan, and think about how you'll react in various scenarios, especially when the numbers go down or arent going as high as expected

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 38 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Real estate

I saw that you put a caveat in there about it, but I'm going to make it a little more clear.

If anyone here has lived through the dot.com bubble in Seattle (and probably the bay area), they'll have seen that real estate is great if it's paid for. If you go underwater on your loan and kicked out, which is how the banks got so much real estate in 08, you're fucked. There *are no general rules, but guides.

[–] nimpnin@sopuli.xyz 26 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In general, investing borrowed money is risky... People just don't realize they're doing that when they take on a mortgage.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 24 points 4 days ago

This reminds me that I wish there was a basic course on money and the systems around it, that explains everything like you just did. It's not magic, but it's obfuscated behind so many terms and people trying to sell content, that it's not a simple thing to figure out on one's own.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Real estate is a trouble prone investment normally, much less in this crazy market; I specifically wouldn’t want to touch that right now.

Can’t speak for metals, but also be careful there…

Thing about a bubble like this is you don’t know when it’s going to pop. I like the saying “the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent.”

What I’m saying is to be careful about going all in on more pure hedges. If this lasts another 4 years and one's into stuff like XMAG and metals, and they drop in a crash anyway, you may end up in a worse position than if you had held the S&P 500. I think a better perspective is to avoid “buying a hedge” and instead invest in companies (or other assets) one thinks will be productive and grow with the bubble or not. They’ll grow however long the bubble goes, and keep growing after.

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (4 children)

an ounce will remain an ounce

Buy cocaine futures, got it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

Don't have money invested in the stock market to prevent it from losing value during downturns

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I will be the contrarian in the room and say that you shouldn't really do anything different -- unless you know that you are going to need that money in the next year or two.

Let's take the S&P 500. Yes, we know there is an AI bubble, and the same 7 tech companies are knee deep in it. But it turns out that bubbles make money, until they don't. In fact, a good chunk of the growth in the S&P over the past two years has been in those 7 companies.. If you had made this bet 2 years ago, you would be a big loser now.

So what do you do? Don't panic sell. You can't time the market. Sell when you need the money for something else. Sell when you have a purpose. But don't be too upset when the bubble finally bursts, and it all dives 25% (or more!) . That was never real money anyway.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 29 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Normally I would agree.

But the weight of this one obviously hyped sector is measurably, historically huge: https://www.apolloacademy.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/ExtremeAIConcentration-090825.pdf

With a lot of “circular investment” reminiscent of previous bad behavior: https://www.axios.com/2025/09/25/nvidia-openai-investment-ai

Obviously don’t sell after a crash, or sell the absolute least you can to live; that is rule #1.

…But I think it’s prudent to save a bit extra and shuffle some investment out of the S&P 500 pre-emptively, as it’s starting to resemble an AI evangelism hype fund. I’m not that old/experienced, but I’ve never seen anything like this in the market, especially from my perspective in the ML tinkerer community where, ironically, it’s obvious how much this all stinks. All the academics know it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 3 days ago

Follow the classic financial advice of setting aside enough emergency savings for a period of unemployment and diversifying the asset classes in your investment accounts (eg, retirement, health, education savings) to align with your risk tolerance & goals.

I keep 6 months of emergency savings in a high-yield savings account & let a robo-adviser passively invest my other savings on autopilot. While that means losses with market downturns, all the advice I've read & studies they refer to that run simulations over historic data (including shocks, downturns, bubbles) say that impassively holding that strategy has historically come out gaining & beating inflation.

[–] Artisian@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago

Lots of reasonable personal advice here. I want to suggest some community driven ideas, though they're less fleshed out than I'd like.

Look into community and common gardens (and if they don't exist, start pushing for a local org to make such space). If you are renting, look into tenants unions (or consider organizing your own).

Invest some in food kitchens + homeless shelters now, while you've got something to share. Consider volunteering and becoming more familiar with the resources (you may not need it, but others could).

Consider broader political organizing. The people in power (even in local positions!) when the crisis hits will definitely matter. America gave big buy-outs to businesses during previous crashes; but it could payout to citizens just as easily. Lookup and start discussing policy solutions that could help insulate you and your community. Bring this up at a city council meeting. Write a county representative.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 days ago (12 children)

I do wonder...

With most economic crashes, the rich get even richer. This time it's different, though.

Right now, the top 8 richest men in the world have as much wealth as the bottom 50%. Homelessness world wide is at an all time high, and a huge swath of people can't afford all the basic necessities anymore.

If an economic crash happens now, will the 99% of the people finally wake up and just TAKE the resources from that 1%, like it or not?

What do billionaires think will happen to them once shit really hits the fan?

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

This time it’s different, though.

Why?

Homelessness world wide is at an all time high, and a huge swath of people can’t afford all the basic necessities anymore.

I highly doubt your homelessness stat. If it is at an all time high by any metric, it is almost certainly a statistical artifact from (1) increased homelessness in developed nations, where tracking is decent and (2) improved tracking in developing nations. Meanwhile the people who can't afford "basic necessities" are, again, in developed nations - places where the notion of what constitutes basic necessities would be considered grand opulance in many parts of developing nations.

Instead, the majority of people in the world have seen improvements to their quality of life over the past 20, 40, and 60 years. Improved water and sanitation systems, more robust and resiliant food systems, greater access to life saving medical care, huge drops in infant mortality, hugely increased access to technology and education.

If an economic crash happens now, will the 99% of the people finally wake up and just TAKE the resources from that 1%, like it or not?

This is, quite frankly, a ridiculous fantasy. The wealth of the top 1% primarily exists not in vaults of gold bars, but in the ownership of what are intangible human constructs. Particular segments of land (lines on a map); businesses (organized structures of people); intellectual property (literally just ideas).

Elon Musk, for example, has a large portion of his wealth in Tesla. Of course, Tesla has physical assets in its factories and such. But most of the value of the company is speculative - people expecting Tesla to be wildly successful in the future. The next part of its value comes from IP - the exclusive ownership of its various inventions and innovations. And another part comes from the organizational structure itself and the knowledge and intelligence of the individuals who make up that structure. At its root, the value of Tesla is the goose that lays the golden eggs (Musk's cult of personality and the expertise of the individuals that make up the business) and investor confidence that the goose will continue laying golden eggs. In your glorious revolution, presumably Musk will be beheaded, and all the Tesla employees will scatter to the far winds as the proletariat storms their offices. Without the stable interaction of these technical experts, no more innovation happens, and investor confidence dries up (assuming the investors weren't also beheaded). The wealth of Tesla, then, does not go to the people, but goes up in smoke.

A revolution premised purely on taking assets from the rich has a predictable ending: in the slim chance that the revolution succeeds, even if the tangible wealth is equally distributed to the people (also a slim chance), the engine that generated that wealth has been destroyed and, deprived of the ability to generate new wealth, the people eventually spend away their windfall and are left with less than they had before they started. This sort of phenomenon was literally the impetus for Adam Smith to write The Wealth of Nations. Spain had spent a couple centuries robbing the Americas of its gold via murder and slavery - enough to literally collapse the price of gold in Europe. And yet, during Smith's time, Spain was in dire financial straights while England was the world's predominant economic power. Why? Because England had invested in technology and had developed industrial factories. It had invested in public and private institutions (ie, structures of people) that would continuously generate new wealth, rather than relying on hoarding gold bars.

The "glorious revolution" fantasy, meanwhile, is largely counterproductive to the actual goal of improving normal people's lives and improving the equality of political and economic power, because it plays into the childish notion that if we just throw a big enough temper tantrum, then we will get our way. And maybe that might be true for a brief moment. It is certainly true for some children some of the time that if they yell and scream and cry enough, they will be given the ice cream they want. But they only get that ice cream because there is an adult there, listening to them cry, who has a job that makes money that they can then use to buy the ice cream. The problem is that, ice cream or not, at the end of the day the child is still a child, completely dependent on the adult to provide for all their needs and make all their important descisions. The child gains real autonomy in their lives not when they throw "The Glorious Temper Tantrum" - they gain it when they get a job outside the purview of their caregivers and are able to spend the money they make at that job on the things of their own choosing.

So, too, with average people growing out of the controlling influence of the political and economic elite. Independence is achieved via building things - communities, relationships, physical infrastructure, businesses, governments, unions - which can be relied on instead of the options presented to us by the elites. And building things takes time and effort. It doesn't happen overnight with a few molotovs and a good photo op - that's the narrative the elites want you to believe, the one they put in all the popular movies and tv shows, because it is the strategy that is absolutely sure to fail. The idea that The Great Battle will be followed by Happily Ever After serves the elites because it tells us that we will win when we just put in a reasonable amount of effort right at the very last moment, and then we can relax. This is not how the world works. No - the world gets better when people put in unreasonable amounts of effort right now to gradually improve things and build things bit by bit, and keep putting in that effort for years and years and years. Sure, maybe there will someday be a tipping point or a big marker in history that we can point to and say "ah, that's when things changed". But make no mistake - that moment can only happen, and will only lead to a better world after the fact, because of the long term, boring hard work of people who care more about building things to help their friends than destroying things to hurt their enemies.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›