this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
467 points (90.6% liked)

World News

51429 readers
2492 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

US President Donald Trump signed the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) into law Thursday, completing the passage of the largest military spending bill in US history—$901 billion, or over $1 trillion when combined with supplemental funding passed earlier this year.

The Senate voted 77-20 on Wednesday to pass the bill. The Democratic leadership, including Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York and Minority Whip Dick Durbin of Illinois, voted for the bill. They were joined by Senators Mark Kelly of Arizona and Elissa Slotkin of Michigan, both of whom released a video last month calling on military personnel to disobey illegal orders—as Trump was sending the US military on a murder spree off the coast of Latin America.

Citing Trump’s statements about using troops to shoot protesters in America, Slotkin invoked the legacy of the Nuremberg tribunals, which convicted Nazi leaders for war crimes and crimes against peace. But when it came time to vote, this invocation was revealed to be completely meaningless. Slotkin voted to hand Trump the resources to pursue his military adventure against Venezuela...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 61 points 4 days ago (5 children)

The world under capitalism is so twisted that war is good for the economy. Let's start using ecology as a measuring stick. That money thing is old and worn out and it shows us humans to be fools.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

war is good for business

peace is good for business

volatility/uncertainty is even better, for those who know how the casino actually operates

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 39 points 4 days ago

Two wings same facist bird

Obscenely corrupt. These people shouldn’t be helping Trump on a single bill…even if he placates them with what amounts to a jobs program. Not a single vote until ICE is gone and he starts following the law…just for starters.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 15 points 3 days ago

Congress has been passing this spending authorization bill every year since 1961.

Notably among House Democrats, it's mostly the New Democrat Coalition (older, moderate, Clinton era 3rd way) voting for this & the Congressional Progressive Caucus (newer, liberal, progressive) voting against it. They're a big tent party.

Vote New Democrat Coalition Congressional Progressive Caucus
Yea 62 22
Nay 18 59

Senate Democrats were likewise split with 28 for & 18 against with the more progressive tending to vote against.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 78 points 5 days ago (2 children)

But god forbid we give people food, housing, or health care.

But those aren't fReEdOmS according to all the fragile egod snowflakes in under armor and grunt style tshirts

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

More war = less people = more food for the survivors. It's simple maths {taps head }

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago

Well, so much for universal healthcare.

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Why am I suddenly reminded of that moment from Attack of the Clones when Chancellor Palpy was given unlimited war rights.

I live in NW Ohio and the Ohio Air National guard has been flying maneuvers daily for months. I have the disturbing thought in the back of my mind this is all a military buildup for when the orange nazi pulls the US out of NATO next year to "celebrate" the 250th bday of the nation and starts doing what Germany did with the outbreak of WW2

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

The Empire in Star Wars literally represents the US. The rebels represented the Vietnamese.

[–] killea@lemmy.world 132 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (7 children)

The sooner every American realizes that there is NO ONE in the government with the desire and the power to help us, the better.

Edit: VOTE and be educated, but don't expect anyone therein to be accountable and reponsible. Get ANGRY about that.

[–] DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 49 points 5 days ago (12 children)

This is a dangerous narrative. Many people are not voting because this narrative the two sides are the same. They can do a lot in common but they are definitely not same. This year alone proves it.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 39 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (6 children)

I simple don’t understand why anyone buys the sentiment that you are an expressing here. The unfortunate truth is that, in every substantive way, it is true that the two parties are in lock step. I am aware that Democrats will sometimes use rhetoric that implies that they have more enlightened positions on some issues. However, it’s not credible when they consistently cave, pre-compromise, and shift rightward at nearly every opportunity. I’ve been observing the party, from within and without for 40 years. I’ve come to the conclusion that as an organization, the party as currently organized, has NOT A SINGLE principled stand on any policies whatsoever. Let me be explicit: there is no issue on which Democrats organizationally are not willing to compromise or flip on including: abortion, civil rights, democracy, and so on. They are a loose conglomerate of self-interested corporate sell outs, period. Are there a few individual exceptions, of course. But as a collective, the party is trash, and they are the reason that fascism has been allowed to progress in this country for decades.

What is needed is a wholesale reconstruction of that party. Replace nearly everyone in power and completely reject corporate funding. BTW, accomplishing that involves two things: 1.) voting, and 2.) rejecting the voices that demand that we lower our standards for short term political expediency.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Slotkin will do whatever is best for Israel, every time, as will Schumer.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 64 points 5 days ago (5 children)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Schumer is such a douche bag

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 20 points 5 days ago (21 children)

While its good to know mine voted no, the end result still sucks.

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

I'm starting to think that the republicans and democrats are just one party and, as George Costanza says, "They're scattin' and be-boppin' all over us!". They only have allegiance to themselves, not the citizenry.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

WHY DIDN'T THE REPUBLICAN MAJORITY STOP THEM?!!???!¡????

[–] Tilgare@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (6 children)

What? The news calls out dems because it's already safe to assume that the R's are doing everything their dear leader demands as always. The dems betrayed their constituents again, that's the only thing news worthy thing here.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A world war you say? Golly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 27 points 5 days ago (31 children)

The world socialist website parrots Chinese Communist Party propaganda only, they even support China's aggression against Taiwan and Russia's invasion of Ukraine, among other things. This is not a reliable media source.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/world-socialist-web-site/

This site says it's a mostly factual American leftist outlet with zero failed fact checks in the past five years. Even highly factual outlets like Reuters have distributed state propaganda.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No, that's just silly, of course Democrats would hold the line and vote against such measures!

Unless...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tooLikeTheNope@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It is just a distraction from the epstein files /s

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›