this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
467 points (90.6% liked)

World News

51429 readers
2193 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

US President Donald Trump signed the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) into law Thursday, completing the passage of the largest military spending bill in US history—$901 billion, or over $1 trillion when combined with supplemental funding passed earlier this year.

The Senate voted 77-20 on Wednesday to pass the bill. The Democratic leadership, including Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York and Minority Whip Dick Durbin of Illinois, voted for the bill. They were joined by Senators Mark Kelly of Arizona and Elissa Slotkin of Michigan, both of whom released a video last month calling on military personnel to disobey illegal orders—as Trump was sending the US military on a murder spree off the coast of Latin America.

Citing Trump’s statements about using troops to shoot protesters in America, Slotkin invoked the legacy of the Nuremberg tribunals, which convicted Nazi leaders for war crimes and crimes against peace. But when it came time to vote, this invocation was revealed to be completely meaningless. Slotkin voted to hand Trump the resources to pursue his military adventure against Venezuela...

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] handsoffmydata@lemmy.zip 18 points 5 days ago

Choose your political flavor (must choose one or self righteous assholes online will blame society’s problems on you for not voting instead of the neoliberal billionaires who control the politicians)

Republican: 🇺🇸✝️💣 Democrat: 🏳️‍🌈💅💣

[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 17 points 5 days ago (12 children)

Isn’t this the site with the socialist AI garbage?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] devolution@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (7 children)

see, this is why we say voting won't solve your problems. don't hate the messenger.

you could use rethinking instead of blaming russians or tankies or whatever.

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Voting doesn’t make a difference at this level, because where it did make a difference, they failed to vote.

There’s only one solution the US has to get out of the hole it’s in. Progressives must vote out the problem Democrats in primaries, which means they all have to vote in that, then vote those people in, come the elections. It’s the only way the US can get where it needs to be to make the changes socialists want. The US doesn’t have the systems in place like ranked choice to do things differently.

You don’t have a choice. You’ve got to vote your way out of it, if you get another chance.

The only other way is the one some think they want but they actually really don’t, which is not likely to work the way they want anyway.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] EtAl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

They can't give that to Trump. How is Elon Musk going to become the world's first multi-trillionaire?

[–] CatAssTrophy@safest.space 7 points 5 days ago

If you pick the right currency, Musk is already the first multi-trillionaire!

[–] presoak@lazysoci.al 1 points 3 days ago

We're helping them be free but it's actually for the oil and now a bunch of my friends are going to get killed and messed up.

Didn't we already do this a few years ago?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›