this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
158 points (91.1% liked)

Technology

77925 readers
2814 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Why would I want AI to play the game other than for testing?

https://nitrogen.minedojo.org/

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I could see this being useful for those with disabilities like muscular dystrophy. Maybe let the AI handle repetitive, input-heavy parts and take over the gameplay at key moments so as to minimize muscle pain.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wouldn't mind playing games co-op with AI.

[–] pogmommy@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ive got incredible news for you

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Few games actually have that and even fewer have ones that play well.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

So many games have companions tho. Most of the time, I don't want them but they are forced upon me. Such as in Wo Long or Skyrim.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm talking about games where they're designed for humans to play together.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, I have found that It Takes Two really only takes two controllers and beat it all by myself with these two hands. 😤

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That sounds awful, but then again not as awful as dealing with my wife trying to aim

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why would I want AI to play the game other than for testing?

Beat Elon in PoE

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago

I don't need AI to do that unless I am actually playing against the dude he pays to play for him.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 69 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why the fuck is AI always being applied to only parts of society that are fun?

[–] aurelar@lemmy.ml 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So you can spend more time working shit jobs for shit pay. Aren't you happy? 😊

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago

AI took that too! Oops all joblessness! 🤩

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I want LLMs to be used to create thousands of characters that have agency in like, Skyrim or something, and to watch the absolutely unhinged fucking chaos of what it creates.

I don't want it to play games for me.

[–] LettyWhiterock@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't even want that, I'd rather a game have its characters and writing created with intent by a person who cares.

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

If you use ai as an additive technology rather a replacement to things then really cool, ethical oppurtinitites open up for its use.

Rather than training a voice actor for a small handful of npcs that say the same four lines ad infinitum,pay them the same amount to License their voice, train a model, and use that for the game. Pair this with an LLM and suddenly you have pcs capable of saying all kinds of hillarious shit.

Have the coders that always write box behaviour to write the behaviour of npcs. The give players the option to talk them into doing some weird LLM powered shit.

Like. You can use ai to add things to games. It doesn't have to replace people's

I think a part of why people hate it is that idiots are trying to use it to replace things people do.

Where it's best is when it does things people can't

[–] LettyWhiterock@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

I'm going to be honest those do not sound like good uses. I want games to be designed with intent, not on the spot by an LLM.

[–] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

That would be so freaking cool

[–] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Bold to assume having an AI play the game for testing is actually useful. Given how buggy games release nowadays i genuinely wonder which companies still properly have play testers. An AI whose results you mostly ignore is pointless.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

An AI whose results you mostly ignore is ~~pointless~~ good for driving up the share price artificially

ftfy

[–] thatsTheCatch@lemmy.nz 6 points 2 days ago

I suspect it's not a lack of playtesters that's the problem, but harsh deadlines and crunch. That type of environment leads to tech debt to get things working fast, which leads to hard-to-manage code, which leads to bugs...

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 171 points 3 days ago (10 children)

I want AI to do my chores not play my games.

Sorry, AI must only be inserted into places it isn't actually wanted.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 42 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Right? Like, figure out how to sort and fold laundry.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 98 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Great! Now the AI can play the video games for me while I do the dishes. I swear it was the other way around in the SciFi.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 31 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Shut up and get back down the mines or your robot manager-security-cop will have to terminate you. Meet your billionaire-enforced quota and you'll live to enjoy another day of mining.

[–] mPony@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Merry Christmas from Chiron Beta Prime :) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3DyxaCYlfg

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 86 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Game companies: spend millions fighting cheating and cheat software.

Nvidia: here comes AI game assist!

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 46 points 3 days ago

Next: game companies can subscribe to NVIDIA anti-AI-cheating AI. This is innovation under capitalism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 52 points 3 days ago

That’s cool. AI can do art and writing and video games for me. It can watch all my shows. All I have to do is work and maybe sleep. Sounds fun.

[–] MoreZombies@quokk.au 25 points 2 days ago (3 children)

How much legal trouble would I get for kicking a CEO in the testicles? it feels like it would be worth it if I ever met NVIDIA's bosses.

[–] Evil_Incarnate@sopuli.xyz 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hydrashok@sh.itjust.works 48 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Y'all laugh but there are way too many people into idle games, not to mention people who prefer watching a stream (even without commentary) over playing a game itself.

I cannot comprehend why, though, just like I can't comprehend how cheating (particularly single player) can be fun.

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago

Cheats in single player games is a blast.

It gets old quick but it's fun for a while.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 16 points 3 days ago (7 children)

how cheating (particularly single player) can be fun

Have you never played a game with unreasonable grind that saps all the fun out of it ? Often just to drive player hours and 'engagement'. Multiplayer cheats however can die in a fire.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] KelvarCherry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I was laughing along until you said "watching a stream (even without commentary)". Yeah I've done that one. Sometimes I want to see what's next in the game without spending 100 hours to get there ><. Also watching lets me mentally unwind, playing takes a mental toll.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TriangleSpecialist@lemmy.world 42 points 3 days ago

I guess Elon won't be needing gamers' services to max out his characters anymore.

Fucking AI taking valuable jobs away again.

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Great, another fun thing the LLM craze want to take from me. FFS.

[–] mPony@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

that and the polar ice caps

[–] morto@piefed.social 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The age of ai-generated streamers is coming...

People and corporations will automatize all the process and turn it into passive income, and a lot of people will somehow watch it, making the thing profitable.

I'm tired of all this...

A Minecraft and Roblox streamer tried that a year ago, primarily as a pitch to investors to make a service for other streamers to make AI-generated content. His name is Kwebbelkop. This guy managed to make the laziest brand of content I have ever even heard suggested as an idea: An AI avatar reading an AI reaction to an AI-generated image. And I thought reaction videos were bad...

I'm tired of all this...

[–] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago

AI will do all the fun and creative things for you so you can get back to work

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

Apart from games, where this can also be used for more capabable and behaviourally more "interesting" NPCs (including computer opponents or teammates), the used techniques can be transferred to robotics. Quite a cool architecture.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Actually if they can use that to make good ai opponents for 4x games, it'd be pretty sweet

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›