this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
343 points (97.8% liked)

World News

51798 readers
2494 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

European NATO leaders have issued a joint statement that "Greenland belongs to its people" and it is for the Arctic island and Denmark only to decide on its future, after President Donald Trump's administration reiterated its wish to take control of it.

The statement said that NATO and its allies had increased its activities and investment to make the Arctic a safe place and that Denmark and Greenland were part of that alliance.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

This will always lie at the feet of American voters. For failing at more than just this election.

C’mon, bring on the downvoters, pissers and moaners, excuse makers.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not downvoting. You aren't wrong.

The US election system has been fucked a long time. That's also true. It disproportionately supports conservatives.

That said, he really did get something like 75 million votes. 75 million trashy people living in the US who are still out there looking at this bullshit and saying "I voted for this." There is no excuse for that.

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

The system isn’t great but there is still a way to get the people they need in. The Republicans prove this pretty much every election.

It disproportionally serves conservatives because others didn’t and don’t vote.

It’s been on the voter for a long time. Excuses too; in 2016 and earlier it was ‘our right not to’ now it’s ’we can’t because jobs/timing/whatever’.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

That is an oversimplification. The disproportion is literally that: the Electoral College means people in states which have higher populations get lower representation. And higher populations tends to mean bigger cities, which (worldwide) tends to mean more left than right.

The Republicans get the people they need in exactly because of this disproportionality.

Also true that relatively few USians vote -- and that's at least partially related to having no national voting holiday, plus elections on Tuesdays instead of weekends. It is literally in the Republican platform to have fewer people vote. They've just been successful at it for a long time.

RE 2016 and earlier, I have not seen that pattern.

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

We need to bring Ukraine war to an end ASAP

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I'm starting to think trump and putin are working together on this- if they keep Europe occupied and distracted the orange man can sneak in and take Greenland under their noses. I hope we're in a spot where we can turn things around for the better, but I fear things are about to turn for the worse globally in the next couple years.

[–] Nebraska_Huskers@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (5 children)

If us troops invade Denmark. I will actively root for the murder of us troops by the people of Denmark. As an American, make an example of us

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 2 points 20 hours ago

It won't be murder. It'll be self defense of an invading army. And any American soldiers that go along with this highly illegal order will very much deserve it and I hope they die.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

finger twitching over the little foam hand that says "Death to America"

Don't make me do it, I'm warning you.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It makes me sick to think about the US invading Greenland, and Canada is literally unthinkable. But if you believe for a second the US will be made an example of, I'm sorry but you're just mistaken. As much vitriole as we might have toward the current leadership, the US is very strong and very capable, and the rest of the world knows that, and I'm not sure anyone wants to bear the cost of going to war with the US. They'll have to decide if the cost of losing a Greenland, for example, is greater or less than the cost of a potential war with the US. And realistically, it's less. Which is concerning.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Are you quoting Neville Chamberlain?

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 1 points 19 hours ago

The same situation didn’t exist then; in fact the parity was in reverse.

In no way was Nazi Germany more powerful to such a degree over Britain and France.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm just some dude on the internet with an opinion, nothing I say matters.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

I need to have this on the bottom of each of my posts. Bring back forum signatures.

Problem with that is, bullies never stop. Just like Russia, and Hitler before him, you give Trump what he wants when he bullies you and he will just take more.

The cost will be greater. Next he will demand Iceland. Then Portugal. Then pootin attacks Poland. When do you fight back? When no one's left but you?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'll believe they mean it when the US military base in Greenland is evicted.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

That's what he wants. He'll claim that as a provocation and use it to expand the US military coverage in the area. His MO is to do abhorrent things until someone snaps, and then point at that someone and claim they caused it. And something like 70 million morons in the US completely buy it and have the memory span of goldfish.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The alternative is do nothing and you get the Venezuela treatment anyway.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Oh, 100%. I'm not suggesting to do nothing. But no-win scenarios exist.

[–] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 98 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Defending a country's territorial integrity is not defiant; if anything, the country threatening that integrity is the one acting in a reckless, defiant, and dangerous manner.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 21 points 2 days ago

Defiant in the face of a would-be oppressor

[–] howl2@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago

Yeah that choice of words didn't sit right with me either.

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 32 points 2 days ago (5 children)

A joint statement is great, but it's still words. I fear Trump and Putin aren't taking the EU very seriously because we're mostly words.

These words would carry a lot more weight if people believed Europe would back them up. And the most obvious way to do that, would be to liberate Ukraine. A Europe that liberated Ukraine from Russian occupation is more easy to believe when they say they will defend Greenland as well.

The issue here is to dissuade the US and Russia from even trying.

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well moving EU troops into Ukraine would rapidly cause Russia to go to war with the EU, and in short order, US would be forced to make a decision as part of NATO.

Unfortunately I suspect the US would use the moment to backstab the EU, abandon them, and attack Canada, Greenland and Mexico, since no one could come to their defense.

We need an alliance with China.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Russia is struggling with Ukraine. They cannot deal with the EU. Even without the US.

Biggest problem here is that the US may actually just try back out of NATO (in action rather than treaty) and basically abandon Ukraine and straight up back Russia.

Though with Venezuela and now the threats on Greenland, it will be hard for us (the US) to claim that we have no appetite for war. Which has been the biggest excuse to ignore our allies.

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Did you read the US national security policy they just released? Have you been listening to everyone over the last few days? They make it very clear they intend to secure the Western hemisphere because they think it belongs to them. Your country thinks my country belongs to you. Trump is very likely going to move on Greenland, and once the pretense is gone I imagine he would do exactly what he claims to want to do, in formal policies and all over the media.

I don't know why Americans seem to think "oh he's just joking this time". A rule of thumb: If it involves making people's lives worse, he's not joking. He wants to control the Western hemisphere and if he has to kill millions to do it, he will.

You're in denial if you don't think Trump is going to drive the world to war. Or maybe you happen to believe that my country does in fact belong to the US?

[–] halferect@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm American and I didn't think he was joking during his first term and this term I fully expect that in a month the US will take Greenland, I don't know anyone who thinks Trump is just a Lil goofy guy making goofy jokes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

More specifically, Russia can't deal with a united EU. They might be able to deal with us one at a time, and we have a tendency to be divided. If there was ever a time we need to set aside our differences and recognise that we need to act together and decisively, it is now.

And we need to wrap up Putin's crappy war in a way that keeps Ukraine strong and on our side, so we will be stronger, and we can be prepared to deal with the US if Trump goes for Greenland.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Janx@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Greenland is a legal property of NATO member Denmark. Experts are saying a forceful annexation or invasion there would collapse the alliance and end NATO. You know, the major thorn in Trump's handler Vladimir Putin's side? The check against invading smaller countries, and the alliance he's been railing against for years...? And the only thing that's stopping him from increased aggression against other countries near him? This shit's so obvious and out in the open. There's no consequences, so they don't even have to hide it anymore...

[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

So, it doesn't change your point, but "legal property" isn't really the right word for an entity that makes up it's own laws and can ignore the laws of everywhere else. I'd stick with "territory", because it's about their local monopoly on the use of force, and mutual recognition by other sovereign powers.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The orange felon/rapist doesn't care a wit about sternly worded letters.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

The orange rapist also doesn't care about someone saying "no".

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Strongly worded letter. We know this is not what Trump and his ilk respond to. They're going to have to find some form of material leverage, if they have any, to strengthen the argument.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 32 points 2 days ago (4 children)

That's not so hard. Ban silicon valley social networks. Put a heavy tax on any digital goods and services with a headquarter in the USA. Trump is very sensitive to those. Then move on to put tariffs on physical goods. Cancel orders of USA military products. That's a good beginning.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 13 points 2 days ago

Could start there based on the threats alone.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

Why aren't they doing these things already? Because Trump has made a deal with the devil so nobody imposes consequences on him for anything ever

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] obinice@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (2 children)

An attack on one of us is an attack on us all.

Regardless of the outcome for us Europeans, good or bad, the USA invading a NATO nation will mean war. Hopefully a phoney war that's resolved quickly, but regardless, war. Period.

The question is, are they willing to burn every single alliance and friendship they have, and start a literal third world war, just to annex Greenland?

And for what reason? If they wanted more military presence there (they already have some, don't forget) they could just ask, Denmark is their friend and ally (not that the USA remembers this or cares about alliances any more), and would be open to discussing the details and sorting things out.

It seems like the actions of a deranged madman, not the calculated moves of an intelligent, purposeful world power.

[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I have a feeling that EU contries would act with as much resolve as was done with Ukraine. So if Greenlanders can't fight by themselves for a couple years, other EU nations will have no one to donate helmets to.

They would also be more hesitant to make Trump mad than they were ever afraid of upseting Putin.

No one has an apetite for war. Even when it is necessary for your future security. Only dictators are fine with war.

[–] myserverisdown@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

You can't make a comparison to Ukraine and the Russian invasion. Ukraine isn't a NATO member nation, whereas Denmark is.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Damage@feddit.it 16 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Suprised to see Meloni along them

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 2 days ago

More surprised at starmer being there honestly

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] majari42@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Came across this clear reason why the child rapist has set his eyes on Greenland and no media is talking about: He wants Greenlands precious metal since they designed their gate keeping primary military spearhead (F35) with one little flaw: it needs a rare metal only widely available in China... https://youtu.be/ng4cwPNIag0

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The dude is really asking to get got; lives in a country with millions of guns and talks like the SS hasn't fucked up before.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I really had to pause at the SS part.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

The parallels are drawn intentionally.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›