this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
565 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

69247 readers
3685 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 45 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

The level of short sightedness in this pursuit is laughable, even if it's coming from corporate.

You pirated a song?

Well then, we're going to cut off your internet so that we can never effectively market anything we make to you ever again.

We'll gladly lose out on all the revenue you normally spend on corporate movies, tech, and content because we'd rather hyper fixate on the pennies of lost revenue that mp3 cost us, than ever worry about the macro economic conditions of the real people it comes from.

Fucking LOL.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

It’s the same idea as “death penalty will scare people out from committing murder”

The hope is the threat will stop new people from getting into that

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 9 points 3 hours ago

My Google account that I had for 15+ years got banned from YouTube when I let my 9 year old play around making edited videos. He'd mash up clips from PBS Kids and other places. Apparently PBS didn't like this and after a couple of vague warnings, my account is banned from YouTube for life, no actual chance of appeal. Of course I could just ditch it and open a new account under another name, but I'm stubborn, over seven years have passed and they're still silent on the issue. I can watch YouTube, but not comment or post videos. Oh well.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Death penalty is an ineffective deterrent mostly because people tend to commit the crimes it's used as a punishment for while not thinking, or caring, about the consequences at all.

Now, forget cutting off the internet, if you'd get the death penalty for getting caught pirating music, it would prove to be a very effective deterrent at stopping it. I guarantee, zero piracy after a few years.
A lot smaller population left to buy the legal media too, though, but hey, no pesky pirates!

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 hours ago

Death penalty is an ineffective deterrent mostly because people tend to commit the crimes it’s used as a punishment for while not thinking, or caring, about the consequences at all.

People pirate for not caring about the consequences

Death penalty for its use cases though is getting off easy. That’s why you find people killing themselves either with murder-suicide or suicide in prison

It’s like “what if we gave you no punishment at all”

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

For me it's having a kind of Streisand Effect.... Is there a mass torrent of just Sony songs I can grab? Cus fuck em, I want it just out of spite

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 5 points 5 hours ago

Forget marketing. They want every game to require logging in to their servers. You won't even be able to buy or play their games.

[–] terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

They plan on suing all the ai companies too?

[–] vane@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

They won't sue their intelligence providers

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

They could but let's be honest, the AI companies have no capital to take. They're just one big ponzi scheme waiting to collapse as soon as new investors stop coming in faster than they leave.

[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 15 points 6 hours ago

Spectrum had a policy like this at one point. They'd shut you off after a couple of instances of p2p that were reported. Afterwards, they directed you into a captive portal with some plausible deniability where you had to say "I don't know what happened, but it won't happen again".

Nowadays they just send you an email but don't restrict access.

Either way the Internet isn't too safe, protect yourself with at least a VPN.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

Cut us all off, so corporate can use internet, what they meant to use it for. Corporate Porn.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 hours ago

Um, has there ever been a time Sony, the rootkit DRM company has not called for state intervention to enforce IP laws regarding Sony holdings? (All the while Sony pirates anyone else's stuff.)

This is like the news that Comcast objects to municipal areas opening up Comcast monopoly regions to new ISPs. Sony is almost as bas as Nintendo when it comes to their franchises.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

Get a vpn provider. Set the location as the Netherlands. Set up a docker container with deluge and openvpn, and set it up to use your vpn provider.

Voila. You only need run your torrent traffic through the vpn, and it’ll be on its own kill switch.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 5 points 5 hours ago

That's like cutting wizards off from their source of magic

[–] Teknikal@eviltoast.org 40 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I've never forgiven Sony for decades deleting an account with paid for expensive games on it, they claimed inactivity for 6 months and UK law meant they had to.

No other account (with purchases) I have has ever just got deleted on me and you better believe Sony are never getting a single penny from me again.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Microsoft stole my copy of minecraft when they bought it

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 28 points 10 hours ago

Fuck you Sony...

Signed a lifelong pirate.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 8 points 8 hours ago

Haha the US is so fucking dumb bro I can't

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 11 points 10 hours ago

You can just download a house now:

https://free3d.com/3d-models/house

[–] primemagnus@lemmy.ca 32 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Reason #56,789 of why Sony is on my permanent embargo list since 2002. They treat their customers like absolute shit. And they pay their bills.

If Sony is involved you know it’s straight sleaze. If there was an award for most evil company, they’d be leading.

Sony's part of the fine was raised by a third for trying to obstruct the investigation by refusing to answer inquiries made by the EU officials and shredding of evidence during the multiple law-enforcement raids.

From their part in the videotape price fixing snafu back some 20 years. That’s how they roll.

[–] sep@lemmy.world 17 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Sony would be in the running. But i think nestle would beat them on the top spot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] The_Caretaker@lemm.ee 61 points 14 hours ago (12 children)

I won't use a phone company that listens to my calls and criticizes me for who I speak with. I won't use an internet provider that monitors what I download or shares that info with third parties. The only other way to catch someone downloading, is if an agent of the copyright holder is uploading the torrent file.

If you hire private security to give me free beer outside of your store, you can't accuse me of shoplifting because I accepted the free beer.

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 28 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

So you're saying you have a choice in ISPs? Sounds pretty cool.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

My area has around 3 or 4 competing ISPs. (Canada)

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 26 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It costs a holiday and a nice dinner to make the SCOTUS say "um, ackchually, the constitution doesn't say anything about access to the internet".

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 hours ago

As an aside that's one of the major things I've never understood about how SCOTUS developes rulings, ie: how they use 'original intent' to figure out current issues.

[–] arararagi@ani.social 6 points 9 hours ago

That's dystopian, good luck finding a job besides servicing without internet.

load more comments
view more: next ›