this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2026
35 points (72.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

48555 readers
677 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have a fair bit of construction tools (DeWalt brand) but the batteries are damn expensive

Is it unethical to buy the cheaper compatible batteries

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BertramDitore@lemmy.zip 93 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It’s unethical for companies to force you to buy overpriced essential parts. If you find a compatible battery for cheaper, there’s no reason not to buy it. Unless the company prevents third-party batteries from working in their products...

Nothing unethical about finding a better price.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Are the cheaper batteries better than the expensive ones? If not, dewalt is charging you for a superior product, which is fair IMO. Is the difference big enough to justify the difference? That’s up to the customer to decide. If the difference is not worth it, just buy the cheaper one instead.

Is any of this ethical? Probably not. I suspect both manufacturers have poor labor practices and a negative environmental impact. The way I see it, consumers are destroying the planet through indirect means for the most part. Directly, if you're burning gasoline, and indirectly, when you're buying stuff from various companies. Those companies are directly destroying the planet buy burning stuff, leaking toxic chemicals into the groundwater etc. If you're worried about ethics, you might want to look into the environmental impact these two companies have. If you're serious about this, you might need to do a proper life cycle analysis of the entire production chain, but that's a topic for another thesis.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The cheaper batteries may have a lower true Wh capacity.

But given the cost difference, I've found they have a much higher value - I get 80% of the capacity for 30%-50% of the cost.

And you always want to have at least 2 or more batteries to ensure sufficient runtime.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] socsa@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You have to keep in mind that power tool batteries are kind of the worst case scenario when it comes to lithium battery safety because they get knocked around, shoved into tool boxes, crushed, etc. of all the consumer products most at risk of fire, tool batteries are up there. That's part of the reason they are so expensive. At the same time, knock off 18650 cells are generally well known fire hazards on their own.

I think it's up to you what your risk tolerances are, but if a DeWalt battery burns my house down, at least you have a company to sue. If the Temu battery does the same thing, you are going to be SoL. I've been building and repairing various kinds of packs for more than a decade and am quite wary of random bootleg cells. I've never had a real Panasonic or Samsung cell fail, only knockoffs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

I'm no kind of expert, but as I understand it, lithium-ion batteries are something to be treated with significant care & caution. Poorly-constructed ones for example are evidently more prone to developing filament damage and becoming exposed out of their protective cases, with the fire risk (in the presence of O2) scaling up by size. Actively charging from AC seems to boost that risk.

So it seems pretty clear to me-- research that sucker when you're buying replacement cells / batteries, or simply dealing with an old, poorly-performing one. Even if the risk of an Li+ cell event is less than 1% (or whatever), avoiding the disaster of that seems pretty wise to me. Personally, I charge my Android devices and my DeWalt module in a metal container, just in case. Also, old cells are stored in steel baking pans & similar.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 49 points 1 month ago

As unethical as buying the OEM batteries.

[–] volore@scribe.disroot.org 40 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

you mean, someone else found a way to do the exact same job but cheaper? According to capitalism, all is as it should be and you should rest easy buying the knockoffs.

More pragmatically speaking, from what I recall when I watched AvE (before he revealed himself as a canadian maga), the performance of knockoff batteries was in general adequate as long as you didn't expect the same low temperature performance. That's apparently where knockoffs and the legitimate batteries tend to differ, is when you've got to use them in freezing temperatures. So if you're planning on using your power tools in a frozen shithole, stick to buying legit batteries -- I know you were asking about the ethical concerns, but that's something else to keep in mind. but imo fuck DeWalt, they've already got their pound of flesh out of you buying the legit tools in the first place.

[–] Hayduke@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I do miss the old AVE. Pretty big bummer that he bought into all of that Covid and maga crap. Though his content was shifting away from my interest soon before that anyway, so it wasn’t a huge loss. Now if TOT or Bad Obsession starts bleeding stupid, it’s gonna sting.

[–] volore@scribe.disroot.org 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

oh good someone else remembers he went this way, too, I'm not just imagining it.

Personally I'm quite a fan of Peter Brown, Styropyro, Chronova Engineering, Attoparsec, and Robert Dunn's channels (the woodworking/maker channel Under Dunn, the car channel Aging Wheels, they're both fantastic), to name just a few of the better ones. I do genuinely miss AvE's storytelling abilities and Red Green style humor, but there are still lots of people who are enjoyable to watch who I don't think support fascists, or at least have the good sense to keep it to themselves.

[–] kahjtheundedicated@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I could only imagine BOM getting political if tea, biscuits, or funk were being banned

[–] Wanderer@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Say it isn’t so. AvE is MAGA?

[–] volore@scribe.disroot.org 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I knew someone was gonna ask me about this, so allow me to clarify: I don't know that for a fact, but I picked up on bits and pieces and you would too if you watched him long enough. The thing that made me say "yeah this dude's politics are probably problematic" was when he put out a video in support of the Freedom Convoy. He never came out and straight up said he loved Trump or Poilievre or whatever -- at least not up until then, but that was the point I stopped watching. But it was enough altogether that made me go "yeah nah I don't need to watch this dude I've got other 'make/do cool things' youtubers I can enjoy".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This feels like a trick question. 🤔

Am I missing something here? Where's the potential immorality behind it? Maybe if they're work tools and the cheaper batteries ruined the tools over time, sure, there could be an argument for it...

[–] mech@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The only way this could be unethical is if your employer gave you the money for buying original batteries and you bought cheaper knock-offs instead, pocketing the remainder.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 month ago

Corporations are not your friend. Ethics plays no part in it. It's economics. If they price themselves out of the competition, that's their problem, not yours.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The fact that someone even asks this question tells me there is something deeply wrong with the culture these days. No shade on you OP, I’m sure you are a good person. But it’s obvious that corporate propaganda has worked extremely well.

No, absolutely not, you are well within your rights to buy off brand and second hand equipment. Heck, I consider it a moral victory in avoiding the hellish markups the big brands put on their consumables.

Push back when kind of question comes up, we have to counter the propaganda, otherwise it will soon become law. I’m certain home tool manufacturers would move to a printer ink model in a heartbeat. It’s bad enough that there isn’t a universal battery mount as it is.

[–] RoddyStiggs@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 month ago

The fuck? Of course not.

Corporations aren't people. You can't harm them.

And even if they were, you wouldn't owe them loyalty.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Absolutely not. What's actually unethical is the ruinous prices the name brands charge for their "genuine" batteries which under the hood are just as much Chinese garbage as the off-brand ones.

[–] AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev 19 points 1 month ago

LOL no.

You are in no way morally obligated to go out of your way to protect some corporation's exploitative business model.

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What sort of circumstance could possibly make buying cheaper compatible batteries unethical?

  1. Did you make an express promise to only buy brand-name batteries? (I.e., are they paying you money to showcase their brand? Did you lease or rent tools with a contract that specified brand-name-only batteries? )
  2. Are you spending someone else's money who wants name brand batteries?
  3. Are the third-party batteries illegal in your country?
  4. Is there a known greater ecological harm in the manufacture of the third-party batteries?
  5. Are you expecting to have your power tools be harmed by the third party batteries and returning them for warranty repair you caused?

For a typical consumer in America, and likely most professional contractors, the answer is "no" to all of these. And DeWalt apparently only offers a one year warranty that specifically excludes "normal wear and tear".

https://www.dewalt.com/en-us/support/warranty

Anything up to and including prying open the proprietary casing and swapping in new cells is entirely ethical.

[–] thefactremains@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Inhumane labor to reduce costs

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 month ago

Why would that be unethical? I honestly don't even understand this question, of course it wouldn't be.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

unethical? no.

but depending on the batteries you're buying, could be a fire hazard.

[–] Justifier@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

That's called the other side of the coin of the free market economy. Capitalism.

You sell your tool's battery for $200/ah? Someone makes the same thing without the tag that is compatible with the same ah rating but without your warranty for $50 and I buy it from them, you lower your price or see your sales drop off a cliff

What you think anyone should actually subscribe to the Ethics for thee but not for me model?

BTW I'll be buying some aftermarket tabless 12ah batteries for my Ego tools when they kick and guess what I won't be paying for 6 of them.... $4,000

Yes, four. thousand. dollars.

I'll be spending less than $1,000.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No ethical consumption in capitalism….

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Absolutely not, crazy position to hold. Fyi you can buy orprint 3D adapters for a lot of things. My dyson runs on dewalt batteries.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 1 month ago

This might be what finally lets me buy a cordless crosswave.

It's unethical, because when you buy compatible batteries the DeWalt CEO may have to wait a month more for his second yacht.

/S

[–] OriginEnergySux@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

No, more like the other way around

It's unethical that companies constantly produce incompatible chargers and batteries that cause more pollution when lost, cut customer options, which after a few years when they no longer get made, cause even more pollution

[–] LuigiMaoFrance@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Intellectual property isn't real.

[–] GrayBackgroundMusic@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

I like TechDirt's rephrasing to call it imaginary property.

[–] Mannimarco@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago

This can't be a real question

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Of course it isn’t.

Those cheaper batteries are usually lighter in weight or a fire hazard though.

[–] kboos1@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Nope, why would it be?

The only concern that I would have buying off brand batteries is durability. They left something out to make it significantly cheaper and batteries are notorious for unexpectedly catching fire.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago

Why do you think it could be unethical?

[–] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The manufacturers of those off brand batteries are unethical because they almost always use inferior cells and less robust protection circuits, and in many cases have less than advertised capacity.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yep.

But my Wh per $ is so much better it's worth it.

Like I get 3x as many watt-hours per dollar, so while individual batteries may have a lower capacity, I get more run time total per dollar spent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] magnetosphere@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

No, but corporations that sell overpriced products absolutely love that you’re asking this question.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It is possible that DeWalt designs and manufactures its own batteries, and there is some clever tech in them that makes them superior to other batteries, or that they pay for high quality components that make them last longer.

However, it is just as likely that they buy the batteries themselves "off the shelf", put them in a custom plastic enclosure, slap their label on them, and sell them for an insane markup. Sometimes, they don't even need the custom enclosure and they just buy someone else's finished battery product. The "off-brand" option may be the exact same product.

It's not unethical to use off-brand batteries, but then if you buy a substandard one that causes a problem the manufacturer may use that as an excuse to deny their warranty claim. But when was the last time you replaced a tool under warranty?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

or that they pay for high quality components

This would be a valid choice for both the manufacturer and consumer, if it were true and transparent. Most of us have things we spend more on with the expectation of quality and that we spend less on with the expectation there is no quality

For example I don’t buy the concept that my printer manufacturer has magical ink in their resale cartridges. Even if they did, the 3-4 cartridges I can otherwise buy would make up for a lot of magic

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I can't think of a multinational corporation that deserves your loyalty in that way. It's up to you and me to determine if the markup is a brand name premium or a actual measurable quality improvement and direct our spending accordingly. I have had both good and bad luck and sometimes you don't even get a choice because there's only one battery option available.

I'm sure the companies would like it to be seen as unethical or even illegal, but most people I know (even older non-internet-savvy people) like having more options than just a greedy OEM for parts and service.

I think you can let your conscious rest easy knowing corporate would feed you headfirst into a meat grinder on Easter Sunday live on national television before they have your best interests at heart.

[–] NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com 5 points 1 month ago

It’s unethical that these brands get you into buying their tools and force you into their specific brand of battery when you never encounter that in stuff like a GameBoy that can use any brand of AA battery.

There are adapters on Amazon, such as ones I got, that allow my Ryobi tools to use Craftsman batteries.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I've bought several knockoff tools that work with DeWalt batteries and I have an adapter that lets me use a DeWalt battery in my old craftsman drill.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's more of a fire hazard than an ethical issue.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I've been using compatible batteries for years, never had a problem.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›