this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
44 points (85.5% liked)

politics

23428 readers
2519 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 6 hours ago

Well that's fucking scary.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Young men are feeling disenfranchised and are being drawn into a structure that they believe empowers them.

Could be worse... could be the military...

Oh, wait...

https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3953052/recruitment-rises-125-despite-ongoing-challenges/

"The Defense Department's armed services branches recruited 12.5% more people in fiscal year 2024 than in the year prior"

https://www.military.com/daily-news/2025/04/21/army-recruiting-upswing-service-hits-85-of-annual-goal-5-months-left.html

"As of last week, the Army had enlisted 51,837 recruits, or 85% of its 61,000 target for fiscal 2025, according service data provided to Military.com. A significant portion of that total -- roughly 14,000 -- comes from the service's delayed-entry program, or DEP, which is composed of recruits who signed up last year but are only now shipping out to basic training."

I hated their take on Ukraine, but Boy Boy had a pretty good video showcasing SOME of the content creators shilling for the army.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago

The army is a job. That could be motivation enough without him being some gun-clutching bully.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 points 15 hours ago

"Resurgence" is not an accurate description of a statistical plateau.

[–] RotatingParts@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Many young men want control and power. If they embrace religion and force it on others, they feel control and power.

[–] admin@lemmy.today -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I will call bullshit on that. Young men want hope and community just like everyone else. In the current socio-economic setting, it's not possible to find these organically; hence, religion plays a role. There are extremes in everything, and using extremes as a norm to define a group (in this case, young men) does no good.

And please don't argue with me about why this is only happening to young men.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Then why are they flocking to the military and the church instead of mutual aid organizations and general interest groups?

Plenty of people (including young men) want hope and community, and are finding it through means that don't involve violence and suppression. If you don't support violence and suppression on some level, you won't seek community with people who do.

Does economics play a factor? Sure, but the other commenter said "many" not all or even the majority, and there's little evidence to the contrary showing that these men are actually interested in patriotism and godliness and not the other aspects of these outlets. They don't want to give up their vices, they just like that some churches say they should own women. They don't want to protect their country and its values, they want to commit acts of violence. Maybe they feel this way because of the current economic and social climate, but acting as though they don't feel this way is naive.

[–] WeekendClock@lemmy.world 1 points 19 minutes ago

Because the military provides training, housing, healthcare, and education.

Basically a guaranteed ticket to a middle class career.

[–] Zero22xx@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 day ago

Of course they are. They were already halfway there by spending their free time listening to assholes talk and preach on podcasts. And I'm sure it goes nicely with all of the bigoted, misogynistic content that they consume.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Authoritarianism and religion go hand in hand. Both are rising together in the form of Christian nationalism.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, you can't say that a "religious resurgence" is happening by only counting one religion. Are there more Buddhists in the West? More Muslims? More Hindus? More Pastafarians?

Because I think Axios is missing, intentionally or not, the bigger reason: the religious right tells men they should be in control. Young men who feel like they aren't are receptive to that messaging.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 20 points 1 day ago

I would feel so much better about this if they'd had fully funded comprehensive education that required mythology, world and comparitive religion, philosophy, critical reading/thinking and logic classes.

[–] NotAGamer@lemmy.org 12 points 1 day ago

The delusions persist.

[–] OlPatchy2Eyes@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

The only notable statistic is that Gen Z are more religious than millenials, which isn't a huge deal. We'll see if the trend continues.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 3 points 1 day ago

That’s not a resurgence

[–] toomanypancakes@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

There really isn't any hope for the future, is there