this post was submitted on 08 May 2026
424 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

84569 readers
3844 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

BBC News - Woman covertly filmed for 'humiliating' social media content - BBC News https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/videos/cdxpqg22q34o

Video version of the original story. He comes across as a creep.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 46 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I got a tour of a military base with a guy who was wearing smart glasses and I couldn't fucking believe that someone didn't grab them off his face and break them in half. I was being VERY careful to ask if I was permitted to take pictures in some places (in at least one of which where the answer was No), and this dude was cruising around like Boris Badunov trying to gather secrets.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Might be a good time to tell someone.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I DID tell the guide what he was wearing because I didn't want us to end up in a military detention cell but the guide was like "Eh, it's fine," so I guess it was, but boy it didn't feel like it should have been!

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 11 points 3 days ago

it was fine because guide probably didnt understand the concept of glasses being able to record stuff, otherwise it would have been fine for you to take pictures too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] neineon77@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

another reason to continue masking in public tbh

probably going to start purposefully looking away from people if they try to talk to me with those on and if they push it I'll ask them to take them off and if they refuse to disengage completely

I know none of this is foolproof but it at least is social pressure and signalling to anyone around that I'm trying to avoid them if it escalates

[–] insaneinthemembrane@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It might work if you're a man but if you're a woman, it doesn't matter what you do, if a man wants to film you, follow you, harass you, he will do it. And now he's filming it too and posting it online for profit.

[–] neineon77@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yeah it probably won't stop them I am a woman it's mostly to publicly shame them bc maybe they'll think twice if they're not willing to escalate in public

Yeah it's probably no harm at least, worth a try.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

If they go black mirror, black mirror them back: block them. Physically they talk, you don’t respond. They don’t exist anymore.

Literally black mirror

[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 108 points 4 days ago (2 children)

precisely why I won't talk to someone wearing a camera, or pointing a camera at me.. I'll stand there in silence the entire time, or just walk away.

put the camera down, talk or buh bye..

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

The point is that she didn't even know she was being recorded. That's why this story is all about the smart glasses being used to covertly record people.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 37 points 4 days ago (1 children)

“But I want to document what you say!”

🤐🖕

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 33 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Only time it's acceptable is in front of a cop since they can't be trusted to operate the cameras they should be wearing themselves

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UniversalRecord@discuss.online 23 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Smart glasses are probably where the privacy debate around AI becomes truly mainstream. Phones are visible, wearable AI cameras are much harder for people to recognize in real time. It feels like society is heading toward a major legal and ethical adjustment period.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 5 points 3 days ago (8 children)

What were the victims doing that would incriminate them? I am not saying that it isn't enough to just not want to be filmed, but most people don't seem to care about privacy so I am wondering if they had some leverage.

probably being a woman while naked

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They don’t have to be doing something.

You just capture their likeness and Ai prompts do the rest.

[–] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Btw I have video of you engaged in passionate sexual congress with a platypus. Send me bitcoin or your mother sees it!

[–] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago

How did you know about my platypus kink? Please send it to me.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is not about smart glasses.

holding a glass slab in front of someone’s face is a lot more likely to be clocked.

So pervert blackmailers switch to button cameras. They are cheaper and even less obvious than thick black ray bans.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (7 children)

So pervert blackmailers switch to button cameras. T

It is entirely about smart glasses. button cameras have been around for AGES. But they have shit lenses and crap sensors; these fucking chodes want to up the production value on the nonconsensual porn they already shoot with their phones - on the stairs up skirts, down the blouses of women, etc.,

they want a head cam with better resolution and head tracking.

keep advocating for the perverts

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›