this post was submitted on 25 May 2026
1088 points (97.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

32283 readers
1780 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 161 points 1 month ago (2 children)

At least some times Rohan gets it right, and they get it more right over time.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 77 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Besides do you have any idea how many Rohan(s) we can afford at $150,000/month?

🔄

[–] _lilith@lemmy.world 48 points 1 month ago (4 children)
[–] xtr0n@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Total cost of employment is something like 140-160% of salary for a software dev. So my super handwavy half pulled out of my ass math puts it closer to 20 jr. engineers.

[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In France it's more like 200%. minimum. Which is why our salaries are so shit when compared with US ones.

But the new trend is hiring interns which are much cheaper, work twice as hard, and come with tax deductions.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

US salaries in general are inflated and not entirely indicative of actual spending power. They have a lot more ancillary costs like healthcare and other insurances, not to mention a significant lack of public transport means most people also need to pay for a car and gas and whatnot.

Add to that the fact that they get fuck all for vacation time meaning if they want time off, it costs their salary for the missed days. I think when you weigh it all out, it balances pretty evenly, if not somewhat in France's favour.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

I meeeean yeah, but also there are just some people who don't work out

I do prefer that over bots on everything tho. It's getting rather exhausting

[–] ozoned@piefed.social 107 points 1 month ago (12 children)

Literally was in a presentation at work the other day where they said someone used 2 million tokens and the next person used 1 million and they were so excited by it.

I didn't get it. I asked went 2 million was better than 1 million. The VP basically said it's not, just costs us more money.

So why the hell is the presentation acting like it's a fucking victory?

[–] rainwall@piefed.social 63 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Because they believe that AI will replace payroll, which is generally a businesses highest expense. The more AI usage, the more likely they can eliminate jobs and give themselves bonuses.

They are excited the way a farmer is excited when his pigs are gorging themselves on grain and getting really, really fat. The farmer is glad to pay for grain because its much cheaper than the money he makes from selling them for meat.

They are giddy because its almost time for payday.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 month ago (33 children)

I wonder at what point government will tax AI use by companies similarly to payroll taxes and incomes taxes.

If they pay an AI company $150,000 a month to replace $50,000 in salaries, the government then loses all that income tax from the previous employees as well as the payroll tax on $600k a year.

load more comments (33 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 month ago (8 children)

payroll, which is generally a businesses highest expense

This is something that changed in the industry; it was a investment back then.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 19 points 1 month ago

Because AI use is up! The FUTURE!

[–] shuffle3765@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Because it's a proxy metric for adoption. Currently you generally want your engineers to be using it as much as you can afford to so that they all learn and improve and adapt existing processes etc

[–] deeves@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also, I've been noticing more and more APIs are adopting a policy where they get rid of any unused credits that you've paid for at the end of the month, creating a 'use it or lose it' FOMO mentality.

All very normal and sane.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] VinegarChunks@lemmus.org 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Engineers under such incentives should ask AI how to most easily and speedily consume as many credits as possible, I bet it knows a great way

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Which is a stupid mindset.

"Go forth and burn tokens and your performance will be measured on that"

Looks like I'm going to make a for to ask for a for every word in /usr/share/dict/words. Look at all the tokens I burned.

It doesn't reflect upon business value, performance, or education.

It's even worse than the disastrous lines of code metric.

Their problem is they have no idea what to expect, so to signal affinity to hype, they just measure tokens.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] zewm@lemmy.world 81 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Is the face AI morphed or something? It looks uncanny valley weird.

[–] titty_wizard@lemmy.world 58 points 1 month ago

Jim halpert looksmaxxing in 2026

Dasgustin

[–] bert_macklin_fbi@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago

I don't think it registered until I read your comment. Maybe compression artifacts or something? Either way, I don't like it.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 month ago (5 children)
[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

I expected the Mr. Bean Photoshop version 😂

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] laz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Dude my nephew was telling me this an AI company galytix is literally running on Indian grads and claiming to be ai what a scam

[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 74 points 1 month ago

AI: Actually Indians

[–] VinegarChunks@lemmus.org 21 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I really wonder to what degree “Self Driving Vehicles” are being completely or partially supervised and controlled by an overseas desk worker.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 40 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don't understand the AI remake of Jim's face.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Maultasche@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

And Rohan will answer!

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 25 points 1 month ago

We should unionize and eat the useless managers.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Rohan should demand at least double that to return

[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 20 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I'm unclear what Rohan is in reference to. Can I get an explainer on that element?

[–] zewm@lemmy.world 50 points 1 month ago

Rohan is the junior data scientist they rehired cause it’s cheaper than AI.

[–] Stanley_Pain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Arise, arise, riders of Rohan! Fell deeds awake, fire and slaughter! Spear shall be shaken, shield be splintered! A sword-day, a red day, ere the sun rises! Ride now, ride now, ride to Gondor! Ride for ruin, and the world’s ending! DEATH!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] esc@piefed.social 30 points 1 month ago

Well, you know, horses, grasslands, Wormtongue - Rohan!

[–] hypnicjerk@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

rohan is a common indian name

[–] Thorry@feddit.org 8 points 1 month ago

See also Mohinder, Rashid and Vishal.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Is this AI jim?

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 month ago

They’re all moving to tokens based billing to stop the bleeding. The markets aren’t as willing to let them burn infinite cash on operating expenses anymore. A lot of the private investors see the writing on the walls, that these AI companies are not worth anywhere near the valuations, and propping them up to ensure further datacenter build out to keep Nvidia shares high is costing more than it’s worth.

A lot of the model providers are lining up for ipos to cash out their initial investors and dump the responsibility of the mess on the public markets. They have to jack their prices to pretty up their books if they want to cash out with an IPO though. The unlimited access for a flat monthly cost shtick was obviously never a viable business model. They’ve all been spending massively more on inference than they’ve been taking in subscriptions, and even with the changes to token based billing, they still will be.

Anthropic is claiming that they will have their first “profitable” month soon, but that’s actually just a magic trick of book keeping. They’re deferring some cost of compute for a few months, and accepting a bunch of pre payments from customersr. Basically pretending to have high revenue and lower cost by shifting when the payments are made. And then on top of that they’re jacking up prices and thus decreasing their demand with the shift to tokens.

Everyone is running around rearranging deck chairs on the datacenter titanic hoping they can keep their feet dry a little longer.

Tokenmaxxing goes brrr

[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Unions probably would have gone a long way during all this.

[–] raman_klogius@ani.social 8 points 1 month ago

Palantir calls for aid! Would Rohan answer?

load more comments
view more: next ›