this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
141 points (92.7% liked)

Technology

85136 readers
4073 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 minutes ago* (last edited 3 minutes ago)

Ok brb making a game about being a self righteous asshole boomer who is always correct and its actually everyone else's fault that he has no friends and his wife and kids dont speak with him.

Call it Boomer Shooter, but its not an FPS, its actually primarily a series of small adventure/puzzle levels with complex branching dialogue options.

You get points for shooting down ideas you either didn't think of first or don't like because they might imply that you aren't perfect.

The rules are made up and the points don't matter beyond a high score at the end of the bad ending.

The good ending happens when you don't get that many points, despite the game constantly handholding you and telling you thats what you should focus on.

There, enjoy your retirement.

EDIT:

The DLC will add the ability to play as a privileged white woman who gets points for morally policing everyone around her but herself, spreading misinformation, and guilt tripping people who trust her.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 minutes ago

What about indie games? Lots of good games, also for gray people.

[–] OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 hour ago

It's not a good long term market because retirees will be gone in 20-30 years and millennials+ will never be able to retire.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

I still care about video games very much but the industry suffers from growing bad incentives. Stop Killing Games is merely the start for me - I want games to catch up with other software and start respecting user's software freedoms.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 13 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I thought that when you turn 40 they just give you a copy of Tetris The Grand Master and that's all you get to play for the rest of your life?

[–] DeuxChevaux@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

I still like my 3D Tetris, though. I was just never able to beat my record that i scored in 1995.

[–] GunValkyrie@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Tetris effect and lumines rise are the replacements.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 23 points 4 hours ago

what the fuck? isn’t the dark souls for retired people… just dark souls?

[–] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I got into fortnite with friends over the winter, as I was turning 40. I get my share of zb dubs youngins

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 70 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I think it's pretty telling that so many of the people they talk to and a lot of the focus of the article isn't really about older gamers, it's about their money.

The opportunity is substantial. The 40+ segment in the US is on track to grow from $19 billion in 2022 to $43 billion by 2030, a 132% expansion at a moment when the rest of the industry is shrinking. These are players with the most disposable income, the longest gaming literacy, and the highest brand loyalty.

I'm in that "40+ segment" and I suspect part of the "problem" these companies face is that older gamers have seen the enshitification of so many of the brands we love. Our tolerance for bullshit is basically gone at this point. Micro transactions, season passes, fucking ads in games, all of that bullshit is a quick way to not get our money.

I also suspect "brand loyalty" is basically gone for the same reason. As a kid, I looked for the Electronic Arts logo. If I saw this logo on a game package, I knew I was looking at a good game. I haven't bought an EA game in years. I don't expect to buy an EA game any time soon and I basically ignore everything they do. Sure, if a trailer for Starflight 3 dropped, I'd sit up and take notice. I'd also expect it to be an enshitified mess wearing the skin of a beloved series to sucker me in, before pouncing on my wallet.

So ya, maybe just make good games and older gamers will inevitably buy them. I mean, Larian can pretty much say, "hi we're making..." and I'll have my wallet out and be pulling bills before they get any further. And maybe that's your "brand loyalty". Game companies who make good games and aren't private equity firms wearing the dead skin suits of brands we used to love.

[–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

This sums up my thoughts on it, too.

Before reading it, I was ready to come back here expecting to say I'm glad someone's thinking about older gamers and joke that I feel attacked (being grey and not feeling my age), but then I saw it went down the "but their juicy wallets" angle and... I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.

They're not even couching it in more palatable terms. So now I expect it will be just a patronising nostalgia IP reboot fest designed to extract as much cash as possible. And almost certainly subscription-based, because what company doesn't these days.

Good luck with that: older people may have more disposable income, but they also have years of experience with marketing and FOMO tricks, along with the exploitation and butchering of franchises they once loved for a quick buck.

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

So now I expect it will be just a patronising nostalgia IP reboot fest designed to extract as much cash as possible.

Ya, this is one of the big turn-offs for me. For example, I really liked Prince of Persia: Sands of Time back in the day. I've got exactly zero interest in the remake. Ubisoft's logo now looking like a neat pile of dogshit, viewed from above, is pretty apt.

[–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Prince of Persia is a great example! Did Lemmings ever get a reboot? 😄

I kind of want to see what modern game developers can do with old C64 games like Parallax or Head Over Heels, or Amiga ones like Cannon Fodder or Sensible Soccer, but time has taught me 2 things:

  1. Be very careful what you wish for. You may get it in the worst way possible.
  2. Nostalgia is sometimes best left in the past.

I do like that GOG, etc, do their game preservation thing. Seeing games like Hexen, Rise of the Triad and Wing Commander running on modern CPUs is kinda fun, but often confirms point 2 above.

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I am not quite in that demographic but getting pretty close. I've bought maybe a game a year for a very long time now. Most non-indie stuff is complete and utter trash. If I see a AAA publisher logo, I take it as a sign that it's not worth my time or money.

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Most non-indie stuff is complete and utter trash.

Ya, it's telling that some of my favorite games these days all started as indie games. I do worry about them as they get in bed with larger producers, but I also understand the draw. E.g. I still love Valheim, but they were Embracer'd by private equity. And I'm waiting for that relationship to push them to shit all over their players. Though I understand that publisher backing lets them focus more on development and less on the marketing and distribution of the game.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 36 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

My dad is in his 70s and he spends most of his time playing open world shooters/rpgs. He just finished borderlands whatever is new and started his 5th or so witcher 3 run. He also plays free to play puzzle games on mobile (to my disappointment)

My point being that I think "games for the retired people" is just games....

[–] gruvn@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 hours ago

I'm old and I agree. I play Elden Ring, Dark Souls, and stuff like Overwatch. I do not want games aimed at old people - just good games. No one wants "Shuffleboard: The Game" or "Pickleball: The Game". And if they do want those things, they probably already exist.

[–] HailSeitan@lemmy.world 61 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

There are literally 9000 hidden object games on Steam

[–] Thaurin@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Why would older people prefer hidden object games?

[–] KingKong33@lemmy.ml 1 points 34 minutes ago

Because they're always forgetting where they left shit, its good practice for them.

[–] PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

My guess is that they're not twitchy and they keep your mind active.

[–] Thaurin@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

There are so many non-twitchy games, though, and hidden object games are not what they grew up with.

And maybe they like twitchy games. Platformers were among the first games older people played in their youth.

[–] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 15 points 7 hours ago

Rather retire and play starcraft

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 42 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

What would a game for a retired person look like? Stuff that isn't twitchy is all over the place: puzzlers, sims, casual experiences, and visual novels exist by the truck load. The main character doesn't need to be 80 for it to be a game for the older generation.

[–] kubok@fedia.io 1 points 25 minutes ago

I am almost 50, so not quite retired yet. I like slow casual games. Puzzle games, survival games and CRPGs scratch my gaming itch.

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 16 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Turn based strategy. Anything that doesn't require reaction time and too much fine motor control.

Sid Meier's Civilizations series is a great example.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

Boomer and Gen X retired people didn't typically grow up with computers. So, I think part of the challenge is a way to play games that's easy. Probably games on mobile phones are a good approach because the process of finding, installing and launching those games is easy if you're not a "computer person". OTOH, old people's eyes aren't great, and they don't tend to have a lot of dexterity, so while a phone UI might be good, the actual device is maybe too small and fiddly. Games on tablets is probably a much better option.

Steam deck might be ideal, but only if you can bump up the UI font size so that it's more readable if you're older. That would give them access to hundreds of thousands of games. But, the problem is most are probably designed for a PC screen, so they'll have tiny UI elements.

In terms of the games themselves, probably something turn-based would be ideal. I happen to like those kinds of games anyhow. But, as I get older and my reaction speed gets worse, I think I'll play fewer and fewer games that require fast reactions and good aim.

Another consideration would maybe be something social. A lot of older people are still in relationships, and want to be able to do something together. That also means either multiple steam decks so each person can have their own, or maybe couch co-op games.

So, I think it's:

  • Turn based strategy, or any other turn-based game -- visual novels might work, trivia quizzes, detective games, just so long as it isn't reaction speed based
  • A system that's easy to find, install, and launch games. Even steam for PC is probably intimidating for people who haven't been on PCs for most of their lives.
  • Big fonts for people with fading vision.
  • Easy controls.
  • Maybe couch co-op for couples to play together

Based on that, I can see why Nintendo Wii games were really popular. The system is very easy to use. It runs on the TV so fonts can be nice and huge. A lot of it is couch co-op so couples can play together. They also have a lot of games meant for kids, but those games are also easy for older people to understand and enjoy. They also didn't have sexual / violent themes that old people are sometimes more sensitive about than your typical gamer.

It also shows why Nintendo's follow up consoles didn't work as well. The Wii U had a gamepad. That's more intimidating, and not as easy to use if you have poor vision. Then came the Switch, which was even worse if you have poor vision. Plus the detachable controllers are ideal for kids, but old people now have to fiddle with little almost hidden buttons to detach them. Not good.

[–] sbbq@lemmy.zip 13 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

My mother used to complain that they didn't make movies for old people. She literally did just want movies with old actors. What, are we gonna watch gamgam go to 6 doctors appointments?

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (4 children)

they do make those movies. they don't make any money, because old people don't want to see them either and don't want to look at old people.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 hours ago

Expendables?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zarxrax@lemmy.world 27 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

WTF are games for retired people?

[–] Weingeist@feddit.org 37 points 7 hours ago

Tony Hawk's Pro Walker 2000

[–] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 21 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Something the boomers took away from us when they retired

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

They took it away long before that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hominine@lemmy.world 18 points 7 hours ago

"Analysts" are a large part of why I abandoned "AAA" games over the decades. Keep them.

[–] Enkrod@feddit.org 10 points 7 hours ago

As soon as I retire, every single one of the multiple hundred games in my steam library will be a game for at least one retired person... except the ones I don't like and don't play anymore, like PAYDAY 2.

[–] Palerider@feddit.uk 4 points 5 hours ago

I'm 54 in a couple of months... I'm currently playing BF6 to death. Before that it was Apex. I've been playing games since the 8-bit days and just never stopped.

[–] rozodru@piefed.world 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

sure there are games for retired people. EVE Online. pretty much everyone who plays that are either middle aged or retired.

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, this seems more like marketers worrying about leaving money behind.

Any game where I can stop and think for a moment will work perfectly fine when I'm retired, from factorio to final fantasy.

[–] tunetardis@piefed.ca 4 points 6 hours ago

My band plays charity gigs at nursing homes, and they seem to love the Wii! They'll have like Wii Sports nights and stuff.

I'm getting on in years a bit myself. I have no problem with strategy/sim type games, but those where you can't afford to even blink are beginning to test my stamina. Though my wife recently got me into Diablo IV, and I seem to be doing better with that. Maybe because it doesn't use a 1st person perspective?

[–] adarza@piefed.ca 4 points 6 hours ago

it's a dead market. once the current crop of retirees die off, there won't be anymore because the rest of us will have to work til we die.

[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

While they're not to my liking and have exploitative microtransactions, the market is highly served by games like Candy Crush and Wordscapes.