this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2026
108 points (96.6% liked)

Linux

65927 readers
626 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 hours ago

I think Ubuntu is the Windows 11 of Linux distros.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 hours ago

I'll just leave this here... https://debian.org/

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Well fuck you too Canonical.

[–] Draegur@lemmy.zip 19 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Well they can listen to my voice when I say this:

no thanks

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

"Our new AI listens to you and will do whatever you tell it to do."

"Tell it to fuck off."

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 4 points 15 hours ago

Based on what I read/saw and got out of it, I am real disappointed it looks like it's gonna be using genAI instead of another form of AI we've been using for transcription. Otherwise, sounds like trying to be a modern genAI version of that speech to text software I'd see ads for on TV. Possibly good for accessibility, but I'll wait and see after it comes out.

At least they claim the whole thing to be done offline after model installation and it's allegedly sandboxed with the audio data being stored in a memory buffer that allegedly will be erased after the session. So I'll have to wait and see how this all plays out before making more judgments on it.

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago

Thanks Canonical.....I'll just throw it in the pile with all the other "wonderful" things you've made. It can go on the shelf next to Mir.

[–] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 3 points 18 hours ago

God fuck them. They are hunting for hype and not making linux better for the masses

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 63 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Being real, this is why I fucking hate the bullshit, corporate greed hype of LLMs and generative software. All the "bubble" shit? It tars all versions of the technology with the same brush.

This? This is exactly what it should be used for. And, ffs, earlier speech to text was really the same fucking thing in essence. Software that took input in the form of voice, compared it to a set of data, and made a best guess at what you meant. Yeah, the details are different, but it's the same concept.

This? This is fucking awesome. Locally run, and doing a job that's vital in accessibility, with the side benefit of being useful to others. Assuming canonical is being honest anyway.

But this kind of thing should be the way things are done.

[–] Luisp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That's why we should not call everything AI

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Even if we called them LLMs, which we should, people will keep having these negative connotations to the technology because of overmarketing. This feature is still using LLMs, and that's not supposed to be a bad thing.

Stop blaming the technology, and blame the corpos pushing it to the moon. This is "BitTorrent is only used for piracy" bullshit all over again.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

But it is AI, so it should be called that. People should adjust their simplistic notions about the term instead

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Nah, it isn't. Intelligence implies independence. What it is is a fancy algorithm with a big data set.

It doesn't have to be general ai to be called ai, but so far none of the models I'm aware of have reached a standard to be called intelligence in the colloquial sense for sure

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 15 hours ago

The term used in academic literature and the field itself for that kind of technology is and has been AI for at least ten years. Intelligence doesn't imply independence anyways? And besides, even if it did, thats why an entire 50% of the term consists of the modifier "artificial". So like, you're right that it isn't intelligence in the colloquial sense. It's artificial intelligence in the technical and standardized sense, though. The use of term is pretty much totally undebatable. Just because people don't like the term now doesn't change that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 21 points 1 day ago

shrug-outta-hecks maybe it will lead to better accessibility tooling. This is obviously rather silly as a default mode of operations, especially if you imagine people in a crowded office all yelling at their computers.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 86 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Offline-only speech-to-text, integrated with the desktop for push-to-talk voice typing? That's the kind of AI that I'd like to see. Actually add features that can help people without harming their rights. I'm still moving new machines to Debian but this is nice.

[–] MangoPenguin@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Also how is speech to text AI? It has existed for decades, obviously a lot better now but I don't think I'd consider it "AI"

[–] pooterbroo@programming.dev 2 points 4 hours ago

And 'AI' has existed since the 1950s.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There's been ML and non-ML ways of doing STT over the years. as far as I recall. The current best implementations are ML-based. In coloquial terms ML algorithms are AI. We used to call them AI in the 2010s, before AI was (un)cool.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 day ago

The framework split things into two groups, implicit AI that quietly improves what you already use and explicit AI that are features you'd actually summon on purpose.

The very first paragraph already upsets me. Have in mind, I would criticize this on every other operating system too. I believe no one should use Ai tools that act autonomously in the background, to improve or change what you already use. It should always be a "summon on purpose".

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 1 points 17 hours ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHepKd38pr0

One more step towards the discovery of what androids dream about.

[–] Somecall_metim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Canonical can take its AI and walk into the sea

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (28 children)

You don't like accessibility?

load more comments (28 replies)
[–] aim_at_me@lemmy.nz 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Bit of a click baity title lol. If there’s one good use of AI, its probably accessibility.

[–] halm@leminal.space 6 points 1 day ago

Yeah, "Ubuntu wants you to use their new feature" is... unsurprising. Explaining the benefits and purpose of that feature? Now you're talking.

[–] Mordikan@kbin.earth 33 points 1 day ago

Implicit optional features to use local LLMs for STT is something that I think most reasonable people could get behind. Too many accessibility tools for the disabled sit behind paywalls and subscription models.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 11 points 1 day ago

My grandma used to hate tech until she learned to use the voice assistance on her mobile phone. It unlocked the phone for her because she doesnt have the dexterity to type. I hope one day this tool could get to that same point.

load more comments
view more: next ›