Are you suggesting we should feel bad about something here?
BoulevardBlvd
joined 1 month ago
I mean... Russia would own Ukraine by year three of this war and wouldn't be using WW2 munitions if they were prepared and strong. There's something to be said about the Russian military preparedness
If you were in Thailand or China and you posted what you did, you're even more of a moron than I thought.
I reject your false framing. You're conflating society and the government in your question.
To answer the question I'm pretending you meant to ask: No, The government should not have the requisite monopoly of violence necessary to enforce speech laws. It is a human right. Any sanction should be exclusively received from society.
Except you can and projecting your beliefs onto others is the literal definition of society. You can't not project your beliefs onto others
We are not bystanders. All societies are negotiated both within them between members and between members and observers outside. The idea that anyone should forgo their opinion on another culture is naive and asinine. You're asking for all social exchange to stop in order to preserve an arbitrary set of rules in amber. The system you want to uphold as precious is both not real, and not valuable enough to justify the cost
Oh also, free speech is an inalienable right. In fact I'd go so far as to say learning it's inalienable is how you learned the word inalienable. Free speech is a human right. Anyone anywhere who is limiting it is commiting a crime against humanity. The opinion of the people in charge doesn't change that. That's literally how inalienable rights work. So, no fucking clue what you were on about there
Also also, if you were Canadian, what trouble could you possibly get in being critical of Thailand? You're either an insane coward or a liar for that one
Not being invested enough to engage isn't pathetic, it's the normal response. It's not pathetic to not be chronically online my dude
I don't doubt op has a stalker, but not commenting everywhere isn't what makes them pathetic. It's all the times when the stalker is engaging that are pathetic, not the times when they aren't
Yah, nope. Still completely fucking lost. You suck at writing my dude. Maybe take a class? Idk, but your teachers failed you hard. I said we because I'm not op supergenius.
Yup. That one's on me. I should have been more specific. I asked for an example of Nazis with power in Ukraine and you gave it to me.
Let me try again, what Nazis, specifically named, are in power today? Because what you linked mentioned one politician who is still active today who is vaguely linked to the OUN and it didn't even tell me what that link was. Similarly "Rising antisemitism" and "rising nationalism" are meaningless in this day and age. I need you to show me what you mean when you say those things. I asked for evidence, not more claims.
That depends. Name another Nazi brigade. I've literally only ever heard Azov when people call Ukrainians Nazis. Where are the rest? What are there names? One brigade does not a political problem make. So where are the rest of the Nazis? What is their influence in government? What laws are they pushing? What do they control? Where are the Nazis?
No. Propagandist is.
No one knowing what you're saying is a problem, but that's a you problem. Everyone who reads what you wrote is confused because what you're saying sounds like the ravings of a lunatic. No one knows what you're talking about. We've never heard of these events you're alluding to. So either show proof of them or we're going to write you off as another propaganda shill
But you knew all of this because it's 2025 and no one on lemmy doesn't understand how the Internet works. Which means you're lying for a purpose. You're a propagandist.
Most of the time it's accompanied by "sins of the father" rhetoric where nothing changes but we'll see I guess
They're admitting that now dead people did bad things a long time ago. Not exactly impressive
Weird. You called me evil when I suggested it as the correct way to pay creatives and everyone else. Maybe your problem with my argument is your own reading comprehension.