FiskFisk33

joined 3 years ago
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

Is this downvoted because people doesnt agree with the content, or because they don't trust the source?

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 14 points 5 months ago

a real life example? you mean like a photo of a person next to a router?

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago

depends a lot, but yes some lights are like that.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 7 points 5 months ago

"Your password doesnt meet the required 64 bits of entropy"

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 4 points 5 months ago

they never specified it to be scientific or rigorous.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This could have been amazing if integrated into a district heating network.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

♫ Voulez-Vous Coucher Avec Moi Ce Soir ♫

Yes, I can imagine. It's done literally all the time, in every genre.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago

alternate caption:
"has feet"

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 4 points 5 months ago (4 children)

this sends a clear message though. No the old "just hook them, then we have guaranteed income forever" isn't actually working. That's great.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 7 points 5 months ago

Thats why I'm saying borders on. I know it's not technically plagiarizing, but they really did just lift the video into text form and call it their own article.

Yes they credit her, but what did they actually add themselves?

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 6 points 5 months ago (4 children)

The article is essentially a text version of that video.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 35 points 5 months ago (9 children)

Huh, this borders on plagiarism.

This article is essentially a transcription of this video https://youtu.be/WnzR5aOElvw

view more: ‹ prev next ›