Correct, but this is about collecting it without any crime.
Great argument. You must have been on the debate team.
They already have - having Nukes.
You guys really have to find a new "insult". Bootlicker means nothing anymore since you clowns use it all the time, 90% of which it isn't even appropriate.
What fallacy did I present?
(There is no indication that she used the password on government accounts.)
Why do we care then?
MOST PEOPLE re-use passwords for everything. Most people use the most-used passwords in every data breach as their passwords. Stuff like this shouldn't surprise anyone. Most members of government likely don't even know what 2FA is, and likely use Password123 as their password. They're not known for being tech wiz's.
Absolutely. I'm not the one saying that the law isn't always right - I'm saying the law is what determines what is legal/illegal.
Say it with me: randomly generated username.
Also someone being for freedom doesn't mean they don't believe in the rule of law.
Nope. Compliance check lists matter when you are audited by external companies for things like PCI. It's also not a lot of effort, nor is it ineffective, nor is making sure software is up to date ignored.
If a company on enterprise plans has non-IT technical people doing their technical policies then nothing will save them.
Unless your retirement fund was actively selling shares when the prices went down, which would have been a stupid thing to do, when the market rebounded the retirement funds value rebounded.
It’s not a loophole though.