FreedomAdvocate

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] FreedomAdvocate -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And why would that shitty practice be relevant in this discussion? Because they were talking about desktop gpus.

Take your own advice. You’re bringing up downvotes to try and support your mistake - that’s an obviously bad faith argument. The irony of what you’re saying is astounding.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They specifically pointed out that Nvidia GPUs have less than 16GB of RAM on their lower and mid end cards. They’re talking about desktop cards, clearly, because this is only a complaint about desktop cards as I just pointed out. Is 188GB less than 16GB? No.

You jumped into the middle of someone else’s conversation and misunderstood what was being discussed. Take the L and move along.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Nvidia AI gpu’s don’t have <16GB of RAM. They have 48+. Some have over 180GB. They were talking about desktop GPUs, the RTX series. It makes no sense to congratulate Chinese GPU makers for having 16GB of RAM and being angry at Nvidia for having 188GB - not a typo, they have one hundred and eighty-eight GB of RAM - like their H100 NVL.

The <16GB complaint is a common and long standing complaint about their desktop GPUs.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Sure, but when you jump in the middle of another 2 people’s conversation to say you disagree, it’s not up to the other people to automatically know that you’re actually disagreeing with something different to what they’re discussing lol

[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Where did I disagree with their ruling?

You’re the one trolling here bud.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Where did I say I didn’t like that ruling?

[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 1 year ago

The claim was that FSD did this, but no evidence was provided to say it did.

My claim is that there’s no evidence to show FSD was enabled.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -3 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Cool, you’re not the original person I replied to.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

That’s not evidence lol. The claim is that FSD did this, but no evidence was provided to show that it was.

The owner of this Tesla could have also posted the internal cabin camera footage. Wonder why they didn’t?….

[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 1 year ago (10 children)

They definitely are, unless you think that they’re saying that nvidias big boy AI gpus come with less than 16GB of RAM.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

They can’t stop and ask for assistance at 100km/h on a highway.

I hope Tesla/Musk address this accident and get the telemetry from the car, cause there’s no evidence that FSD was even on.

view more: ‹ prev next ›