It is almost like the value many ( not all ) christians see in christianity isn't the ethics but instead the ease at which they can mark the trait of non-christian and classify it as unclean , evil, and less than. Not that the Bible is the 'best' ethical document to begin with but my hot take is that most people look for systems that let them feel better about themselves for the least amount of effort.
ProfessorYakkington
joined 6 years ago
I certainly agree that more options will help - but, I would love to see a more federate / user powered, owned option take YouTube's place not just Youtube #2. it feels like a centralized option will just corrupt over time no matter the intentions and we will just be repeating the same mistakes but perhaps the economics of Video hosting / streaming at scale require something like this .. I am not sure how the economics of something like peer tube scale but I would love to see us all learn from our mistake and not just make it again. But ... maybe I am just idealistic and not grounded in reality.
Yeah , I love a good ad blocker / sponsor block / privacy frontend but they all feel like duck tape on a sinking boat. At some point we have to move away from these centralized platforms but the enshitification hasn't outweighed the lion's share of content / creators on these platforms to a tipping point for the majority. Ad blocks let you mitigate the enshitification so you can stay on these platforms longer - in many cases this is required so not knocking it, I do it as well. My hope is that as these companies continue to go after ad blocks users will finally jump ship in mass as they are forced to confront the lovecraftian nightmare that is any of these platforms without an ad block.
Glad to hear it. But fines like this are just a cost of business for them and for every big company. A fine only hurts if it turns the profit negative. It has to bite enough that breaking the law costs more than not getting caught. Or someone goes to jail. They made more than $942 million by gambling with kids' safety. The leaders likely read the ruling and did the math and would make the same decisions again and just try harder to get away with it. Getting caught harming children ( not just children ) at scale should result in a company no longer existing. It doesn't.
yeah , I don't think things look great across the board but I really struggle to see any light for the younger generations that are either in the education system or just coming out of it. With no real incentive to educate out side of a desire to just be educated I could see a strong dystopian future where those generations have less and less skills to critically judge information ... but also clearly the older generations can't critically judge information as well - which is how we got here. But , perhaps things will look dystopian enought that it will trigger change.
My one hope with all this nonsense is that it will drive people away from centeralized products and toward more open , democratized options ( and that those options will remain excluded from these laws. )... but the world doesn't normally go the way that I want.
Cool!! i was literally just thinking about this as part of my effort to be more analogue. I will follow this hungrily.
Maybe these type of things will finally push people away from these platforms and toward more open / non-centeralized platforms.
Here is a fun game to try with your friends... flip the words of Company does X to random person does X ... then see what punishments feel appropriate. Company X destroys the 10% of the amazon becomes Todd from work destroys.. or Bob framed another person for sex crimes. Crazy how privileged companies are vs individuals.