Won't this push it past the 100 day extension period congress did authorize in the original bill that was signed into law? Even if Trump said he won't enforce the fine for Google, Apple, and Oracle for distributing the app, Democrats should make it clear they will go after those companies once Trump no longer controls the DoJ.
bamboo
joined 2 years ago
Not sure how true it was, but there was a YouTuber claiming that their videos were getting entirely demonetized because too many of their viewers had Ad blockers enabled. So even though 75% of people were seeing ads on the video, Google was keeping that ad revenue, withholding it all from the creator because 25% weren't getting ads. The claim the youtuber made is that this will probably predominantly impact creators with a more tech savvy / privacy aware audience, resulting in less of that niche content.
Anyway, this is anecdotal, but I wouldn't put it past Google to pass the issue to the creators for the actions of their consumers, even though it's not their fault.
I'll gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today
Wailing Wallie, amiright?
Yeah, I remember when it was $75 but didn't jump on it then. Back then I didn't think they'd ever charge for basic functionality that was offered for free for 10 years. I don't regret not getting it though, this is the kick I need over to Jellyfin.
Let's Encrypt supports DNS verification, if you have access to update the zone file. It makes automation harder, but there are scripts to do the DNS update for the verification.
Was the price the same then as it is now? $120 USD? Based on the article, the price will only raise at the end of April.
Yess finally. Switched off of Chrome after seeing uBlock Origin was going to go away, but I have a lot of PWAs which has been hacky to get working.
At least single issue voters do vote for the candidate who supports their single issue. Anyone in the Abandon Harris camp who voted for Trump because of the Biden/Harris handling over the Palestinian genocide was severely ignorant of Trump's policies. I guess this would have to include those who didn't see him as a threat for their interests and decided not to vote.
It'd be like an anti-abortion single issue voter casting a ballot for a candidate who's supporting Extreme Abortions ™.
Basically what other people in the comments are saying, but here is a video Matt Parker explaining it: https://youtu.be/j04IAbWCszg?t=461