charonn0

joined 3 years ago
[–] charonn0@startrek.website 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'd rather be guilty of that than of being the ones who rejected them.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's clearly haunted.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Noo-clee-ar... wessels

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 12 points 2 months ago

Probably not criminal trespassing, since they are the owner of the property. It may fall under tenant harassment, unauthorized entry, constructive eviction, or other laws that pertain specifically to landlord/tenant relations.

Check to see if there are any local tenant's rights or advocacy groups in your area that offer free legal consultations. They'd be able to advise you on the local tenant's rights laws and whether they apply to your situation.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Just stick your hands between your buttocks. That's nature's pocket.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 1 points 3 months ago

Multiple HTTP requests can be performed over a single connection, and not all connections are for HTTP requests in the first place. The only way to know that an HTTP request is being made (or how many) is to actually see the requests.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It would be a privacy nightmare, of course. Either we would all have to install monitoring software on our devices, or we would have to allow ISPs to break HTTPS.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 0 points 3 months ago

All flags are an expression of opinion. Even the pride flag has different versions that include or exclude different sub-cultures and allies.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website -2 points 3 months ago

This is a case where it's the government that's wearing the proverbial cross necklace, not another employee.

view more: ‹ prev next ›