this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2026
146 points (94.0% liked)

Electric Vehicles

2893 readers
323 users here now

Overview:

Electric Vehicles are a key part of our tomorrow and how we get there. If we can get all the fossil fuel vehicles off our roads, out of our seas and out of our skies, we'll have a much better environment. This community is where we discuss the various different vehicles and news stories regarding electric transportation.


Related communities:


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Preorders in 2027. No photos or real feature reveals.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

If the pickup is at a lower height, less ostentatious/dangerous grill, and shorter than 200 inches, I won't begrudge someone a pickup compared to an SUV.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

They used to make em like this. 90s/00s Ford Rangers, Mazda B-Series, Chevy S10s, Toyota Tacomas are all reasonably-sized compact pickups that can still fit 4x8 sheet goods in the bed and have plenty of hauling power for a homeowner that does frequent house projects. If they brought that form factor back but made it electric, I'd buy one in a heartbeat.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, the Maverick misses the mark by being roughly the right size, but a teeny-tiny bed for the sake of the crew cab. A car that begrudgingly has a token bed. People have gotten surprisingly good use out of the tiny bed and going to all manners of awkward tailgate-down shenigans to carry things that don't fit, but it's awkward.

The "more passenger space than a RAV4" makes it clear they are going to have an even bigger cab than a maverick, so that's a worrying sign. However, since they seem to also be obsessed with "you can fit your surfboards in the bed", then they may have at least done a mid-gate, and that could get me the sort of truck experience I'd need, with the compromise of being open to the weather to get full bed length. Might suck for trying to haul stuff into super dusty worksites where you'd probably not want to be open to the elements too long, but for me that might be an acceptable compromise (I do have to carry enough passengers to usually need the passenger space, and on the occasion I need to carry something long, I generally have a nice day of weather and don't go anywhere too filthy). Would be better than my current situation where I have to rent a trailer anytime I want to do anything mildly significant to tow with an SUV.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yeah, and the Maverick is still huge compared to the old Rangers, with half the bed. I understand that I'm probably in a very small market as just a homeowner that likes to do renno projects and furniture building, but I absolutely do not need the passenger space like someone transporting supplies and a crew to a worksite. But it feels like every new pickup coming out is marketed as a minivan with a terrible excuse for a bed attached.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 26 minutes ago

Yeah, I guess when they started mainstreaming crew cabs their market took off and was much more profitable to chase that, with concessions for traditional cabs only for overly long beds.

At least judging from the internet, don't think the market is all that tiny, people have been lamenting the loss of the old S10 and Ranger and such ever since the Colorado and new Ranger launched.

But it looks like Slate believes in that market, but everyone else seems to think that a small truck must have a crew cab. That everyone that needs a 'real bed' won't mind a full size truck.