this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
161 points (94.5% liked)

Technology

71396 readers
3700 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google says a new AI tool on its search engine will rejuvenate the internet. Others predict an apocalypse for websites. One thing is clear: the current chapter of online history is careening towards its end. Welcome to the "machine web".

The web is built on a simple bargain – websites let search engines like Google slurp up their content, free of charge, and Google Search sends people to websites in exchange, where they buy things and look at adverts. That's how most sites make money.

An estimated 68% of internet activity starts on search engines and about 90% of searches happen on Google. If the internet is a garden, Google is the Sun that lets the flowers grow.

This arrangement held strong for decades, but a seemingly minor change has some convinced that the system is crumbling. You'll soon see a new AI tool on Google Search. You may find it very useful. But if critics' predictions come true, it will also have seismic consequences for the internet. They paint a picture where quality information could grow scarcer online and large numbers of people might lose their jobs. Optimists say instead this could improve the web's business model and expand opportunities to find great content. But, for better or worse, your digital experiences may never be the same again.

On 20 May 2025, Google's chief executive Sundar Pichai walked on stage at the company's annual developer conference. It's been a year since the launch of AI Overviews, the AI-generated responses you've probably seen at the top of Google Search results. Now, Pichai said, Google is going further. "For those who want an end-to-end AI Search experience, we are introducing an all-new AI Mode," he said. "It's a total reimagining of Search."

You might be sceptical after years of AI hype, but this, for once, is the real deal.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 18 points 6 hours ago

Dead Internet theorists were right, just a half decade or so early.

[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 35 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

That fucking AI thing absolutely sucks for anything factual. I’m a journalist and noticed that it gleefully listed all sorts of factual errors in that AI summary. Stuff that you can see correctly on the original pages, but it somehow manages to misinterpret everything and shows incorrect information.

And knowing how lazy people are these days, most will happily accept Google’s incorrect information as fact. It’s making me very, very nervous for the future.

[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 12 minutes ago

Sounds like it's perfectly accomplishing Google's goal to disinform. I suspect it will get more clever at sounding correct over time too.

[–] ennuiparse@lemm.ee 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

My wife and I both googled the same question yesterday and it gave us both completely different answers.

[–] botanicangular@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Its a stochastic process

[–] phantomwise@lemmy.ml 34 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

"about to destroy the web" ???

Where have you been these last 10 years? It's been getting worse for a long time, even before AI. It's just getting worse quicker now.

[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 11 points 5 hours ago

This is fundamentally worse than a lot of what we've seen already though, is it not?

AI overviews are parasitic to traffic itself. If AI overviews are where people begin to go for information, websites get zero ad revenue, subscription revenue, or even traffic that can change their ranking in search.

Previous changes just did things like pulling a little better context previews from sites, which only somewhat decreased traffic, and adding more ads, which just made the experience of browsing worse, but this eliminates the entire business model of every website completely if Google continues pushing down this path.

It centralizes all actual traffic solely into Google, yet Google would still be relying on the sites it's eliminating the traffic of for its information. Those sites cut costs by replacing human writers with more and more AI models, search quality gets infinitely worse, sourcing from articles that themselves were sourced from nothing, then most websites which are no longer receiving enough traffic to be profitable collapse.

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 100 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Quit.... Using... Google... Search

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 61 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Just to reiterate - don’t use Google

[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

To avoid misunderstandings: FUCK GOOGLE

[–] artocode404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

For those who didn't get it... GOOGLE IS SHIT, DON'T USE!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

What’s the best alternative, in your opinion? I’ve tried Bing and DuckDuckGo, but both showed me worse results for my particular searches.

I just want classic Google Search back, before everything got turned to shit. But I fear that doesn’t really exist since there’s such an economic incentive behind how search engines rank and show results.

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I've been using a combination of brave and ddg. Work with the filtering

I was an SEO for 20+. Years. Google is dying as far as search relevancy. It's trying to transition to a new paradigm that prioritizes payment surrounding data than ads. Much more money in the data angle, and ads as we know them will be dying soon, replaced with more insipid product placements.

[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

I’ll check out Brave, it’s been mentioned a few times.

I don’t mind companies making a dime, but now it’s really devolved in bad results that are profit-driven.

[–] Kr4u7@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 8 hours ago

Searxng - any of the instances hosted in Germany Brave search - but only search

[–] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 7 hours ago

If you can afford to spend 10 bucks a month for a search engine, Kagi is pretty sleek. No ads, you can block/prioritize websites, good bangs, convinient CSS field for easy modding.

It does AI stuff too, but it's optional as the other non-standard search output fields.

[–] 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (4 children)

We have good options to replace Google Search. What good options exist to replace search on Google Maps?

Edit: Also, I think they make most of their money off of ad-sense adds embedded in apps and websites. It'll be very difficult to weed all those out. I just use uBlock on Firefox and Blockada on Android.

[–] BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago

Open Street Maps, or any fork from it. You can also purchase a modern road atlas for basically nothing. Alternatively, people do make navigation units for cars, that you can purchase. Life is completely possible, with relatively little inconvenience if you want to separate yourself from Big Tech. I write down the directions and just follow street signs. You don't want to rely on things like GPS, because it destroys your ability to commit identifying markers to memory. You can glance at the screen and glance at the road in front of you. But that stops you from being able to commit the experience from memory. Smart Tech and the offloading of our mental faculties to technology has made all of us

  1. Way too overconfident in our ability to comprehend, review and parse information.

  2. Decimated our attention spans and will most likely see a whole new type of cognitive decline.

Sorry for the tangent. But yeah, there's options there. With or without the tech.

[–] Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 hours ago

OsmAnd. There's also a new fork of Organic Maps called CoMaps after Organic had some drama. A bunch of Organic devs left and forked it into CoMaps.

[–] insomniac@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

What are good Google alternatives that don’t rely on Google or Bing?

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I mean... Organic sorta works, although apparently there's a new fork and some drama around it? If you're less hardcore DuckDuckGo uses Apple Maps instead.

I'm not sure I understand the question.

[–] 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Most of the businesses other than gas stations and restaurants are missing or have very outdated information.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 21 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

Got a machine web

It’s better than the rest

Green to Red

Machine web

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 8 points 11 hours ago

I'm gonna say it.

Of the buttrock bands that followed Nirvana's model,... Bush was the best one, for three albums anyway.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 25 points 13 hours ago

I'm betting on Google destroying Google instead.

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 3 points 9 hours ago

No, but not for want of trying.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 7 points 12 hours ago
[–] karashta@fedia.io 9 points 13 hours ago (3 children)
[–] whalebiologist@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Qwant was what let me switch off goog. I still use gmaps unfort my experiments with open source maps were failures.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

How would an ai tool thats designed as a one stop shop reinvigorate the web? Stupid idiot marketer

[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 7 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

It will keep the normies out of the good websites 👍🏽

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Subdivide6857@midwest.social 4 points 13 hours ago
load more comments
view more: next ›