this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2026
655 points (99.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

33911 readers
779 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] the16bitgamer@piefed.ca 199 points 3 months ago (8 children)

Looks for my username. Sees my 8 open repositories in there. Sees my poorly coded Uni projects are also in there.

Oh lord my code is actively helping making AI worse.

[–] iammike@programming.dev 74 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Mission failed successfully!

Glad to be part of the crew with shitty code in Github to taint them plagiarism machines!

[–] PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social 10 points 3 months ago

90% of the code in my GitHub was written while I was stoned out of my mind, so I'm probably helping, too.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 29 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Woo! My crappy code and group projects are in there too!

May all AI generated code be in one giant main loop thanks to my influence 😈

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Thinking back to the sins I've committed in C# as a high schooler... maybe I should start publishing my works. Put some poison in the soup.

[–] raman_klogius@ani.social 23 points 3 months ago

Literally all LLMs are affected by GIGO. This is why everything it outputs sounds like a redditor.

[–] Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 months ago (5 children)

you joke but someone has actually traced to one of my commits a specific behavior that people on the internet have been complaining from LLMs recently.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 69 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (9 children)

Also, all this reminds me of drama in the Skyrim and Minecraft modding scenes, when devs publish stuff under Apache or MIT or whatever.

Then the devs find out they don’t like what others are doing with their code. Drama ensues.


…That’s kinda the deal with permissive licenses. Or posting publicly, like here on Lemmy. People will do things you don’t like with your code or content.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 65 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Eh, I don’t think it’s hypocritical to contribute to a commons and then get mad when someone comes along and tries to use the commons to undermine the commons.

Like yes, the commons is there to be used… but not to kill the commons.

https://www.citationneeded.news/free-and-open-access-in-the-age-of-generative-ai/

[–] lemmyman@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's kind of a tragedy if you think about it

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Toga77@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago

Nah if you're a massive AI company and you scrape without contribution, you're a huge piece of shit.

It's just stealing plain and simple like anything else.

They're not a small user getting open source software, they're scraping what is already done to try and make you obsolete.

[–] amio@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

On the other hand, totally did not see this particular shit coming. I wonder if we'll see a rash of "permissive, except LLMs can fuck right off" licenses.

[–] Lev@europe.pub 11 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Permissive licences should be the ones to fuck off entirely. GPL or death

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I've said it before and I'll say it again: there is a place for permissive licenses. A great example is reference code for open standards, eg. TCP/IP.

[–] Lev@europe.pub 10 points 3 months ago

Permissive licences are useful compared to copyleft ones only for unfree actors, which we should fight integrally at every step of the way

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There are permissive licenses, and then there are copyleft licenses. Permissive licenses go in the direction of "do whatever the fuck you want". Copyleft licenses are more like "use it for whatever the fuck you want but if you change it give it back to everyone else with the same conditions". The people who have projects with copyleft licenses are the ones who are (rightfully) pissed about their projects being used to train AI.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Huggingface isn’t violating copyleft licenses here, I don’t think. And research projects that use it, with citations and documentation, wouldn’t either.

Now, if some business comes along and tries to make proprietary code derived from the dataset, that’s where things get hairy. But the people doing that are responsible for the potential violation, not Huggingface.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] heliotrope@retrofed.com 35 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Bad News: My old GitHub repos are there.

Good News: I wrote that shit when I was 12. The code runs, but it's not good and not inventive.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)

Well… I’d rather the dataset be public and there, with an ostensible centralized opt-out, instead of every AI startup frantically rescraping the same things their predecessors did.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

True, I understand why this is better than all those companies scraping it individually (for both ability to opt out and site load), but the way they handled opt out is still quite silly.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 26 points 3 months ago

Woof. They really went for it on my GitHub

Yes, there is code from 79 repositories in The Stack v3

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Genuinely surprised it's even opt-out.

These companies train on Disney DVDs. Permission is not a factor. Training is transformative use, as much for counting letter frequency as for building a chatbot that can sort of code.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 30 points 3 months ago (3 children)

no, officer, you misunderstand! I'm not pirating this movie, I'm just training my intelligence on it! it is transformative use, see, I can now write you this summary!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dextro@feddit.org 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

I don’t see a problem as long as they stick to AGPL when building a product out of it

Edit: Oh they also scraped my proprietary code 🧐

[–] TeaWithDani@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

So they scrapped stuff that wasn't permissive? Interesting... though not really surprising.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ProbablyUnwise@anarchist.nexus 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

meanwhile I'm just here scraping GitHub repos for API keys and credentials 🤷‍♂️

for legal reasons I must insist this is a joke, and in Minecraft.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 17 points 3 months ago (5 children)

A number of my repos are listed.

But the weird part is that it also lists a repo I don't recognize. The repo does actually exist on my github account, but it's marked as "ignored", and the description says it was automatically exported from Google Code. The code seems to be a MacOS shareware file encryption tool called "BitClamp", published circa 2008.

No idea how it got on my account.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

…and now, suddenly, github being overrun by vibecoded garbage isn’t so bad

[–] Untamed_Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 3 months ago

AI will poison itself trust, like when it links AI made articles.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Get off of Github if you think this is a problem 🤷 There are alternatives like Forgejo (Codeberg), Gitlab, and Radicle (decentralised).

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Those are obviously scraped as well?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bluedragon012@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Time to leave malicious code for Claud in git hub projects.

[–] cinoreus@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

I'm doing my part by already writing shitty code.

[–] iceberg314@slrpnk.net 10 points 3 months ago (9 children)

I'm not much of a programmer, but why arern't more people just using GitLab instead of GitHub?

[–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why go from corporate to corporate platform? Codeberg exists.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Self hosted gitlab is pretty nice, sucks that some features are still paywalled and it's been getting somewhat bloated after 18.x tho

[–] zarlin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 months ago

You can look into selfhosting Forgejo! No paywalls, and super fast, especially compared to Gitlab

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 7 points 3 months ago

Still learning git but apparently there's some "power features", and, aside from that, it's the same BS network effect that keeps everyone on all the abusive platforms.

Discoverability, it's where all the other people already stashed their code, sunk cost, etc...

Siiiigh...

[–] marius@feddit.org 7 points 3 months ago

Afaik on github you get quite powerful runners for free

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] TeaWithDani@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

In theory, it's all supposed to be permissively licenced code and the opt out is more than other models give. I saw Starcoder as one of the more ethical models. I thought the underlying principals to be fair at least.

I'm interested in this gut hostility to it regardless. Kind of shows how you can't present LLMs in a positive angle no matter what. They shouldn't be using anything GPL or similar.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 3 months ago (18 children)

Kind of shows how you can't present ~~LLMs~~ harvesting peoples data without consent or even warning and making it difficult to impossible for people to avoid it in a positive angle no matter what.

Fixed it for you.

An LLM built from only consensually provided data would be perfectly fine, as long as it works without environmentally ruinous data centers.

In fact, that was how EVERY LLM was to begin with, until regulatory capture and corporate impunity reached the current crescendo.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 7 points 3 months ago (4 children)

You can host copyleft as well as all rights reserved code on GitHub. It's not like Codeberg.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bieren@lemmy.today 9 points 3 months ago

If someone wants to scrap the shitty ass code I have on GitHub, have at it. Talk about poisoning AI

[–] bad1080@piefed.social 8 points 3 months ago

"our project"

load more comments
view more: next ›