this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2026
247 points (99.6% liked)

Progressive Politics

4979 readers
834 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

EDINBURG, Texas (AP) — Quinten Martinez, pumping gas under a hot South Texas sun, remembers a time when fueling up didn’t require difficult decisions.

“Is it going to be groceries this week?” asked the 28-year-old Amazon delivery driver as he watched the numbers tick higher. “Is it gonna be getting gas in our tank to go to work?”

He shook his head when asked about President Donald Trump’s assertion last week that higher gas prices are a small price to pay for the war with Iran.

“I don’t feel like it’s a good trade-off,” Martinez said. “I don’t feel like this is good for anyone.”

Voters across the country, and across the political spectrum, tend to agree.

(page 2) 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jtrek@startrek.website 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A lot of idiots will still believe the Republicans are "good at the economy".

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

True, but given the GOP's election losses in 2025 and 2026, not enough of them.

Not that it matters. Democrats won't do anything about affordability either.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not that it matters. Democrats won’t do anything about affordability either.

Yeah, the Democrats are a mix of assholes, ghouls, spineless jellyfish, and maybe some decent folks. It's sad that that's the best mainstream option, but I'd rather work with them than the frothing nightmares of the Republican party.

There's no good way out of this hell. But at least some socialists have won some elections

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think we're at the stage where we need a consitutional convention between states or just violence... like make the politicians scared to do ethical breaches.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s time for there to be 4 separate countries that each do thing their own way.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

4 little americas, ya.... who gets the nukes??

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Same as USSR. They stay where they were.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Dryad@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Oh yes. And what was it we were getting from the pedo in chief’s war of choice again?

[–] Murse@slrpnk.net 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh yes. And what was it we were getting from the pedo in chief’s war of choice again?

Global distraction from the Epstein files and the fact that Trump raped children on that island.

For the small small price of dead Iranians, dead Americans, and a fucked global economy, Trump can keep those in the news instead of the files! Winning!!

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

No this wasn't a distraction from the Epstien files, its been a long term republican goal. They've been trying to do a war with Iran since before the war with Iraq

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The only response he ever gives is "it's worth it so Iran can't have a nuclear weapon". He probably isn't even aware in his demented brain that... we already had that, nor that his and Biden's handling of the economy these last six years has increased people's poverty exponentially.

It was an "inexpensive price to pay" to let Iranians have their own unfrozen assets back in return for de-nuclearizing.

[–] gastroglizzy@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

“it’s worth it so Iran can’t have a nuclear weapon”.

Trump is the one who withdrew the US's involvement from the Iran Nuclear Deal, which specifically prevented them from building nuclear weapons.

[–] WitchKnight@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The irony of the US constantly justifying it's actions in dysregulating the middle east with nuclear arms when the US has some of the most nuclear arms and is one of the last countries on earth that should

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And even worse, we only really oppose nuclear proliferation because for other countries to have nukes would decrease the value of our bully pulpit. North Korea has demonstrated that nukes are now essential if a country wants to be left alone.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Don't you like converting your tax dollars into killing brown people across the world?? Someone has too right? We've been at it my whole life.

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Well, he and other rich cronies are getting richer! Ummm…. And let’s seeeeeee….. uhhhhhhhhhh distraction forom the plundering, Epstein, the continued slide to fascism.

Tremendous war, everyone is saying it!

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You mean the war trump unilaterally started to deflect from his pervert degeneracy? That war?

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

The kind of war of aggression we had the Nuremberg trials over? That war?

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

You could give me $100,000 and I'd say fuck off with your fucking war.

[–] voxthefox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you actually believe that then have the government subsidize the price difference at the pump? Oh what's this, you mean its inexpensive because you dont have to pay it? That's on brand.

[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I think they’re already subsidizing it as much as they can and it’s still this expensive - oil companies get direct subsidies, we’ve been dipping into the national reserve and they approved adding more ethanol to the gas to bring prices down and sacrifice our fuel economy and add wear to our engines.

[–] bad1080@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

trump says "but my cronies are making bank!"

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Kind of a bummer that I can't get in on those insider trading Signal chats he has.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What's old is new again.

A mere three years later we're being gaslit by a president with an evidently broken brain, who is clearly too old to be a functional head of state, and he's gaslighting us on the economy as if we don't have to open our own bills and do our own grocery shopping.

The only thing that's changed is the centrists are now pretending to care about affordability, where three years ago they were the ones telling us that things were just fine, even though our collective experience was that we were in a cost of living crisis. The shred of support Donald still possesses is insisting the same, though it's clear the crossover voters he gained in 2024 by pretending to care about affordability have been lost.

I wish I could get off this runaway train. Let's hope the dozen or so DSA's get elected and start some serious shit in Congress.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Well, from his POV no price is expensive if he's not the one paying it.

[–] laranis@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Do you see it yet, Magas? Do you?

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

See what? That he's a lying sack of shit that never intended to get them anything they wanted, or even ensure what they need?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Then he can pay for it with his money and his life. Shame he included his kids in his child sex trafficking operation, and his political career. They'll also need to be executed

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

If it's that small a price, he can pay it.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›