this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2026
450 points (99.6% liked)

Not The Onion

22541 readers
1136 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is basically the onion article : Teens Migrating From Facebook To Comments Section Of Slow-Motion Deer Video

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/52434607?scrollToComments=true

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1428372/kids-turned-the-comment-section-of-an-npr-podcast-into-a-group-chat-blocked-from-other-s

TranscriptIra Glass: Dave Blanchard runs the public radio show Wild Card. And one of the less exciting and, in fact, rather tedious parts of his job is that he has to keep an eye on the comments that people post about the show online. And one day last fall on Spotify, he saw all this activity about this episode they did with the writer Elizabeth Gilbert. And Dave thought, oh, her book was controversial. It must have struck a nerve, this episode. And then he looked at the comments.

Dave Blanchard: And it was just, like, gibberish. There was a bunch of new comments, but I couldn't make heads or tail of any of them. They're just these clipped, weird, incoherent postings that I was just like-- it screamed bots, just because anytime that I see just gibberish in a comment on the internet, I assume it's a bot. But the fact that they were all from different accounts seemed very weird. And the fact that they also maybe seemed to be interacting in some way also seemed weird and not like typical bot behavior.

Ira Glass: Can I ask you to read some of those comments?

Dave Blanchard: So yeah, I've got some from a later batch. We've got some where it's like, someone says, "Ah, OK, M-H." And two people have hearted that. Someone says, "Gilgamesh quit and I'm crying." "Last Friday I broke up with my GF." "Your cats are so cute." "You're gorgeous in that dress. OML, pink heart."

Ira Glass: So OK, bots, he thought, some newfangled kind of bots that respond to each other somehow. He deleted the posts.

Dave Blanchard: And I went back to the Spotify comments again. And there was a new comment that said, uh, so it deleted my com. And that felt not botty. That felt very strange that a bot would be able to recognize that the thread got deleted and post it, letting people know that it had been deleted.

Ira Glass: And then there were other responses to that.

Dave Blanchard: So someone says, username cotton/amity, parentheses, I'm back, bitches, commented, "Weird." Aubrey commented, "That's weirdss," two S's.

Ira Glass: This is really not looking like any bot behavior he'd ever seen. So he goes to NPR's Slack channels, post some screenshots, describes what these comments are. And one of the higher-ups, Matilde, suggests reporting it to Spotify, which Dave does. And then somebody younger at NPR reads the thread. They're 10 years younger than Dave-- Gen Z, not millennial, named Hannah Chinn.

Hannah Chinn: And I click into the screenshots, and almost immediately I'm like, oh. My conclusion is really, really different than Dave's and Matilde's, because I'm like, these are kids. And I think that part of that is because I was a middle schooler on the internet, posting on forums and stuff.

And so I look at their display names. Their display names are, like, Ella with five emojis. And they're the special character emojis. They're the ones that you have to go onto the internet and type your name into a special text generator, and then it comes out as a special character, and then you have to special paste it into your profile.

Ira Glass: Their profile pictures are all cartoon characters Hannah's never seen before. And then there's the way that they're commenting back and forth with each other, short little phrases. I'm sorry. That's weird. Lots of hi's, lots of extra exclamation points. Hannah recognized it. They grew up in a conservative home, was homeschooled, with limited access to social media.

Hannah Chinn: And so I was a kid who used weird parts of the internet not as they were originally designed to talk to my friends. I talked back and forth with my friends on Google Docs. And we would type things and then delete them, and then type things and then make them invisible by making the text white on the white background. So I think this is familiar behavior to me.

Ira Glass: So Hannah writes out a comment to post on Slack, shows it to their housemate before posting because they're worried about coming off maybe too harsh with these much higher-ranking, older NPR bosses who Hannah had never met in person.

Hannah Chinn: And I say, OK, maybe I'm wrong, but I think these are just kids hanging out and we shouldn't report them as bots. My guess is that they're just using Spotify comment threads as their group chat, maybe because other apps on their phones are blocked. Who knows? And they happen to have chosen a wild card episode to do it, LOL. These are middle schoolers.

Ira Glass: Middle schoolers specifically, not high schoolers?

Hannah Chinn: Yeah, these are people who are new to chatting with each other on the internet and in real life. They're kids who are excited to talk to other people on the internet. The goal is just to connect with people. You have nothing to talk about. You don't know each other very well. You're just seeing each other and acknowledging each other's presence in the chat.

Ira Glass: Dave reads Hannah's Slack message. And, well, he is not convinced. He posts--

Dave Blanchard: That's an interesting theory.

Ira Glass: Yeah, that's an interesting theory. There's an exclamation point at the end of it, at least to give it that much credit.

Dave Blanchard: Yes. Admittedly, I was still like, really? Again, this is Wild Card with Rachel Martin on NPR-- not our target demo to have a bunch of middle schoolers in our comment section. It just felt so completely implausible that these people would have found this particular episode as their place to chat.

Hannah Chinn: Dave is like, oh, that's an interesting theory. And I, at this point-- sorry, Dave. I don't know you in real life. I'm a little bit annoyed. Because I'm like, I know that I said "maybe I'm wrong," but I was so sure that I was right.

Ira Glass: Hannah does more digging, which makes them even more convinced than before. What the kids seemed to be doing was one kid would create a playlist on Spotify with a name like "Let's chat here." And inside that playlist would be one podcast episode.

And you know how you can see other people's playlists on Spotify if they make them public? Other kids would see that playlist. They'd see the episode. And then they would go to the podcast episode and start posting in the comments.

Hannah got back on Slack and pointed out that the kids were using a playlist that was named New Chat. The kids had also posted a Google Form with some kind of quiz on it and said, "Fill this out. Only cool people can fill this out."

Hannah Chinn: Bots don't really spam Google Forms in my experience, whereas Gen Alpha might use them in the same way that my generation would use uQuiz or the BuzzFeed Make Your Own Personality Quiz feature.

Ira Glass: And reading that was the turning point for Dave.

Dave Blanchard: When they were like, this is something that I did, that's what unlocked it. I think it was so implausible to me. And then when Hannah was like, no, I did this, I was like, oh, wow. I guess it makes sense.

And then it was like, I could go back and look at it again. And it was like, I had the lens on to see it. And I was like, oh, my god, they are kids. In retrospect, it looks so obvious.

Ira Glass: So how exactly did those commenters end up in the comment section of an NPR podcast? What exactly happened here? Well, we reached out to a bunch of the commenters. Only one of them agreed to talk to us.

As suspected, she is not a bot. She's a 14-year-old girl who talked to me from the car with her parents' permission and her dad at the wheel. Her name is Ella. When I asked her to describe herself, she said this.

Ella: I would say that I'm definitely a bit hard to get to know because I don't know a lot about myself yet. But I think if you do get to know me, you'll find out I'm a pretty cool person.

Ira Glass: Ella says this all started with a video podcast that played TikTok videos. Ella thinks a kid started it. The video seemed to be chosen specifically for kids who weren't allowed on TikTok, but were allowed on Spotify. That was Ella. She was allowed on Spotify, but on no social media. And she and the other kids would watch this girl's podcast on Spotify and then chat in the comments of the podcast.

Ella: And her podcast ended up getting banned. And we wanted to keep talking to each other, so people would make playlists.

Ira Glass: She described exactly the system that Hannah figured out. Kids would name their playlist "chat here" or something like that, and then there'd be some podcast, and everybody would go to that podcast and talk in the comments. She says it was maybe 20 kids in the core group-- lots of theater kids, she says, mostly girls, most of them with strict parents who didn't let them on regular social media.

Ira Glass: And can I ask, why did you guys pick NPR shows to be the ones where you went to in the comments?

Ella: I think we just looked for podcasts that didn't have many comments.

Ira Glass: I see. So you picked NPR because it didn't seem very popular.

Ella: Yeah, so that we wouldn't get caught up in other people's comments.

Ira Glass: I tell you, buddy, I do a public radio show, and that hurts a little to hear it.

Ella: [CHUCKLES] Sorry.

Ira Glass: That's OK. Are your parents NPR listeners?

Ella: Yeah, my mom is. She listens to podcasts all the time.

Ira Glass: Was any of this that your parents were NPR listeners, and this felt like this is the perfect cover? Like, if they catch you doing this, you can be like, look, I'm just doing this for an NPR show.

Ella: Yeah.

Ira Glass: Is that true? Did you think about that?

Ella: Yeah, a little bit.

Ira Glass: It's funny. There was this guy named Dave who works for NPR, and he's in his 30s. And he saw the comments that you guys were doing. And they made no sense to him at all. He really had no idea what they were. And he thought you guys were all bots.

Ella: Yeah. Some of them were really young, like 11 years old and stuff. So some of them definitely were a little bit not good at talking English that well. Or using slang.

Ira Glass: I got to say, I thought that was a very generous answer. Dave thought they were bots. And she was like, yeah, well, some of us kind of talked like bots. Ella told me she's sure someday she'll be clueless like Dave is now, which, of course, isn't much comfort if you're Dave. Dave says that once he understood that it was kids writing all those comments, it didn't feel great.

Dave Blanchard: One, I felt bad for having reported them. I definitely felt guilty. And two, old. I just felt very old, very dumb, very out of touch. I literally needed Hannah to be my generational translator. It was such a clarifying realization of my age and obsolescence.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 hours ago

It would be trully spectacular if the age validation and social media restrictions laws yielded a rebirth of 90s-style Internet (which was vastly superior and yay more decentralized than the hypercomercialized grift-central bot-riddled shit we have now)

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Many years ago my nephew showed me how they were using a googe docs live collaboration as a "chat" with their school chromebooks.

Hopefully this will turn them more computer savvy.

They’re still doing that. Along with doodling apps. Draw text or use text boxes. Source: my kid logged in to their school acct on my computer and didn’t log out. I get to see what’s going on.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Children, today we are going to learn about i2p and ramble. Make your pubescent brains everyone’s problem again, per tradition.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 34 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (4 children)

Kids are ingenious.

I had a Dreamcast when they released but my parents didn't want me to have the web browser disk in my room (I was a teenager).

I noticed that some menus in some online games look suspiciously like a web page. As it turns out some of the online games shipped with a lite version of the browser which was used for account maintenance stuff (I think it was an MMO, but it's been a while) but you couldn't access the address bar so it seemed like it wasn't very useful.

I eventually discoveted that if you found the Help -> About screen with the lite browser open there was a link to the official forums.

On the official forums, I searched the comments until I found a Google link and once I had a Google search bar, I didn't need the address bar anymore.

I only used these powers for good. (I was a teenager)

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 hours ago

I only used these powers for good. (I was a teenager)

First time I've seen that specific spelling of "porn".

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

In high school we had the old imacs running macOS 9. Some accounts had the web browser icons removed for the crime of observing tits on a CRT. Those guys figured out if you open PowerPoint you can abuse it into opening Internet explorer for you, no need for at ease’s cooperation.

Simpler times with similarly motivated teenagers.

[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

my parents used to take the mouse away sometimes when they would leave me alone in the house. Turns out windows has a function where you can use the numpad to replicate the mouse called "mousekeys". I also only used this power for good

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 hours ago

Right or left handed good?

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 4 points 4 hours ago

Now I want to use the power of mousekeys for evil.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

(I think it was an MMO, but it’s been a while)

I bet it was phantasy star online (2?)

[–] betelplouf@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago

Well dooone

Didn't AI bots do this when they were prohibited from communicating with each other?

Except they found some random misconfigured wiki.

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 29 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

It really is amazing that given how long humans have been around that so many of the older ones have yet to learn that the one thing that will for sure make the younger ones want to do something, and find creative ways to do it, is to try and prevent them from doing it.

Hell, it is not even necessarily just young people. Look at the lengths prisoners go to in an effort to get around jailhouse restrictions.

Nothing makes people willing to find a way to do something like telling them they "can't do it". Spite is a powerful motivator.

[–] NotAnOtter@lemmus.org 14 points 9 hours ago

The motivations of kids are generally pretty obvious - most parents know exactly what it is their kids are wanting to do. And kids will work to accomplish that motivation despite what roadblocks the parents put in place, and at somepoint they will figure out a strategy to remain undetected.

Parents don't really get a vote WRT their kids having sex or doing drugs. They get _some influence over the details of how those occur, if they show they can be trusted to not freak out.

[–] iatenine@piefed.social 112 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

To be clear, this is a good thing:

New generation's should be finding creative solutions to building a community rather than inheriting one controlled by a 40 year old billionaire with every incentive to continue manipulating their behavior in ways that don't align with their self interest

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Hacking shit (in the original meaning of the word: "making something do what it wasn't originally meant to do") is how us older folk started going down the path of making Tech (not to be confused with mindless Tech followers) in the first place.

You see a similar learning effect with modding.

[–] jdr@lemmy.ml 27 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Idk about you personally, but I reckon most people here who were online in the 2000s were doing so mostly without supervision. It didn't take much skill to avoid filters, shoulder-surfers, upstream blocks. We weren't geniuses to do that either. All the smart kids I meet figure out what's to access the raw web without permission or filters. It didn't stop us, and it won't stop them.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Also the kids who figure it out will tell other kids how to do it, if only for the kudos and brag factor.

Unlike in the "walled garden" shit that the Internet has turned into nowadays, in the non-digital world and original internet people just talk to each other without the surveillance, content bots or algorithmic experience shapers.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 16 points 10 hours ago

One thing is that in early days they hadn't really sorted out the full potential of manipulating online interactions yet. So we got to enjoy connection with relatively less active manipulation.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 12 points 10 hours ago

Agreed, there are a ton of options out there for social media that aren't algorithmically-weighted.

They could even make their own page easily on Neocities.

[–] EmilieEasie@fedinsfw.app 16 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah personally I'm kind of, like, impressed. I keep hearing that kids these days are so used to frictionless devices that they have no problem-solving skills whatsoever when it comes to tech, but, today's kids actually aren't that different than yesterday's.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 5 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

There were just as many kids yesterday that can't handle tech issues as there are today.

I can only think that people that believe differently clearly don't work on any sort of technical support roles at places with a variety of worker ages. When you see the gamut of retirement age employees down to 18 year olds and everyone is calling for simple things all the time, the age stuff is a bit ridiculous.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 2 points 4 hours ago

Yep, the only difference is the speed people can understand and follow instructions, which goes down with age. But technical affinity is not age related.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rozodru@piefed.world 24 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

reminds me when I built a star wars themed website in the mid to late 90s on Geocities and I wanted a forum but I didn't know how to make a php forum (nor had I anywhere to host it) so I found this defunct Star Wars forum and kinda just hijacked it and linked to it from my site and made threads on there.

Kids are smart. they'll find a work around for just about anything. Age verification doesn't work except when it comes to the companies that thirst for the data it provides.

[–] LeighWeighTacoma@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

If you're feeling nostalgic, GeoCities might not exist anymore but NeoCities does.

[–] brognak@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 10 hours ago

Ha, I wanted a cheats site and did the exact same thing, Geocities and hijacking content included 😂

Note passing...will find a way

[–] Soupbreaker@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

I heard this TAL the other day, and thought it was a repeat of an old episode. I'm surprised to learn that it wasn't, and wonder where I originally heard about this phenomenon. Probably on some other podcast, I imagine, but I can't recall which.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 141 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Oh look…. Age verification doesn’t work.

[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 89 points 16 hours ago (8 children)

Clearly we need to age verification even harder, how dare those children try and form social connections /s

I gotta say keeping away from those for profit big tech algorithmic nightmares and finding small semi private places to connect, this might be a kludgy but effective compromise.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] radiofreebc@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It's like the $GME apes using the comment section of the Gangnam Style video on YouTube as their message board whenever reddit goes down. The next time reddit goes down, check it out, it's pretty funny.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago

How would I know if reddit goes down? They wont let me even view old.reddit without an account. Its over, and reddit was the one who ended it.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 34 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Ella's and the others' parents ought to be proud their kids are so resourceful, and apparently used the secret chat harmlessly.

Hannah's parents should be proud their kid their kid not only figured it out but stood up to their fuddy-duddy old bosses and proved they were right.

Probably none of those things will happen. But Ira and Dave should promote Hannah.

Nah, idk. They should probably tell them that they can read all their messages.

Then give them a workshop on encrypted chats.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 68 points 15 hours ago (15 children)

In sum, kids couldn't use tiktok or other apps because the parents blocked them, but could use Spotify. After a kid's podcast was blocked, they wanted to keep the conversation going so they created playlists called "chat here" that linked to podcasts with few comments (to avoid real comments getting mixed up).

My thought was mostly that I used MSN, ICQ and AIM back when I was their age... why aren't chat services like that not an option? Oh right, I guess that'd be WhatsApp or Discord in 2026, which is also kinda dubious.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 19 points 11 hours ago

IRC is still around.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] bunkyprewster@startrek.website 6 points 10 hours ago

Life finds a way.

load more comments
view more: next ›