this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2026
1459 points (98.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

33844 readers
1391 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 57 minutes ago

It's a honey pot of a different color! Genius!

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

You have chosen Death by chancla

[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 13 points 9 hours ago

His wife is not Italian. If she was he would not even dare to do anything of the sort.

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

All these people setting up filters don't understand it is supposed to train you in case a real phishing attempt is made.

Those filters aren't going to stop real ones.

But if you want to blow up the database server you need to work on because you couldn't be bothered to click a button when a phishing test comes around, then you better quit your job in tech.

I swear, developers are some of the biggest security concerns in any company. They complain the moment some access is blocked for good reason. Much bigger concern than old nancy "never-had-a-computer-at-home" clicks-a-lot.

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 4 points 4 hours ago

If the fake phishing emails can be caught by my very rudimentary filter they weren't particularly good anyway. Besides, I still have to look at those emails and report them, otherwise my IT still counts it as a strike against me. Win-win. IT continues to keep me on my toes and I don't have to take another 30min training course because I ignored an email for a day or two.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 38 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds kinda like the Tale of Foolish Curiosity from Don Quixote. Spoiler: the wife was a good woman and wouldn't have cheated on the guy... until he started being an asshole by subjecting her to endless tests to prove her virtue.

[–] mig@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago

I've been meaning to read Don Quixote and this is the tipping point. I want to make quixotic references.

[–] Mika@piefed.ca 23 points 21 hours ago

Just don't read the mails and you won't get fished

[–] threeonefour@piefed.ca 205 points 1 day ago (42 children)

My current company makes it real easy. All their simulated phishing addresses use the fictitious TLD of ".corn" so I just setup an email rule to filter them.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 points 41 minutes ago* (last edited 41 minutes ago)

Oh man y'all remember the actual phishing campaign of messages from customer-service@bankofarnerica. com?

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 9 hours ago

So what do you do when you get an actual phishing mail that doesn't use that TLD?

[–] IndignantIguana@piefed.social 69 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

JBJTAc9nY83cYHV.png

An actual email sent by my company. (not representative of their usual)

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 5 points 4 hours ago

I delight in reporting genuine emails from my company that look like sophisticated phishing attempts, bonus points if they send a follow-up assuring us that the previous sketchy email was in fact genuine.

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That’s a crack it open with a hex editor, find who sent it, delete then return a note to the sender letting them know you’ve removed the problematic communication, thankyouverymuch.. signed ABiggerCuntThanYou@WhyIsMyCompanyWastingMoneyOnThisShit.org

[–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 53 minutes ago

That's how you get assigned to IT overflow tickets, NGL. 😅

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah if anyone falls for this lock them out of their computer immediately.

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 17 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Clearly he's trying to trick you into pressing the "Report Phishing" button, which must be some sort of a trap. I'd check the attached document for further clues, especially since he's telling me not to. Must be something interesting there

[–] korazail@eviltoast.org 26 points 1 day ago

That's pretty cool. Gets the point across - and the reason and results of why it matters to report instead of ignore. Kudos to your team.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 155 points 1 day ago (25 children)

I know this is a leap, but for some reason reading this made me want to buy a domain like virus.porn and make it the most wholesome, lemmy community on the planet.

[–] LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip 47 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 41 minutes ago

"Handling The Big Jobs, Too"

Lolol

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 61 points 1 day ago (3 children)

A company I was in a few jobs back had several layers of IT department, there was the local studio department that handled our everyday stuff and a "head office" somewhere far away that set policy and handed out budget and whatnot.

One day "head office" IT decided it was a good idea to send out some fake phishing emails to "test" us. They didn't tell the local IT department about it, I guess they were also being "tested". My manager received one and only recognized it as a phishing attempt after he'd clicked just one too many things for it to feel safe to ignore. So he yanked the power on his computer and contacted the local IT department, as is protocol when something potentially dangerous just happened.

The local network went into lockdown while local IT tried to figure out if something actually dangerous had happened. It cost the studio as a whole several hours of work time, which for a studio our size translated to an obscene dollar cost. Nobody on our side of things did anything wrong, even that one extra "dangerous" click my manager did wasn't something he could be blamed for - head office had crafted the fake phishing attempt well and his reaction to it would have prevented damage had it been real.

Head office never tried a stunt like that again.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (37 replies)
[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 36 points 23 hours ago

Note that at no point does he claim this "proof" is falsified.

[–] Trigger2_2000@sh.itjust.works 58 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Just read this to a beautiful woman I know.

Her response: That's not going to end near as well/funny as you think/hope it will.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 54 points 23 hours ago

Neither is your future if your wife maintains such easily exploited vulnerabilities.

[–] ElChinchilla@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Blink 8 times if you're in danger

[–] MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 63 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Blink 182 times if it's just all the small things

[–] Trigger2_2000@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago

Did they make a song about that?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 76 points 1 day ago

My knee jerk reaction is to calmly explain why this isn't appropriate in a corporate environment.

I'm so broken.

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 37 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I saw one with a bunch of maga triggers. The Democrats are doing what!? 😱 they click every time.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SparroHawc@piefed.world 50 points 1 day ago (9 children)

I failed one of those because I have script blockers on my browser and I wanted to see what the scam was.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›