this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2026
597 points (98.7% liked)

Memes

17578 readers
1569 users here now

Post memes here.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.

An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.


Laittakaa meemejä tänne.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TrackenDaKracken@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Once, when I was flying on stand-by, I missed a flight because it was full, and had to spend ~14 hours in the Honolulu airport, because I couldn't afford to get a motel room, or anything else. All I had in my pocket was the return ticket. All I had was the water from the water fountain. The next flight I got the very last seat, and it was in the smoking section. Ugh. But, I took it. Fortunately, I was so exhausted from getting almost no sleep the previous day, I slept through the entire flight. It took hours to clear that shit out of my lungs.

This was 40 years ago.

[–] Egonallanon@feddit.uk 49 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Shit like this is why I avoid flying wherever possible. Such a miserable experience. I yearn for the day they finally somehow build that train tunnel across the Atlantic.

[–] DekSomBoon@lemmy.today 40 points 3 days ago (3 children)

This is also why travelling by train can often be overall faster than plane, despite the train being slower. The station is in the middle of the city, no security check, the platforms are closer to the street, etc.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 14 points 3 days ago (5 children)

If the two locations are close maybe, but most of the time I would say theyre not remotely as fast.

You can fly from New York to LA in 6 hours. On a train it would take like 3 days

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Depends on what type of train it is. A passenger aeroplane travels around 800 km/hr, a 'typical' train about 150-200.

However, the highest average speed of a commercial train is reached by the Fuxing, which goes 320 km/hr, enabling to go from Beijing to Nanjing (1,020 km) in 3.2 hours. The Shanghai maglev used to go faster, about 430 km/hr. So a train can certainly be faster than a plane on mid-long distances if we take pre-flight time into account.

An experimental Maglev, the L0 Series, managed to go 600 km/hr. At that speed, you're honestly directly competing with planes at long distances.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Meanwhile Amtrak trains: 74mph, unless you're on the Acela, then top is 150mph.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Try closer to 30 average. Most rail isn't rated for above 50 outside the Northeast Corridor, and you're also pausing for hours at a time sometimes because freight rail gets priority treatment.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (7 children)

Only because US train system is biased toward freight.

Not complaining, it is what it is.

That said, I don't see any pragmatic way to build passenger high-speed rail across the US. Every state would want it to run for them - otherwise they won't support it. Then every city, etc.

Edit: for straight shots (point-to-point) across vast distances I don't see train ever matching planes (like NY to LA)

[–] XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The US rail network is already kind of a disaster. A lot of major cities don't even have passenger rail stations at all. There are entire STATES that don't have a single amtrack station lol.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It would be most feasible to have like three high speed rails in the US. Up and down both coasts, and then east coast to west coast through the midwest, Denver, SLC etc.

That alone would be enough to replace a ton of car and plane trips, even if it didn’t provide service everywhere

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] brian@programming.dev 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

unless you're in the US riding Amtrak. it's never not been delayed for me, frequently by several hours

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm lucky if the Amtrak station in my relatively large city has a departure time during waking hours

[–] brian@programming.dev 7 points 2 days ago

yeah my last train was scheduled at 2am (only option out of my largeish city) and was delayed until 6am

[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Several hours is surely an exaggeration. There's actual data to disprove that.

https://amtracker.net/stats

I see two hours on average as the worst.

[–] brian@programming.dev 1 points 20 hours ago

I take a round trip around every Christmas in particular, so it may be seasonal. but also, an average delay of 2 hours is absolutely indefensible and doesn't contradict what I said?

They said "frequently by several hours", you're talking about averages. Due to where I live, the only route I've taken regularly is on the list of worsts, and has definitely been several hours behind schedule on a significant proportion of the times I needed it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BruisedMoose@piefed.social 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

There is no way in the name of all that is good and holy in this fucking world I'm getting in a 3000 mile tunnel under the ocean.

Would it be any less safe than flying? Probably not. But for some reason I would rather fall out of the sky and die than be crushed and drown.

[–] XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago

Honestly it probably would be way less safe because the network of pumps and fans and whatnot that would be needed to keep that tunnel both DRY and oxygenated would be insane. I'm also pretty sure the trains would need to be built like submarines to prevent the atmosphereic pressure from crushing them? Or maybe the tunnel? It honestly seems like an engineering nightmare.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 51 points 3 days ago

Given that your dad had to pay for the plane tickets and probably won't get any refund if you miss it, and flying is fucking expensive, I side with your dad on this.

[–] Furbag@pawb.social 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Crackpot tinfoil hat time: TSA telling you to be there so early when it almost never takes that long to get through security is a conspiracy by the airport stores to get you to eat, drink, and shop more than you otherwise would if you timed it better.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago

The most boring yet most common type of conspiracy: Nobody planned this situation, but now that it exists and somebody is making money from it, we are going to drag our feet "fixing" the "problem."

[–] TrackenDaKracken@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I mean, maybe? Big corpo business certainly has the ear of our government agencies. I wouldn't be surprised if the request was made, and granted for an extra, generally unnecessary hour added to the recommendation.

[–] speckofrust@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Two hours is plenty. Never missed a flight and I’ve been on many dozens, unfortunately. If I want to eat, drink, or shop beforehand, pretty much anywhere is cheaper than an airport, so I’ll do it elsewhere.

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip 18 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Once in Seattle I showed up at the airport 3 hours early, didn't realize there was a big game that had gone in the day before, and only baaaarely made it to my flight on time. Wasn't even international.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Drekaridill@lemmy.wtf 19 points 3 days ago

My dad almost had a heart attack when I told him my flight was in 2 hours. Check in ended up taking 30 minutes and then I just waited for my flight.

[–] blargh513@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm sure I sold my soul to the devil, but I did TSA PRE and CLEAR. I spend maybe 5 min going through security.

My soul wasn't doing much anyway, but MAN is it nice to just breeze through without waiting.

Then I am in boarding group 38 where you are not allowed to carry anything more than your feelings onto the plane and your seat is behind the toilet. You have to get up every time someone wants to take a shit. I ain't paying SHIT for a seat upgrade, fuck that.

idk the sheer volumes of shit what come out of me, i kind of prefer that seat

[–] anewfox@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

fun fact, the four hour figure comes from average wait times during a rush at LAX and then, for some reason, got applied to every airport at all times.

[–] Corn@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It saved my ass in Incheon when I went to the wrong terminal, spent 30 minutes walking around, had to spend 30 minutes on a bus going to the correct one, spent 30 minutes in line, then got delayed by another 30 minutes at check-in due to visa concerns, it was close enough they put me in the priority lane for security and I got to the gate literally as soon as my section was boarding.

It's a well-managed airport, it's just too damn big.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I've never flown in the US; I live in the EU and generally aim for 2 hours if I have checked baggage, 1.5 hours if not. That usually causes me to still have significant waiting time after the security check, but better safe than sorry.

[–] Duhtocqueville@ttrpg.network 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Airport and airline dependent. I’ve waited an hour and a half to check my car seat for a budget airline.

TSA are equal opportunity haters and don’t care if you got to the airport two hours ago and your flight is in 30 minutes. They tell you to get in their line 2 hours before your flight and by god sometimes they are gonna make you wait two hours.

Edit: oh yeah also waited an hour becuase my budget airline wouldn’t let me print boarding passes and said “see agent” but didn’t staff any agents. Turns out they want to make sure your one year old is actually a baby and you’re not just a cheapskate trying to hold a twelve year old in your lap.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Evil_Incarnate@sopuli.xyz 20 points 3 days ago

I aim to get there ridiculously early, and have a beer or coffee while I wait. There have been times when the airport train was cancelled, so I want to know that I have time to use an alternative route.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I live in a small town on an island with 8k people in it that has its own international airport. I arrive an hour before if I have checked bags, drop bags off, go home, pick up the family, drop them off at the airport, drop the car off next door at my work, walk back to the airport, walk through security and board the plane.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kamen@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

If I don't have checked in luggage I usually do one hour before take off.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago

On our recent trip home we were stood in the check in queue for two whole hours while nothing moved due to some problem with border control. The airline barely said anything about it, and when most other desks had cleared their queues ours had still barely moved. Ugh. But they did tell us that the flight wouldn't be leaving without us.

[–] warbond@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

On my way out, from my normal airport, I've got it timed pretty well so that I leave my house 90 minutes from boarding and I'm through security with 15-30 minutes to spare.

On my way back, from the scary unknown airport, I like to arrive at least 2 hours before boarding, because who knows what kind of crazy hoops you're going to have to jump through.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] spectrums_coherence@piefed.social 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They actually only starts check in 4 hours prior to the flight. Don't ask me how I know, I don't have a life.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That must differ depending on airline/airport. I've never been able to check in sooner than 2 hours before any flight I've ever taken

load more comments (1 replies)

What the hell are you talking about? They say 2 hours, not 4.

[–] ashenone@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I prefer to get to the airport plenty early. I always have a book with me so I can just hang out and read without stressing about time.

[–] JonnyRobbie@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Once me and my wife discovered the magic of airport lounge bars, we appreciate the time before departure.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ITGuyLevi@programming.dev 7 points 3 days ago

As early as my wife will allow. Hurry up and wait is just how life is to me and I have no issue sitting in a chair patiently... My wife does not feel the same and I'm okay with that, we understand how each other feels so we just leave when she says it's okay lol.

[–] desu@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The airport won't take luggage less than 45 minutes before the flight so that's when I check in.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

In Denmark, the official recommendation is 2h, most people do 60-90 minutes, and it seems to work fine.

Granted, the airports here tend to be significantly smaller and the people fewer, but I still say that better organization (AKA optimizing more for user experience rather than 100% only for squeezing every penny out of everyone) and less understaffing are crucial factors as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›