"Let's circle back to this"
Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
"Could do."
perhaps
"fine...whatever."
For some reason, I'm never successful at linking to specific times in YouTube videos (yes, I tried &t=35s
), but try about 35 seconds into this:
maybe....just maybe.
are you gonna answer the question?
maybe.
“ostensibly”
Ahhh yeah naww
My prof usually says "jain", which is "ja" and "nein" merged.
suuure, with this exact amount of "u"s
3 seems to be the golden rule for that kinda thing
Kinda
Would "fuck you!" Fill in the void? I have a feeling that yes, Indeed it would.
Fuck you
Confirmed! LOL!
I do think it depends heavily on inflection.
It's got to have that friendly familiar drawn out "fuuuuuuck you" that connotes "yes, you're right", "I disagree", and "fuck you" simultaneously.
Yeahnah
Yeahnah.
In the US it's common to say "Yeah no".
"maybe"
Maybe is more, "I don't know, but it is possible"
I think op is taking about a situation where a statement/question is partially true, but also partially untrue. Like "Do some things fall faster than other things because they're heavier?" The answer is "kinda but not really".
"In an atmosphere" is the proper response to that question because it isn't kinda true, it is entirely context dependent.
maybe
Sure
Sorta?
Nja in Norwegian. Nei + Ja.
"Doch" is more like a logical "not" (¬).
Example:
Alice: "Bob, you don't like apples. Bob: "Doch" (Bob likes apples)
I've always thought of doch as an affirmative where a negative was expected.
I don't think its about the expectation of a negative, but rather it specifically disagrees with a previous negative, saying it is in fact positive. Doesn't work with disagreement in general, only when the challenged statement was negative.
That's clearer, I agree.
Ní in spanish.
Jein in German.
Nór in Faroese.
Perhaps
Sort of.
I think a fitting substitute would be Jein/Jain, coming from combining Ja(Yes) with Nein(No). Although I feel it doesn't perfectly match the 'but' part, It feels close enough that it's the only thing I could think of.
When sticking to German I would rather suggest a slightly bored mumbeld "Jooaa..."
Jein is different.
Yeah, right.
Mal sehen