this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2025
478 points (92.1% liked)

Technology

76415 readers
3437 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new study published in Nature by University of Cambridge researchers just dropped a pixelated bomb on the entire Ultra-HD market, but as anyone with myopia can tell you, if you take your glasses off, even SD still looks pretty good :)

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Solitaire20X6@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I think age makes a big difference, too. I'm over 50 and I've never been able to really tell between 720p and 1080i and 1080p, much less higher resolutions. And I'm nearsighted.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bobaworld@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

I know I am a display tech nerd, but can people really not tell the difference? Even going from a 1440p to a 4k monitor to me was a very noticeable improvement to clarity. And there's a huge difference in the way that games look on my living room TV in 1080p compared to 4k.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 24 points 14 hours ago (6 children)

Bullshit, actual factual 8k and 4k look miles better than 1080. It's the screen size that makes a difference. On a 15inch screen you might not see much difference but on a 75 inch screen the difference between 1080 and 4k is immediately noticeable. A much larger screen would have the same results with 8k.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 17 points 14 hours ago (8 children)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 10 points 13 hours ago

And publish it in Nature, a leading biomedical journal, and claim boldly.

[–] richardwallass@sh.itjust.works 6 points 13 hours ago

With 44 inch at 2,5m

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I like how you’re calling bullshit on a study because you ~feel~ like you know better.

Read the report, and go check the study. They note that the biggest gains in human visibility for displays comes from contrast (largest reason), brightness, and color accuracy. All of which has drastically increased over the last 15 years. Look at a really good high end 1080p monitor and a low end 4k monitor and you will actively choose the 1080p monitor. It’s more pleasing to the eye, and you don’t notice the difference in pixel size at that scale.

Sure distance plays some level of scale, but they also noted that by performing the test at the same distance with the same size. They’re controlling for a variable you aren’t even controlling for in your own comment.

[–] SeriousMite@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

This has been my experience going from 1080 to 4K. It’s not the resolution, it’s the brighter colors that make the most difference.

[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 6 points 12 hours ago

It’s the screen size that makes a difference

Not by itself, the distance is extremely relevant. And at the distance a normal person sits away from a large screen, you need to get very large for 4k to matter, let alone 8k.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Surp@lemmy.world 29 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

8k no. 4k with a 4k Blu-ray player on actual non upscaled 4k movies is fucking amazing.

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 11 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't know if this will age like my previous belief that PS1 had photo-realistic graphics, but I feel like 4k is the peak for TVs. I recently bought a 65" 4k TV and not only is it the clearest image I've ever seen, but it takes up a good chunk of my livingroom. Any larger would just look ridiculous.

Unless the average person starts using abandoned cathedrals as their livingrooms, I don't see how larger TVs with even higher definition would even be practical. Especially if you consider we already have 8k for those who do use cathedral entertainment systems.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (6 children)

(Most) TVs still have a long way to go with color space and brightness. AKA HDR. Not to speak of more sane color/calibration standards to make the picture more consistent, and higher 'standard' framerates than 24FPS.

But yeah, 8K... I dunno about that. Seems like a massive waste. And I am a pixel peeper.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sir_Premiumhengst@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

It does make a difference for reading text like subtitles or navigating game menus.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] oppy1984@lemdro.id 6 points 12 hours ago

I have friends and family with good eyesight and they can tell a difference. Sadly even with Recent prescription lenses I still can't see a difference. Eh, at least I can save on TV's since 1080p is cheaper.

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Anecdotally at average viewing distances on my 55" TV I can't really tell a difference. If I had an enormous TV maybe I would be able to tell. 1080 > 2160 is for sure not the leap 720 > 1080, or 480 > 720 was in the average environment that's for sure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 26 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

4k with shit streaming bitrate is barely better than high bitrate 1080p

But full bitrate 4k from a Blu-ray IS better.

[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

But full bitrate 4k from a Blu-ray IS better.

Full Blu-Ray quality 1080p sources will look significantly better than Netflix 4K.

Hence why "4K" doesn't actually matter unless your panel is gigantic or you're sitting very close to it. Resolution is a very small part of our perceived notion of quality.

[–] DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 14 hours ago

4k is definitely a big improvement over 1080p. The average person probably doesn't have good eyesight, but that doesn't mean that it's a waste for everyone else.

[–] 46_and_2@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

If you’re sitting the average 2.5 meters away from a 44-inch set, a simple Quad HD (QHD) display already packs more detail than your eye can possibly distinguish. The scientists made it crystal clear: once your setup hits that threshold, any further increase in pixel count, like moving from 4K to an 8K model of the same size and distance, hits the law of diminishing returns because your eye simply can't detect the added detail. 

I commend them on their study of human eye "pixels-per-degree" perception resolution limit, but there are some caveats to the article title and their findings.

First of all, nobody recommends a 44-inch TV for 2.5 metres, I watch from the same distance and I think the minimum recommended 4k TV size for that distance was 55 inches.

Second, I'm not sure many QHD TVs are being offered, market mostly offers 4k or 1080p TVs, QHDs would be a small percentage.

And QHDs are already pretty noticable quality jump over 1080p, I've noticed on my gaming rig. So basically if you do the jump from 1080p to 4K, and watch 4k quality content, from the right distance - most people are absolutely gonna notice that quality difference.

For 8Ks I don't know, you probably do get into diminishing returns there unless you have a wall-sized TV or watch it from very close.

But yeah, clickbaity titled article, mostly.

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Really depends on the size of the screen, the viewing distance, and your age/eye condition. For more people 720 or 1080 is just fine. With 4k, you will get some better detail on the fabric on clothes and environments, but not a huge difference.

8k is gonna be a huge waste and will fail.

[–] caboose2006@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

I've been saying this for years.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›