this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
144 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

78828 readers
2523 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think that it's interesting to look back at calls that were wrong to try to help improve future ones.

Maybe it was a tech company that you thought wouldn't make it and did well or vice versa. Maybe a technology you thought had promise and didn't pan out. Maybe a project that you thought would become the future but didn't or one that you thought was going to be the next big thing and went under.

Four from me:

  • My first experience with the World Wide Web was on an rather unstable version of lynx on a terminal. I was pretty unimpressed. Compared to gopher clients of the time, it was harder to read, the VAX/VMS build I was using crashed frequently, and was harder to navigate around. I wasn't convinced that it was going to go anywhere. The Web has obviously done rather well since then.

  • In the late 1990s, Apple was in a pretty dire state, and a number of people, including myself, didn't think that they likely had much of a future. Apple turned things around and became the largest company in the world by market capitalization for some time, and remains quite healthy.

  • When I first ran into it, I was skeptical that Wikipedia would manage to stave off spam and parties with an agenda sufficiently to remain useful as it became larger. I think that it's safe to say that Wikipedia has been a great success.

  • After YouTube throttled per-stream download speeds, rendering youtube-dl much less useful, the yt-dlp project came to the fore, which worked around this with parallel downloads. I thought that it was very likely that YouTube wouldn't tolerate this


it seems to me to have all the drawbacks of youtube-dl from their standpoint, plus maybe more, and shouldn't be too hard to detect. But at least so far, they haven't throttled or blocked it.

Anyone else have some of their own that they'd like to share?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

That texting would be so popular. Coming from pagers to actual cell phones and being able to hear people talk anywhere was amazing. Going back to text messages seemed counterintuitive.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

When the first dotcom bubble burst, I predicted that big companies would buy up all the major websites for fire sale prices and put them behind subscription paywalls. “Pay $30/month and get access to all 400 sites in the Yahoo network.”

I underestimated how easy it is to spin up alternative sites. Most of the media brands I thought of as valuable then are shit now, or gone.

And, like everyone, I didn’t anticipate social media. Even Google was still nascent at the time.

[–] hanrahan@piefed.social 3 points 6 days ago

Everything ? I though MS Office woukd fail becase no one will want to close source their data files, i was using an Amiga at the time at home and the file format was standard and you chose the app to use

It started there and just progressed, Apple was a big one, people won't buy into their closed wall'd shenanigans. Wrong again.

Messaging, what a debacle that has turned into. I assumed the system would be standardised and the fight would be over the front end for interoperability, wrong again.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 114 points 1 week ago (12 children)

In the mid-nineties I passionately believed that the internet would democratize information and usher in a wonderful new era of well-informed critical thinking and general enlightenment. Basically the opposite has happened.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

It did that, but we had an overly rosy view of what “democratize” meant. We thought that citizen journalists would leaven the bulky corporate media of the time. And they did. But there was also a torrent of bullshit. We have no excuse for not seeing this. The Greeks and Romans spent a great deal of thought on what would happen if the rabble were given a voice. We dismissed their ideas as gatekeeping oligarchy, but it turns out that populism is moatly a dirty word.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 60 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Man I think all of us mistakenly thought this. The early internet had such promise.

[–] thelivefive@startrek.website 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think the Internet still has lots of promise. We just did a capitalism on it. If we can get the cancer out it'll be an amazing thing again.

But I do think some of that early promise was overestimated because mostly smart people were on it then. We thought it was the medium, but it was just techies or people with hobbies or interest that made it that special place, now that your average Joe is there it's mostly shit, but go somewhere with a little barrier to entry (like Lemmy) and it is pretty cool again.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 week ago

I often think about an Arthur C. Clarke book—I think Songs of Distant Earth?—that has a colony of humans that solves all the big debate questions facing their society anonymously through the internet, which has completely solved the problem of judging ideas based on who said them.

Bless the optimists.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I sold all of my Apple stock because they wanted to make a phone and I thought that would end poorly, so I should take my profits while I could.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 20 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I mean, the Newton hadn't done well. The Pippin hadn't done well. The eMate hadn't done well. What were the odds of Apple doing a really successful new consumer electronics product?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zak@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I thought people would learn how to use computers.

It seemed as if most of the millennial generation in wealthy countries did learn to some degree and I expected it to be even more true for younger generations. Those more sophisticated users would enable more sophisticated and flexible applications. Technology would empower individuals while weakening corporations and governments.

Instead, the most reliable recipe for popularizing tech is to dumb it down. Millennials represent a peak of digital literacy (in wealthy countries) and those younger tend to have weaker technical skills.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mech@feddit.org 34 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Around 2009 I predicted that very soon, Linux smartphones you can plug into a docking station to use as a desktop PC would become the standard consumer computing device.

[–] Janx@piefed.social 19 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It's so obvious, I wish they had caught on! I remember there was a failed Ubuntu phone Kickstarter for exactly this...

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I thought drones were just going to be a fad, but they've become huge, especially in terms of government and corporate surveillance. I should have realized the way it was going when America started using them militarily. American military inventions almost always end up becoming popular consumer products/applications.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Yaky@slrpnk.net 28 points 1 week ago (3 children)

When Steam first appeared (and was required to play Half-Life 2 IIRC), I thought that was a ridiculous idea to have a middle man to play a game. Well, what do I know, everyone loves Steam now (yet hates on other launchers).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zealotte@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 week ago (4 children)

"Nintendo should admit defeat and focus on making games for other platforms and mobile devices." - Me, after the Wii U and a little before the Switch launched.

[–] Peffse@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (4 children)

"No parent is going to buy a Wii because of the stupid name" -me, 2005

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Dekkia@this.doesnotcut.it 27 points 1 week ago (9 children)

When the 3DS came out I was sure it would be a stepping stone to 3D TVs that didn't require glasses.

3D TVs basically died out by now.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In the late nineties, I thought the availability of online knowledge would make universities obsolete.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I thought Apple/most smartphones would never move to USB-C, or away from proprietary chargers. Pleasantly surprised - thank you EU.

I thought wireless controllers were going to be a fad, or at least garbage in their reliability/connection strength.

I thought VR was finally going to take off as the next major gaming experience when the Vive came out. Unfortunately it remains niche.

I thought Linux was going to be unusable for gaming/mainstream use cases for much longer, but Valve has made huge strides on that with Proton, and OSS devs making things like Heroic for other stores has been awesome. Also shoutout to KDE for, well, everything. Krita, KDE connect, Plasma. LibreOffice has also come a very long way.

I also thought we’d never get another steam controller. Also pleasantly surprised.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ebolapie@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I wrote a term paper once about how twitter would enable citizen journalism and lead to a more informed public and a healthier, more direct democracy. I got an A.

I was a pretty huge fan of Zune and I still miss it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 23 points 1 week ago

The Wii. Previous gen console specs. Silly gimmick controller. Best selling peripheral was a step.

Most popular shit in the history of everything.

[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I never thought tablet computers would become popular among the mainstream public.

When the iPad first came out, it was functionally worse than even the cheap netbooks, and I didn't see much purpose in the larger screen with phones getting bigger and bigger every year. Wireless display was also already available, so I envisioned people would just cast content to a TV if they really wanted a bigger screen. Even reading articles etc seemed to be already covered by eReaders, which were already available for half a decade by the time the iPad released.

Little did I know how brain rotted people would become.

Tbh I personally still don't see the utility in most tablets, except in specific niches like in digital note taking/drawing, or industrial cases where it becomes a glorified HUD.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I thought cameras on phones were a gimmick. To be fair, they were pretty low quality back then but I still use it to remind myself not to be too overconfident because boy was I wrong.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Around 2000, graphene was a very hot material. I was pretty excited by it and thought carbon-based high-Farad capacitors would essentially replace lead acid and lithium ion batteries in most consumer electronics within a decade, maybe two.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 20 points 1 week ago (4 children)

"Bitcoin will never take". I mined a few at the very beginning when it was easy, out of curiosity, and didn't bother backing up because it was useless anyway. Ahem.

[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mined a bit too. Got almost 2 bitcoin in 2 weeks. Figured it was a pyramid scheme, went back to running folding@home. Forgot my wallet passphrase.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Physical buttons on phones would win out over gimmicky touch screens

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Acidbath@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I hate microsoft but really liked windows phone and cortana. Something about tiles made a lot of sense and the keyboard was clean af.

I am very sure they were the first to have url bar above the keyboard in their browser WHICH WAS VERY HELPFUL BECAUSE YOUR FINGERS ARE ALREADY AT THE BOTTOM HALF OF THE PHONE LIKE OMFG.

like there was so many little things they did that just worked and worked well. rip windows phone, i will tell my grandkids about you.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 4 points 6 days ago

I really wanted the Linux/Qt/Jolla phone to happen. They still haven't refunded the other half of my deposit...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] orclev@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

In the late 90s I saw a piece demonstrating an optical 3d storage system that had a capacity about an order of magnitude greater than the at the time brand new HD DVD and Bluray discs. I assumed this clearly superior format that already had a working demo would obviously kill other optical media. Turns out nobody could figure out how to manufacture one at a price anybody was willing to spend.

[–] aqua_cat@pawb.social 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I never thought game subscription would take of. The entire concept is stupid to me. Pay per month to *acces selected games but not own them? Take into accoumt 90% of people will play at most 25% of the catalogue. Let's do some math if PS Plus Essentials, where you get 2-4 random titles per month is taken, which costs 9€ per month which if you play down to 25% of the catalogue goes up to 36€ per month (that is you basicly pay 36€ to play that single game which was chosen at random and you still don't own). For that ammount of money I can buy a REAL game I OWN or 5 good games on Steam Sale or GOG.

Still I guess if it sounds good people will smoke it.

To be clear these statistics are purly "Trust me bro" but I doubt someone will play Core Keeper, Disney Epic Mickey: Rebrushed and NFS: Unbound all in one month enough that it makes sense, and if you can more power to you, but I know those are not most people. Most people play Minecraft or Elder Scrolls or COD or GT etc.

Still feel free to express yours opinion.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›