this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
405 points (99.0% liked)

Europe

10326 readers
1398 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago

The damage goes beyond the economic, it shattered the UK's soft power. Without that soft power the UK was left at a disadvantage at every negotiating table.

Further, one could argue that the fracturing of UK/EU relations paved the way to today's war in Europe, as almost all attention was pulled onto Brexit and none was given towards declawing Russia.

If there were any real justice in the UK, Farage and the brexiteers would all be up in front of a judge on a charge of treason. That they lied before is forgivable (they may well have believed their lies), but that many continue to do so now given the breadth and depth of evidence is beyond remotion.

[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 41 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (4 children)

Right.

So HOW IN FUCK'S NAME is it that Nigel Farage and his party are leading the polls? You know, the very same Nigel Farage who was pushing the lie and admitted on television the very morning after the referendum that it was a lie?! Help me make sense of this, dear UK!

[–] Teppichbrand@feddit.org 17 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Truth is we're all screeching baboons. We just covered our asses with garment. We're generous and caring in small groups but incredible stupid and distrustful in large numbers.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 20 hours ago

"Democracy is by the people, for the people.but the people are retarded"

[–] thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works 6 points 20 hours ago

given his party are trying to:

  • piss off pensioners by flip-flopping on the triple lock
  • piss off almost all minorities by saying they’re not really british, even with settled status
  • piss off white van man by having 50% of kids go to trade school to shortly take all their business
  • piss off former tories by ripping up the ECHR
  • piss off almost everyone disabled, gay or diverse in any other way by ripping up the equality act

I expect reform support to skyrocket.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 26 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

It was never about economic stats, right? If the British public poured over graphs and forecasts, they would not have voted for Brexit.

In other words, if you sent this report back in time, I’m not sure it would make a difference. It’s all about personal anxieties and feels.

[–] yeah@feddit.uk 16 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not really disagreeing but there was also a big lie in the campaign putting out "we send the EU Β£50million a week. Let's fund our NHS instead" some people definitely bought into the nonsense.

[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 11 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

*350

Boris' Bus of Lies with the caption is even in the thumbnail

[–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Amazing that none of them looked into this and realised we actually got more back.

At the time I worked with a man from north Wales, who voted Brexit cause south Wales got the bulk of the money assigned to Wales. Make that make sense.

[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

None of them looked into it because facts don't matter to far-right populists and the sheep voting for them. They just make up shit that fits their simple narrative of the moment and makes people angry. And when (not if) it is debunked as a blatant lie later on, they have already captured their audience with ten new lies, so the implosion of all the older lies won't register with them.

I get that perverted 'logic'. What confounds me is that so many people seem to be falling for this shit. I had a more optimistic idea of people's intelligence on average. And: I don't like what this finding means for future-proofing our democracies, if we're going to save those.

[–] Tetragrade@leminal.space 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

idk I feel like if you can fit it on a chart with red bits, it'd work ok.

might need a compoface newscaster as well

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Would it, though? Maybe things were different in the UK, but in ~2017 it felt like social media had a tight grip on folks in the US, not newscasters, and from my distant observation it seems like that was a big factor for Brexit.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Literally can ot interact with this site. Get a pop up about push notifications, No button doesn't respond. Then another pop up. Site's broken. And I'm really sick of wrestling with an entire Internet that's the same.

[–] debil@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

Firefox + uBlock Origin on Android here. The site works alright.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 39 points 1 day ago (40 children)

maybe next time dont listen to russian propaganda.

load more comments (40 replies)
[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 20 hours ago

Yeah no shit sherlock

[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago

Who could have thought that separating yourself from one of the top 3 economies in the world would have negative consequences?

[–] copacetic@discuss.tchncs.de 177 points 1 day ago (13 children)

This leaves Britain as a rare modern case study: a rich country that deliberately raised barriers to trade and cooperation and paid the price.

I’m not convinced yet. Please, would another country with an even bigger GDP deliberately raise barriers to trade and cooperation?

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί