this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
549 points (91.5% liked)

World News

46247 readers
2165 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

To this day, she remembers the racing thoughts, the instant nausea, the hairs prickling up on her legs, the sweaty palms. She had shared a photograph of herself in her underwear with a boy she trusted and, very soon, it had been sent around the school and across her small home town, Aberystwyth, Wales. She became a local celebrity for all the wrong reasons. Younger kids would approach her laughing and ask for a hug. Members of the men’s football team saw it – and one showed someone who knew Davies’s nan, so that’s how her family found out.

Her book, No One Wants to See Your D*ck, takes a deep dive into the negatives. It covers Davies’s experiences in the digital world – that includes cyberflashing such as all those unsolicited dick pics – as well as the widespread use of her images on pornography sites, escort services, dating apps, sex chats (“Ready for Rape? Role play now!” with her picture alongside it). However, the book also shines a light on the dark online men’s spaces, what they’re saying, the “games” they’re playing. “I wanted to show the reality of what men are doing,” says Davies. “People will say: ‘It’s not all men’ and no, it isn’t, but it also isn’t a small number of weirdos on the dark web in their mum’s basements. These are forums with millions of members on mainstream sites such as Reddit, Discord and 4chan. These are men writing about their wives, their mums, their mate’s daughter, exchanging images, sharing women’s names, socials and contact details, and no one – not one man – is calling them out. They’re patting each other on the back.”

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] randomname@sh.itjust.works 14 points 9 hours ago (6 children)

99% of men are disgusted by this type of thing, but with billions of people and instant communication. this type of thing is bound to pop up. and because normal people aren't looking at this type of thing, they're echo chambers of degeneracy. but it really bothers me when people use sex based generalizations for things like this. millions of people isn't very much on a global scale.

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

99% of men are disgusted by this type of thing

wow. naive.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

As a man, it's also reasonable to say this is nearly non existent among women. Does it happen? Of course. But not nearly to the scale it happens among men.

It's moreso a matter of semantics. If someone says "Men are disgusting", you don't have to take it literally. It's conveying the meaning that there is a large enough amount of men that are doing this that it is a massive problem in nearly every woman's life. The saying would be a bit less valid if it was so extremely prevalent. But as it stands, I can go up to just about any young woman, and they more than likely would have (at least) been sexually harassed by a man.

So sure, with as many people as there are, it's "bound to pop up" but saying it that way seems to undermine just how prevalent it is. And correcting a statement that expresses the sentiment that this is a large problem by saying "But not all men are bad" is counterproductive. They are talking about the systematic issue among men. You could instead respond with "Yea, we need systematic changes" or something along the lines that address the concern they are raising.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 6 points 8 hours ago

But as it stands, I can go up to just about any young woman, and they more than likely would have (at least) been sexually harassed by a man.

Thats's most certainly accurate, since in the US, 1 in 5 women have been raped over the course of their lives.

So, Sexual harassment would be far more likely. I'd guess, 4 in 5 women, if not 5 outta 5.

[–] randomname@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

When I said it's "bound to pop up" I was talking specifically about the online communities mentioned. I don't disagree that there are systemic problems but I think that they were focusing on a specific and small subset of a larger problem.

I might be wrong about this, correct me if that's so. but because most men aren't rapists, yet a surprisingly high number of women get sexually assaulted/raped, It seems like the problem is not that most men are predators, but that our society is letting the minority that are get away with it repeatedly.

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

because most men aren’t rapists, yet a surprisingly high number of women get sexually assaulted/raped, It seems like the problem is not that most men are predators, but that our society is letting the minority that are get away with it repeatedly.

It's much muddier than that. Most cases of rape are someone the victim trusted. And most of those cases don't ever get reported to authorities. So there are many men may have taken advantage of a woman, and that woman see's him as an abuser, but nearly nobody in that mans life even knows about this. The victim may stay silent for any number of reasons. There are almost definitely cases like that involving men you know, but are unaware of what they did. As for the solution to these cases? Societal norms need to change. Consent needs to be required every time no matter what. There should never be pressure for sex, and peers should not encourage pressuring a woman into sex. Instead, the man will say the person stepping in is "cock blocking" when in reality they're defending someone who doesn't want to have sex with them. Men will back up other men in an attempt to help their bro "get their dick wet". They will get women drunk in hopes they will have reduced inhibitions, or perhaps so drunk they don't even remember the night. This is not as simple as "lock up the bad guys" when very few cases of rape involve being snatched up off the street.

When I said it’s “bound to pop up” I was talking specifically about the online communities mentioned.

Gotcha, I misunderstood what you were saying. I do still disagree that groups like that are bound to pop up, at least not as much as they are right now. I think womanizing groups are far more common than dedicated racist groups online. Racism has taken a massive downward trend over the last hundred years. Of course, it is not fixed, very far from it. But I also think it is undeniable that racism is less of a problem than it was 50 years ago. That is the kind of societal change we want. If the internet were around 50 years ago, the insane number of group chats dedicated to racism would have been far larger than they are now. Bringing awareness to these issues, and especially men standing up to other men, is what will help bring a decline to the number of vocal sexist pigs and their echo chambers.

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

It's the same as everywhere, those who scream the loudest get heard

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 20 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

If anyone is unsure why women would chose the bear...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] F_OFF_Reddit@lemmy.world 29 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

Sending unwarranted dick picks should get you a sizeable fine, maybe 600 bucks and a 2 year registry in a sex offender list.

Give you a choice to stop fucking up and if you escalate and keep doing it then things get worse for oyu.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 11 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

Unsolicited naked pics have no place in society. We're not talking porn here, we're talking Joe sending a picture of his schlong to Mary like she is going to be ohh yeah let's do that.

People with that mindset are seriously damaging other people. They're the reason women are afraid to go on walks at dusk.

The penalty for that deserves some staying power. You're on the list; to get off the list, you need counseling and a psych eval. I'd go so far as to say mandatory house arrest until you get the counseling and eval.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Why an expiry? It's the digital equivalent of flashing someone. In australia that gets you a six month sentence, a $1,100 fine, or both.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 18 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

It would limit watering down the register with 'minor' offenses. It would also help avoid trapping an idiot teen in a negative spiral, due to a stupid drunken mistake 10 years previously.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Dating in general these days seems like such a ugly slog I don't understand how people even find time to do something productive and play this dating game.

Feels like marriage is becoming very much desired again huh.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›