this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2026
431 points (96.5% liked)

World News

55819 readers
1623 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And, a recent tour of one of the Asian powerhouse's vehicle plants has proved this beyond a shadow of a doubt, at least to Honda President and CEO Toshihiro Mibe.

"We have no chance against this," Mibe said upon a visit to a Shanghai parts factory, commenting on its seamless automation across all levels of production. Logistics, procurement and all aspects of the process were so automated, in fact, that he did not spot a single human worker on the supplier's floor.

Ford executives saying even three years ago that China was way ahead of the game

Toyota's CEO has likewise said regarding not just his company, but the industry in general, "unless things change, we will not survive"

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] treesquid@lemmy.world 61 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"We took zero action to compete and relied on protectionism and other forms of corruption to stay in business knowing that China was pulling ahead, we refused to plan for the future and harvested all the money for our owners instead and now we're fucked unless you bail us out! Not the owners, of course, who could afford to bail us out, they will continue siphoning money even though they're clearly incompetent, we need your taxes" ... How about no?

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Capitalists sound strange when they are faced with actual competition. That's... kinda the whole point guys.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe you should have kept up and innovated instead of just trying to stifle your competition and enshittify your products idiots.

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But think of the short-term shareholder value! Have you no decency?

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] quips@slrpnk.net 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

almost as if competition is what capitalism was always supposed to be about

[–] quips@slrpnk.net 11 points 2 days ago (5 children)

No, thats what markets are about. Capitalism is about making money by stealing other people’s surplus labor value.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"We insisted on fossil fuels and now Chinese electric car companies are eating our lunch, boo hoo"

Cry more fat capitalists

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Won't somebody PLEASE think of the shareholders‽

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 29 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Back in the 80s, American cars got really, really crappy, and that's when Honda, and Toyota, and later Hyundai, Daiwoo, and Kia were able to get market share. American car companies got their shit together, and started making cars that could compete again. So here we are a few decades later, in the same spot.

These scummy Capitalists get a taste of luxury, and they start getting lazy, while the Asians continue to crank away like they're in last place. In the past, the Capitalists finally wised up, and got back into the game, but the current crop are so breath-takingly ignorant, that I doubt they could even recognize that they're in trouble. If someone were to try to explain it to them, they'd probably just attack back.

The Japanese and Koreans will get their shit together. America won't.

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

"we've built a model based on charging an assload of money for features that barely work and China is making cheap cars that do the job better. Because, you know, the cheap bullshit we've been building. If you force us to compete again we'll lose!"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's capitalism.

¯\(ツ)

[–] laranis@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Time for bailouts and layoffs!

That's US capitalism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bridgeburner@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

China will soon, or prolly has already, be the number 1 country. US oligarchs are just focussed on getting richer instead of trying to advance humanity technologically.

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

A nation can enrich it's elites in the short term at the expense of its people, or it can invest in its people (education, commons, etc) at the expense of its elites.

The west, and especially my cesspool the US has made its choice.

China has been heavily building up its commons and infrastructure in the same 40 year span the US has let its commons and education fall into utter ruin in order to sell economically segregated education and gated communities for private profit.

The US is culturally indoctrinated to be hostile towards the very concept of society. Imagine resenting paying into universal healthcare because you don't want to accidentally pay for your countrymen's "bad decisions" like... Eating food.

I go on Rednote quite a bit. The US attitude towards China, just like non pure crony capitalism is "they are evil and from hell" for being a society. Their people, not their politicians, their people, are sweet, intelligent, and mostly treat Americans with an "are you guys OK? We've heard (true) horror stories."

Thats humanity. Why would I want my schaudenfreude and greed ruled cesspool to "win?" It's not about winning, it's about the wellbeing of ALL your people. If the US dominates the world culturally, all that would mean is that humanity stands for "fuck you I got mine" at which point I have no comradery with my species whatsoever.

Actual human worth/value is measured in empathy for one another, which makes the US destitude in what matters.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BioDriver@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Then stop being greedy fuckers

[–] RosaLuxemburgsGhost@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago

Maybe the workers at Toyota, Ford and Honda should take control of these plants. They would run it better without the capitalist leeches squeezing out every ounce of profits into their own pockets.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 198 points 4 days ago (28 children)

Well that's capitalism. It's what you wanted right? Competition to keep you on your toes?

Looks like the invisible hand of the market favors what the people want more than what bosses think we can take.

load more comments (28 replies)
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I dunno how the Japanese and Koreans will do, but I 100% guarantee that the American companies will do absolutely nothing, whine about it to their child rapist in chief and then get a massive government bailout paid for by ordinary Americans.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 49 points 3 days ago (18 children)

OH NO! THE FREE MARKET IS WORKING BUT NOT IN OUR FAVOR!!!

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I cannot wait to see legacy auto disappear. It’s about time they failed. It’s fucking absurd that the most expensive piece of tech I own has a 15fps display with touch response rate measured in seconds, rather than milliseconds. They did this to themselves.

Legacy auto did nothing to compete with Tesla software, and they came out over a decade ago.

Oh, and they took the ‘10 bailouts and did fuckall with them. They didn’t take the bailouts and make a suddenly better product.

[–] Burninator05@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

that he did not spot a single human worker on the supplier's floor.

I know that workers cost money to have but eveytime I read something like this I wonder if the corporations take into consideration the decrease in the number of people who may be able to purchase the product in the first place.

[–] RosaLuxemburgsGhost@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

When you have an economy that isn’t capitalist, you can plan it…and extracting surplus value from workers isn’t necessary. You can automate your industries without destroying the quality of life of the people….in fact, you improve it because people can work less.

It really is that capitalism has exhausted its usefulness and ability to advance society. It is now socialism or barbarism.

[–] MacAttak8@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I have had this same thought and I feel like I’ve come to a realization. If companies can cater to the desires of the top 10% or so, they can make more money. Why sell 200 $5 objects when I can cater to the affluent and sell 6 $250 objects.

I see this constantly with Automobiles and construction. Auto manufacturers do not make the cheap baseline cars for the most part Because they’ve realized they can make more money manufacturing the fancier vehicles /trim levels with higher margins.

Same thing with new buildings; affordable housing is not what is being built. You only see fancier, expensive construction, with higher margins, being constructed.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

How many of those companies spent literal billions of dollars on stock buybacks to inflate share market price over the last decade instead of investing in the people and facilities and products to remain competitive. Even if there is dumping I doubt it's anywhere near the combined spent on share price inflation buybacks & savings instead of investing in the workers and business, these companies enjoy unjustified tax breaks and subsidies from their governments as well.

This is a the economy being equated to wealth/investor class problem. Workers in and around cities want cheap affordable evs & charging infrastructure for renters, mechanics and parts producers want to build and work on affordable evs. People who own stocks expecting growth returns and executive compensation want to sell 10 cars a year for a trillion dollars each if they could.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe 119 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Good these are companies that fought the transition to EVs every step of the way. Toyota in particular. Which was ironic after releasing the Prius

[–] Geologist@lemmy.zip 53 points 4 days ago (12 children)

Toyota is way too conservative. After nailing hybrid tech early on, it seems like they wasted the opportunity to put it on every vehicle they make which would have been such an amazing step forward, instead of treating it as a weird niche for so long.

Also that bz4x or whatever deserves a spot on the worst cars of all time list, just straight up ewaste.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] WhoIsTheDrizzle@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I would bet that Chinese auto manufacturers aren't taking 6 billion a month out of their company to pay shareholders in stock buybacks. Maybe reinvesting in the company to remain competitive is in fact, a good strategy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh no my portfolio... Seriously, there's something called competition, it's been around for a long time. If Chinese companies continue pushing ahead while US companies remain complacent then that's just what will happen. These older car manufacturers have had DECADES to prepare for the newer battery tech to design and build good affordable BEVs, but they just didn't.

This is what happens when billionaires try to steal the future. Read about the General Motors EV1. Oil companies have fought against the development of EV charging infrastructure in the US.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Binturong@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Cold Take:
Good. They don't deserve to survive. Demand will ensure industry bounceback and stability long term, at least nationally as new buniesses fill the void and labour recovers. Mind you, the US industry will probably never compete globally again having collectively chosen to just lag behind technological trends toward efficiency and sustainability to appease fossil fuel entanglements. These companies made the decisions they did not to adapt at a critical turning point and this is the result, and their current rhetoric is an artifact of decades of coddling by a lopsided nanny state spoon-feeding subsidies and bailouts to shitty investors and executives with garbage management practices at the expense of public services and infrastructure. There is no too big to fail, that's capitalist coping propped up by a corrupt and captured economy that THEY lobbied for.

In short, get fucked, and take your CEOs with you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

Aw, Capitalism not working out for you car manufacturers? Awww, that’s too bad.

[–] chocrates@piefed.world 20 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Herp my derp look who is mad about the "free market" now?

Don't come crawling to us for bailouts this time

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] etherphon@piefed.world 50 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Well I guess your high paid CEOs and executives really fucked up then, right? That's exactly what you were saying? Because everyone else saw this coming from miles away, and we have been clamoring for these kinds of cars for a long ass time, even small gas cars are hard to find now. So what are those guys paid such high salaries for if they are so completely dense...?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 41 points 4 days ago (9 children)

Okay, so you're getting out-competed in the market. Pay proper wages, invest in innovation instead of executive salaries, and take a slimmer profit margin to help your customers.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 4 days ago (14 children)

Don't charge $100,000 for a regular fucking vehicle?

Seriously, all the useless expensive shit they add to vehicles to make them unmaintainable data miners is why they're going to get slaughtered.

Give me an electric pickup with 4WD and crank up windows. Preferably no radio. I'd buy one of those Slates in a heartbeat if it were 4WD, as much as I hate Jeff Bezos.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)

That’s the problem with disrupters, people are so involved with dismissing them that they don’t see what’s happening. For years it was all about cheap Chinese labour then turn around and discover that it’s really all about robotic factories and slick organisation. Throw in EVs and it’s the same but worse.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 75 points 4 days ago
[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 37 points 4 days ago (10 children)

automation across all levels of production

Maybe its true. Regardless, article sounds like anti-worker propaganda to me. China is gonna eat our lunch! Better take a pay cut, and be glad you're not laid off!

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] imahappyguy@lemmy.world 48 points 4 days ago (14 children)

Aww man, China is dumping to gain market share for EVs? That's crazy. If only car manufacturers had adapted to EVs sooner and researched more into better battery technologies, they might not be in this position. Get fucked. This whole, every car has to be super luxorious in America is getting ridiculous. I looked at a rav4 last year and the "features" they included in the base model was mental. I just want my car to go when I press the pedal. Brake. And a CD Player. I don't need half the shit they put in American market cars. Doesn't help that I have a large family that needs to travel far, frequently. So, my hands are tied with getting an SUV. I'd kill for a better train transit in America. Next car gets to be an EV though. Cause that's the sedan.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 67 points 4 days ago (16 children)

I've been wanting Honda to make an affordable all-electric car for years. Based on how BYD is selling, I'm guessing I'm not the only one.

Instead they keep making bigger and bigger, gas-guzzling vehicles, with bells and whistles we don't need, saying that's what sells and they can't make an electric vehicle they're happy with.

Well, too bad. It seems I've bought my last Honda, sadly, because my next vehicle will not burn gasoline.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›