this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
63 points (95.7% liked)

politics

23488 readers
17 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Israel launched a campaign against former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger after he blamed the Israelis for the breakdown of his mission to achieve an interim agreement with Egypt following the 1973 war, according to declassified British documents

An Israeli source close to Rabin told the ambassador that the Israeli prime minister believed that Kissinger “had tried to deliver the Israelis to Sadat” and he (Kissinger) “had become angry when he found that it would not work”. Rabin came to the conclusion that “he only wished he could talk directly to the Egyptians” without Kissinger’s go-between.

At a dinner with visiting US Congressmen, Shimon Peres, then Israel’s defense minister, accused Kissinger of “humiliating” him, complaining that he played role in delaying his important visit to the US. Peres asked the Congressmen to “say as much (about Kissinger claimed behaviour) when they returned to Washington”.

Another player was Yehoshua Rabinowitz, then Israeli minister of finance who was also informed by Washington that he must postpone his visit to discuss economic aid yet once more. Sources told the UK ambassador that Rabinowitz understood that he will not be received until the re-assessment of American Middle East policy was completed. Rabinowitz detected the “hand of Kissinger in the repeated delays of his mission”, the sources said.

The dispatches from the British embassy in Tell Aviv indicated that the Israelis were talking “as if they were convinced that Kissinger himself is the chief organiser of the present wave of American displeasure which has reached such heights”.

Senior official in Israeli Foreign Ministry Yeshayahu Anug strongly criticised Kissinger in a conversation with the UK ambassador. He said “for the first time we saw him (Kissinger) behaving like a Jew”. Anug argued that when the shuttle went wrong, Kissinger “behaved as if he had been personally betrayed by the Israelis and lost his cool completely”.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 6 days ago

Israel is a shit state that creates problems.

[–] libra00@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Kissinger was Jewish, so that was antisemitism. That's how it works (according to Israel), any political statement or action made against anyone who is Jewish is antisemitism, right? :P

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

You're trying to be a smartass, but Kissinger has some quotes that certainly imply it.

https://www.newsweek.com/henry-kissinger-say-i-would-antisemitic-jewish-something-wrong-1848303

I'd suggest reading the whole thing, it's shockingly factual for a Newsweek article, though they do treat a politician's words to another state as believable at face value while saying he was obviously joking about the other things.

I guess notorious war criminals and bad dudes can't lie on the clock?

I tend to buy their interpretation overall, but it's also worth noting that there's a ton of further background context that makes it ultimately just as likely he was more honest about his "jokes" than it appears.

[–] libra00@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

That's interesting. Like it seems that, like most people, he had a complex relationship with his heritage and the way it manifested in the world. But what's especially telling is despite him making the antisemitic comment about breaking of the 1973 ceasefire it turns out he gave them the green light to break it, so that makes it seem like that comment might've just been an act for the benefit of others. Saying the equivalent of 'Oh lawd, those silly Israelis are breaking ceasefires again', etc, to conceal or misdirect from his involvement in giving them the go-ahead.

But also this isn't particularly relevant to the joke I was making. Which is that Israel calls anything said or done against Jewish people for any reason antisemitism, so I was turning that back on Israel for doing/saying things against a Jew. It's funny regardless of Kissinger's relationship with his ethnicity/religion or Israel because it's about Israel, not Kissinger.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Where can we read the documents this author is referencing?

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

the British National Archives

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 6 days ago

Oh yeah the British national archives really narrows it down.