this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
497 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

85212 readers
4023 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] usernametbd@lemmy.zip 8 points 22 hours ago

Use LibreWolf instead. Fuck Brave.

[–] InfernoWarrior@piefed.social 1 points 16 hours ago

This is why I use Waterfox paired with DuckDuckGo tbh. Brave is a scummy company.

Brave sucks, lol, I use other browsers

There's no way people will actually pay for this, right? ... right?

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 1 points 22 hours ago

Awesome, monetization of enshittification.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 day ago

"Origin" is a peculiar choice for a version name. I wonder if they're trying to go off of the popularity of a common extension

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 day ago

Brave runs an ad network.

[–] graynk@discuss.tchncs.de 305 points 2 days ago (16 children)

Yet people keep recommending products by this scummy company and pile on Firefox for slightest missteps.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 165 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

Mozilla should be scrutinized, even if Firefox is currently the best option.

I think the only thing keeping them inline is loud community backlash everytime they make one of those misssteps.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 52 points 2 days ago (3 children)

People dont seem to be scrutinizing though. Its genuinely unhinged and often completely misinformed. They will jump on a single line of a legal text and use it to springboard into a world of scenarios even when Mozilla is saying its not true.

It doesnt help improve the product it just makes people think all products are bad and fallback to whatever the comfortable majority is which is chrome.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] graynk@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think everyone should be held to the same standard. We can yell at Firefox a bit less. We should yell at Brave a lot more.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] oce@jlai.lu 51 points 2 days ago

They removed the paw, they are worse than Chrome! I'm going to use an alternative version that cannot exist without the main project to teach them a lesson!

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 67 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Firefox users stay winning. I love how mad some people are about Firefox.

[–] coolmojo@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago

I am not mad about Firefox. I am mad about Mozilla.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I feel like if you're writing the sentence "an optional, paid version of our browser that offers Brave [...] without its extra features," you need to sit back and take a long, hard look at yourself.

[–] kunaltyagi@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

Adds features and asks for a payment to access the toggle buttons

hahahahahaha

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 134 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Brave has always been a joke. And Brave users will always be a joke. And anyone who’s ever simped for Brave will always be a moron.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 65 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Rude. But not inaccurate. Brave pretends to be better than Chrome and Google, but also Mozilla and Firefox at the same time, though Firefox has always done it better and has never contributed to the chromium monopoly. Greed over diversification of the Web and competition between browser engines to effect real change. The least Brave could do is make their own engine.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 47 points 2 days ago (5 children)

The bad news is, if you're not on Team Tux, you're going to have to pay $60 for Brave Origin. Granted, you only need to buy it once, and you'll get unlimited activations across all of your devices.

It's amazing people still believe this BS.

load more comments (5 replies)

Fuck that leaky browser. Asshole development.

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 20 points 2 days ago

That’s a brave move.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 57 points 2 days ago

Brave lets people use Origin for free if they're on Linux

lol

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Explanation: buy a new one with updated back doors.

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Are brave and Plex related?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 54 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Brave thinks its users are suckers

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] yestalgia@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (11 children)

I read the article.

But also I'm out of the loop on why ppl hate Brave. Can someone clue me in?

Is there a better cross-platform browser? I like to use the same one across devices.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't have a strong opinion on brave, but here's some reasons I can think of:

  • cryptocoin shit
  • based on chromium (so using this instead of firefox, for example, increases google's hegemony -- and this is true: even though chromium is open source, google completely controls its direction)
  • CEO is a homophobe
  • scammy business practices like inserting affiliate codes in urls

And this is just the stuff that I know from the top of my head. I don't particularly care about this topic, so I'm sure there's more. Although, having written all this out, I can sense that my opinion of Brave has worsened significantly.

[–] Newuser@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Isn't it open source ? Can someone build a fork with all of this shit removed ?

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It's based on Chromium, which is open source. It IS the fork.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Yeah I guess. Doesn't really change any of the arguments against it though. I mean, it's good that it's open source of course, but the ceo is still a homophobe, for example. And it still chromium based, and so on.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 day ago

It's sold as a privacy-focused browser but it doesn't actually have a good track record or features for it. The company has made several questionable choices.

Firefox or fork of choice plus a couple of extensions

[–] l3mming@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Firefox, or its fork Librewolf if you really value privacy.

[–] yestalgia@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I'm using waterfox as my dedicated porn browser and have found few faults. Maybe I'll go that direction for my main browser.

I tried LibreWolf and had issues that I can't remember now.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›