
arotrios
Company that built the torment nexus declares that the nexus may torment. Stock prices rose on the news.
L4D2.
$0.
Christmas of 2013.
Yes, I am the Ghost of Christmas Present...
I think this gal has a better chance at making it to Mars than Liz...

Great. Plague bears. Didn't have that on the 2026 bingo card....
Not gonna be impressed until they teach it to fetch.
There's a couple of reasons. It's easy to learn, especially in comparison with what came before (I still have nightmares about CGI). If you already had HTML locked down, it's wasn't a big jump to coding PHP, whereas Javascript was less noob friendly. This meant that a lot of opensource web content management systems got built first on PHP. Wordpress has been mentioned, but that's ignoring the larger structural CMS systems like Joomla and Drupal.
At the time these projects were really hitting their stride (2005 - 2010), opensource systems built on a LAMP architecture were out-competing any proprietary language of similar capacity. The only one that came close to PHP's use was ASP and that was just because it had Microslop behind it. By 2010, PHP had pretty much dominated the existing opensource CMS community, which in turn meant most non-commercial websites and a fair chunk of commercial ones as well had their core interfaces written in PHP.
Does it have flaws? Absofuckinglutely. But it was the first widespread web programming language that was free, easy to learn, and worked well over 80% of the time across all browsers. Nothing since has really hit that sweet spot of being the right software for the right problem at exactly the right time, which is why its still in heavy use today.
I wouldn't. I'd let the community decide via voting. You don't engender discussion by silencing speakers because they don't meet your requirements of legitimacy. If there's a question of legitimacy or bad faith discussion, identify it, talk about it, and downvote the hell out of it if needed.
But don't remove it. Once you do, you're no longer curating a discussion. You're promoting an agenda.
Rejecting a voice out of hand because of whom its coming from is blatant censorship, and a tacit admission that your ideas can't compete with theirs in the arena of public discourse.
/c/politics is a hive of scum and pedantry, with a healthy dose of hypocrisy. If you say:
Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading
...while allowing articles that are blatant AI summaries from trash rags like the DailyBeast and Business Insider simply because they're tied to a company, you're not fostering political discussion. You're advancing a corporate agenda.


