this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
726 points (98.7% liked)

Not The Onion

19001 readers
892 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A controversial proposal from U.S Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to let bird flu naturally spread through poultry farms is raising alarms among scientists -- who say the move could be inhumane and dangerous.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] match@pawb.social 110 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (16 children)

Hitler came to power because the treaty of Versailles devastated and humiliated germany. what the fuck are historians going to point at in the US that lead to the rise in fascism? fucking gamergate? The self-inflicted 2008 crisis?

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 124 points 9 months ago (3 children)

What historians will point to in my opinion are two key point in modern American history that unleashed the decent into madness.

  1. Raegan, his financial policies laid the groundwork for the modern ultra wealthy tech bros.
  2. 9/11, 9/11 turned patriotism into a national psychotic duty.

After 9/11 you could slap a US flag on basically anything, shout patriotism and make a shit load of money while being thanked for it.

Then it just rolled on.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 99 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Don't forget the importance of the Citizens United ruling, which gave the green light to funnel unlimited amounts of corporate money into campaigns, reaching a crescendo in this past election when the world's richest man bought himself a President.

CU and the lack of federal public funding for elections (by which I mean the state funds the campaigns of those who want federal offices) basically resulted in the US political class ending up fully in the pocket of the corporations.

That's what absolutely destroyed our ability to elect anyone other than what the corporate doners want, and thus you end up with nothing but corporate-friendly politicians, and thus a whole bunch of people who have no problem with facism and well, here we are.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 25 points 9 months ago

Reagan was in place thanks to the Southern Strategy begun a decade or so earlier to ensure a voting percentage for the GOP and religious right no matter what. There are unfortunately many other "turning points" throughout US history where we could have gone a different route but chose this one, usually because "it's always been this way" mentality.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 months ago

9/11 helped but by that point Christian nationalists had already spent the 20 years since Regan tying patriotism to faith.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 49 points 9 months ago

A multitude of issues have contributed to this, the creation of fox News, allowing our entire manufacturing sector to leave the country, and then ignoring the poorest and most vulnerable people's issues, misinformation, social media, state actor disinformation campaigns, and probably a bunch of stuff I haven't mentioned. Pick your favorite.

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 38 points 9 months ago (4 children)

The pandemic, the inherent flaws of an antiquated two party system, malicious individuals controlling all major social media platforms, an overworked and undersupported population, low education standards. Idk I'm German and have never been over but from what I can tell it's very complex. And while many of my fellow Europeans like to give Americans shit online right now the truth is most of us are one or two unfortunate elections away from a similar scenario. Whatever it is that's driving people apart isn't exclusively an American problem.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Whatever it is that's driving people apart isn't exclusively an American problem.

This is the scary part. The entire world seems to be shifting right again. I think a lot of it how easy misinformation and disinformation is to spread with the ubiquitous social media now, but like you said, it's complex, and there likely isn't any single factor contributing to this.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 8 points 9 months ago

Just to chime in on Covid - I think that was a symptom caused by a lot of underlying problems, and not a cause. Granted it had its effects, but under a rational leadership from the US I don't think we would have seen what we did ever get that far. The topic here (bird flu), measles, etc. are an example of how they are more of a fever indicator from a deep infection we've had for decades and just pretended things were fine. Hell, the failure of Reconstruction after the Civil War is the ultimate example of that bandage over a festering wound.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

On the global stage, it's the explosion in communication tech with little to no oversight. It's not even the first time is happened in the last century. Radio, newspaper, television, whenever there's a new, faster way to disseminate information we collectively forget how important it is to regulate that shit before something bad happens. That, plus regulatory capture weakening the limits on already existing information platforms.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

healthcare, and lack of job prospect in many stems field as a undergrad. almost no help in getting people into wet lab work outside of your degree, since it is the most important part of the degree

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 20 points 9 months ago

Regan had a huge hand in the downfall of the US.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago (6 children)

I can at least tell you why people vote Trump. All right here:

How Half Of America Lost Its F**king Mind

Posted that many, many times, but it's important enough to post forever. As true now as it was in 2016.

I've been on both sides of what the author is talking about, seen and experienced everything he touches on. Give it a read, it's important.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 12 points 9 months ago

"They hate every part of capitalism without hating capitalism" comes to mind a lot

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah and it’s a good piece, but there’s a huge hole or two in the reasoning. Namely that rural areas are aiding and abetting the forces that beat them down despite clear and rational evidence - in abundance - to that fact.

They’ve given up on reason. They’re hoodwinked, bamboozled, conned, and every other synonym despite clear facts and science.

And cities bad is not new, but it’s also where their hero lives. So ?

Also the thing about cheering for assholes is kinda thin.

I think it’d be better to make these arguments through the media trump voters consume. That’s the underlying mechanic of his argument anyway.

[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That tracks, it's Jason Pargin. He's the king of oversimplifying an argument and then hammering it into the ground, but it's always at least entertaining.

[–] Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

...but it's always at least entertaining.

Careful, that's how I used to hear Joe Rogan described.

[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

There's a pretty wide fucking chasm between Jason Pargin and Joe Rogan, but I take your point. Honestly I'm not sure it's necessarily a bad thing, the left could use a Roganesque figure; especially one who isn't afraid to call people on their bullshit rather than buy into it.

[–] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 9 months ago

What I don't get is the bit at the end where it explains that Trump can be the guy they root for even though he is literally a smarmy big city elite who only goes to church for photo ops, doesn't pay his workers, etc. And the article is like, don't you root for Tony Stark and left-leaning talk show hosts, because they target the people you don't like?

And I'm like, no, honestly, those guys are insufferable. I need someone to explain why anyone likes them.

Also I grew up in a right-leaning area and I didn't understand their values any better when I was a kid, honestly. At least as a little kid I was religious, but when I got to high school and started asking tough questions at church it became obvious that our supposed religious leaders didn't have satisfactory answers to questions like "It would be immoral if I had the power to stop evil and didn't use it, why isn't it immoral for God to allow evil to exist?" So then I stopped being religious, too, which pushed me further out of their subculture.

(I guess some of my actual values aren't popular almost anywhere; I'm a pacifist anarchist which is fairly uncommon. So there has to be more to why people end up the way they do than where they live.)

[–] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 months ago

I think that this was maybe true the first time around in 2016. Trump was a brick through the window. But the 2024 election made no sense. Trumps campaign was based on hate, revenge, facisim and economic destruction. None of those values are supposed to align with your average rural republican. I also grew up around them and was raised to be a rural republican. Trumps stands for virtually none of their values. Those people changed their values this time around, including more own parents.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 2 points 9 months ago

Yeah, that all checks out.

But their way of living is dying because that's what happens with industrialization. It's not exactly something people can fight. It's been happening for a loooooong time.

Like there aren't many, if any, ways to prevent it from happening either.

[–] match@pawb.social 1 points 9 months ago

this is a good one, thank you

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Wasn't it Obama making fun of trump at the WH Correspondent's dinner? Thanks, Obama. /s

[–] Deme@sopuli.xyz 6 points 9 months ago

Capitalism has a tendency to eat everything it can. This includes the political system. The US is just ahead of the curve in this.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Spiraling wealth inequality that even the Democrats refused to acknowledge or fix, let alone the Republicans.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Democrats tried to fix it a bunch of times. Citizens United kept lobbying alive, Public Option healthcare (which would have made it almost imposible for private healthcare to compete) lost by 1 independent senator, Republicans keep getting elected to write the tax laws as they expire.

It's not from lack of trying by the DNC.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

No, they really didn't. "Public option healthcare" barely scratches the surface of the reforms that were needed, and hardly any Democrats except Elizabeth Warren were even trying to get them done. Hell, the main reason Bernie Sanders is an independent is that Democrats refuse to support those economic reforms!

So no. The Democrats didn't try to fix shit. Not really, not in the way it needed to get fixed.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Oh yeah? Which parts of it were insufficient?

Kind of weird for you to support needed reforms while opposing individual reforms.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

opposing individual reforms.

WTF are you taking about?

[–] Jordan117@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

In retrospect, I think the rise of smartphone-based, algorithm-driven social media circa 2012 will be seen as the information-age equivalent of lead poisoning that quietly brainrotted society. It greatly increased the power and reach of disinformation and radicalizing propaganda while destroying the ability of mainstream news sources to moderate or even alert people to the damage being done. There's a staggering gap in attitudes between people who get their news from social media apps vs. newspapers or even cable TV. And so much of the maliciousness is below the surface, distributed across millions of unique newsfeeds and "for you" pages that the public writ large has very little insight into. If some shell company were airing neonazi recruitment ads on national television, people would be shocked and outraged, but slip it into the feeds of vulnerable people and you can poison an entire generation with hardly anyone noticing until it's too late.

[–] match@pawb.social 2 points 9 months ago

do we outlaw the use of recommender systems in entertainment products then? what does a better future look like

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago

Well

Everything else that happened in those 90 years, AND racism because a whole bunch of lazy buttholes couldn't have slaves anymore.

[–] Mvlad88@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Deep rooted insecurity and lack of critical thinking.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Propaganda. Made hand-held and ubiquitous.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Capitalism

First-past-the-post voting

The War on drugs

The patriot act

Americans

The self-inflicted 2008 crisis?

The repeal of glass steagall act