this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2026
87 points (96.8% liked)

World News

58973 readers
2074 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] magguzu@lemmy.pt 7 points 8 hours ago

I forsee the bubble deflating rather than a pop

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 29 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Please. Then maybe those assholes at Nvidia and AMD will come back to us.

[–] ennof@feddit.org 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Why are they assholes? Am I out of the loop? I thought the assholes in this story were the LLM companies themselves?

[–] alpine_jim@piefed.social 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Nvidia is deep deep into the circular-financing scam - one recent example is they promised to provide two thirds of the money another company wants to pay for Nvidia chips. This demonstrates the prices are far far away from what real fair market prices should be, and that winners and losers are chosen in advance by negotiations between a few CEOs, not actual company performance. They're unashamedly drawing attention to the fact it's a bubble, and they're still inflating it.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 18 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

They'll never want to go back to what we gave them you'll be making up the difference

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Dagnet@lemmy.world 17 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Intel was supposed to be that

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 12 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Then we need a fourth option.

At this point, I'm committed to never giving AMD or NVIDIA another penny if I can possibly avoid it. And if Intel won't be the alternative then I'll wait to buy another computer or part until there's a viable fourth provider who actually wants my money, rather than to get in on the insane data center hype.

[–] Dagnet@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

I think your best shot is some new chinese company then. I know they are getting there with RAM but not sure on GPUs since its a whole different beast.

[–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

I heard about bolt graphics during last CES, they seem to be fairly far along ATM, but we probably won't see anything from them until 5-10 years at the earliest

[–] sprack@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The fabs are booked solid for the next 3yrs. It would require the customers to cancel their orders and that would only happen if they believe they can afford to let their competitors get ahead. This will keep moving forward unless China goes into Taiwan or global markets crash.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 26 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Bankruptcies tend to mean the orders are cancelled.

[–] sprack@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

And the capacity is picked up by the remaining ones that wanted more. Even with all the leveraged capital there is still an obscene amount of cash in most of the big companies building out. You’re thinking it just companies and not shells for nation-states that see this as strategic investment.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

And the capacity is picked up by the remaining ones that wanted more.

Not if there's a crash, these businesses are not making any money, they can't afford shit without loans and venture capital.
When that dries out, as it's already beginning to do, 80% of all those orders for the next 3 years will be cancelled, and the remaining 20% will be what was ordered from China through 3rd party companies to circumvent sanctions.
I don't think you are considering that these companies are burning something in the area of $100 BILLION per month!

[–] sprack@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

If there’s a legitimate crash everyone will have bigger problems than buying stuff for their gaming rigs.

OpenAI, Anthropic and the rest of the LLM crew are the highest profile users, but CSPs are close behind and cash heavy. And there’s an immense amount of ML/DL work being done that doesn’t get the publicity that is queued for HW too.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

If there’s a legitimate crash everyone will have bigger problems than buying stuff for their gaming rigs.

How bad it will be remains to be seen, it could be a process that takes a couple of years. Like the dot com crash.
A bank selling off AI loans at 17% yields is a pretty clear indicator that some financial institutions don't trust this industry anymore. And they aren't even that eager to buy up on the cheap!
That probably means they only got about $90 back for every $100 dollar they had loaned to the AI companies. Eating a 10% loss now is better than losing everything later.

[–] corvide077@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 hours ago

If not this quarter, then next fed reserve announcement

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 25 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] AnalogAllamma@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

A bubble bursts, there is no bursting involved.

[–] warbond@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I'm afraid I don't understand, is bursting not just the transition between not-burst and burst?

[–] lokalhorst@feddit.org 9 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

What they want to say is that often there is no transition, as in a flash crash.

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I think you're right, but that just highlights where the metaphor isn't perfect, because financial market bubbles do in fact transition from not-burst to burst, sometimes slowly over the course of months. Often it's not clear when the bursting began until we're pretty deep into it, and it's rarely clear when it's over until quite a while after it's ended.

[–] warbond@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Ah, like a once-in-a-century financial event... Say, when's the last time we had one of those?

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I seem to recall a very large financial bubble associated with a period of time called the "twenties." Something about "roaring."

On another topic entirely, remind me which decade we're in now, please?

[–] aetheplace@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It must be 1926. We have a prosperous decade leading up to a market inflated by stock market speculation, stock prices that are unlikely to match anticipated future earnings, the fed increasing interest rates to curb spending which is impacting construction investment, the overproduction of certain commodities, reduction in foreign trade and lending, and retaliatory tariffs and protectionist policies going into effect.

Oh wait, it's 100 years later and it just rhymes with the lead up to the Great Depression? Cool.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

You left out the retail investors thinking margin is a great way to amplify gains with no real risk...